Six Versus Three Doses of Intrapleural Streptokinase in Childhood Empyema: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Pulmonology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1002/ppul.27465
Chirag Thakur, Joseph L Mathew, Akshay K Saxena, Archana Angrup, Ram Samujh
{"title":"Six Versus Three Doses of Intrapleural Streptokinase in Childhood Empyema: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Chirag Thakur, Joseph L Mathew, Akshay K Saxena, Archana Angrup, Ram Samujh","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of administering six doses of intrapleural streptokinase (SK) versus the conventional three doses, in children with empyema.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this open label, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, we enrolled 53 children with empyema, who received three doses of intrapleural SK. Thereafter, those without clinical improvement (n = 34) and those showing clinical improvement but having persistent pleural fluid width > 10 mm on chest ultrasonography (n = 13), were randomized to receive three additional doses of SK, or three doses of placebo (normal saline). The remaining 6 children improved clinically and radiologically, hence were not randomized. The outcomes recorded were cumulative volume of pleural fluid drained, total duration of intercostal drainage, time taken for clinical improvement, duration of hospitalization, proportion of children with treatment failure requiring surgery, and adverse events. Spirometry, 6-min walk test, chest X-ray and ultrasonography were done 3 months following discharge. We analyzed by intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of children who received six versus three doses SK were comparable. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative volume of fluid drained; median (IQR): 810.0 (330.0, 1630.0) [95% CI: 505, 1463] mL versus 530.0 (255.2, 1325.0) [95% CI: 325, 1131] mL, p 0.46. There were no significant inter-group differences in the total duration of intercostal drainage, time taken for clinical improvement, duration of hospitalization, treatment failure, surgical decortication and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In children with empyema, intrapleural therapy with six doses of SK is not superior to three doses, although it is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"e27465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27465","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of administering six doses of intrapleural streptokinase (SK) versus the conventional three doses, in children with empyema.

Study design: In this open label, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, we enrolled 53 children with empyema, who received three doses of intrapleural SK. Thereafter, those without clinical improvement (n = 34) and those showing clinical improvement but having persistent pleural fluid width > 10 mm on chest ultrasonography (n = 13), were randomized to receive three additional doses of SK, or three doses of placebo (normal saline). The remaining 6 children improved clinically and radiologically, hence were not randomized. The outcomes recorded were cumulative volume of pleural fluid drained, total duration of intercostal drainage, time taken for clinical improvement, duration of hospitalization, proportion of children with treatment failure requiring surgery, and adverse events. Spirometry, 6-min walk test, chest X-ray and ultrasonography were done 3 months following discharge. We analyzed by intention-to-treat.

Results: The baseline characteristics of children who received six versus three doses SK were comparable. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative volume of fluid drained; median (IQR): 810.0 (330.0, 1630.0) [95% CI: 505, 1463] mL versus 530.0 (255.2, 1325.0) [95% CI: 325, 1131] mL, p 0.46. There were no significant inter-group differences in the total duration of intercostal drainage, time taken for clinical improvement, duration of hospitalization, treatment failure, surgical decortication and adverse events.

Conclusion: In children with empyema, intrapleural therapy with six doses of SK is not superior to three doses, although it is safe.

6对3剂量胸膜内链激酶治疗儿童脓胸:一项随机对照试验。
目的:比较6剂量胸膜内注射链激酶(SK)与常规3剂量胸膜内注射链激酶(SK)治疗儿童脓胸的疗效和安全性。研究设计:在这项开放标签、安慰剂对照、随机试验中,我们招募了53名患有脓胸的儿童,他们接受了三剂量的胸膜内SK。此后,那些没有临床改善的(n = 34)和那些临床改善但胸部超声显示胸腔积液宽度持续bbb10 mm的(n = 13)被随机分配接受三剂量的SK,或三剂量的安慰剂(生理盐水)。其余6例患儿临床及影像学均有改善,故未随机分组。记录的结果包括胸腔积液排出量、肋间引流总时间、临床改善所需时间、住院时间、治疗失败需要手术的儿童比例和不良事件。出院后3个月行肺活量测定、6分钟步行试验、胸部x线及超声检查。我们通过意向治疗进行分析。结果:接受6剂和3剂SK的儿童的基线特征具有可比性。两组的累计排液量差异无统计学意义;中位数(IQR): 810.0 (330.0, 1630.0) [95% CI: 505, 1463] mL vs . 530.0 (255.2, 1325.0) [95% CI: 325, 1131] mL, p 0.46。两组间在肋间引流总时间、临床改善时间、住院时间、治疗失败、手术去皮、不良事件等方面无显著差异。结论:在儿童脓胸中,6剂SK胸腔内治疗并不优于3剂,尽管它是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信