Preconception care interventions among adolescents and young adults to prevent adverse maternal, perinatal and child health outcomes: An evidence gap map

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zahra Ali Padhani , Komal Abdul Rahim , Jodie C. Avery , Gizachew A. Tessema , Patience Castleton , Saba Nisa , Negin Mirzaei Damabi , Jacqueline A. Boyle , Rehana A. Salam , Salima Meherali , Zohra S. Lassi
{"title":"Preconception care interventions among adolescents and young adults to prevent adverse maternal, perinatal and child health outcomes: An evidence gap map","authors":"Zahra Ali Padhani ,&nbsp;Komal Abdul Rahim ,&nbsp;Jodie C. Avery ,&nbsp;Gizachew A. Tessema ,&nbsp;Patience Castleton ,&nbsp;Saba Nisa ,&nbsp;Negin Mirzaei Damabi ,&nbsp;Jacqueline A. Boyle ,&nbsp;Rehana A. Salam ,&nbsp;Salima Meherali ,&nbsp;Zohra S. Lassi","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify gaps in existing evidence on preconception health interventions to improve the health outcomes of adolescents, young adults, and their offspring.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Evidence gap map (EGM)</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the Campbell guidelines, we included reviews and interventional studies identified through searches on Medline and other electronic databases from 2010 to July 18th, 2023. Dual screening of titles/abstracts and full texts was conducted on Covidence software, followed by quality assessment and development of 2D-EGM using the EPPI-Reviewer and Mapper software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 18 studies (124 papers) were identified, of which most of the studies were from higher- and upper-middle-income countries, with limited evidence from low-middle-income countries. More than half focused on females with limited evidence on men. The monitoring of adverse events of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was the most well-evidenced area, with very little evidence on the herpes simplex virus candidate vaccine and other behavioural interventions. Perinatal outcomes were the most frequently reported outcomes followed by maternal and child health outcomes. Healthcare facilities (mostly clinical trials) were the most utilised delivery platforms, with limited or no evidence on communities, schools, and digital platforms. The overall quality of the systematic reviews was moderate while most of the trials had some concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study highlights a well-evidenced area in the safety of HPV vaccination with significant gaps in research on other key health interventions, particularly in non-healthcare settings. EGM suggests further research to evaluate the effectiveness of a broad range of preconception interventions, among adolescents and youth for improving long-term health outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"239 ","pages":"Pages 37-47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624005328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify gaps in existing evidence on preconception health interventions to improve the health outcomes of adolescents, young adults, and their offspring.

Study design

Evidence gap map (EGM)

Methods

Following the Campbell guidelines, we included reviews and interventional studies identified through searches on Medline and other electronic databases from 2010 to July 18th, 2023. Dual screening of titles/abstracts and full texts was conducted on Covidence software, followed by quality assessment and development of 2D-EGM using the EPPI-Reviewer and Mapper software.

Results

A total of 18 studies (124 papers) were identified, of which most of the studies were from higher- and upper-middle-income countries, with limited evidence from low-middle-income countries. More than half focused on females with limited evidence on men. The monitoring of adverse events of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was the most well-evidenced area, with very little evidence on the herpes simplex virus candidate vaccine and other behavioural interventions. Perinatal outcomes were the most frequently reported outcomes followed by maternal and child health outcomes. Healthcare facilities (mostly clinical trials) were the most utilised delivery platforms, with limited or no evidence on communities, schools, and digital platforms. The overall quality of the systematic reviews was moderate while most of the trials had some concerns.

Conclusion

The study highlights a well-evidenced area in the safety of HPV vaccination with significant gaps in research on other key health interventions, particularly in non-healthcare settings. EGM suggests further research to evaluate the effectiveness of a broad range of preconception interventions, among adolescents and youth for improving long-term health outcomes.
在青少年和年轻人中进行孕前护理干预以预防不良的孕产妇、围产期和儿童健康结果:证据差距图
目的:确定孕前健康干预措施改善青少年、年轻人及其后代健康结局的现有证据中的差距。方法:根据Campbell指南,我们纳入了2010年至2023年7月18日期间通过Medline和其他电子数据库检索到的综述和介入研究。在covid - ence软件上对标题/摘要和全文进行双重筛选,然后使用EPPI-Reviewer和Mapper软件对2D-EGM进行质量评估和开发。结果:共确定了18项研究(124篇论文),其中大多数研究来自高收入和中高收入国家,来自中低收入国家的证据有限。超过一半的研究集中在女性身上,而关于男性的证据有限。对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种不良事件的监测是证据最充分的领域,关于单纯疱疹病毒候选疫苗和其他行为干预措施的证据很少。围产期结果是最常报告的结果,其次是孕产妇和儿童健康结果。医疗机构(主要是临床试验)是使用最多的交付平台,在社区、学校和数字平台上的证据有限或没有。系统评价的总体质量是中等的,而大多数试验存在一些问题。结论:该研究强调了在HPV疫苗接种安全性方面有充分证据的领域,而在其他关键卫生干预措施方面的研究存在重大差距,特别是在非卫生保健环境中。该组织建议进一步开展研究,以评估在青少年和青年中广泛的孕前干预措施对改善长期健康结果的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信