Assessment of mechanical properties and microstructure of Co-Cr dental alloys manufactured by casting, milling, and 3D printing

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ana Schettini DMD , Igor J. Pesun DMD, MS , Rodrigo França DMD, MS, PhD
{"title":"Assessment of mechanical properties and microstructure of Co-Cr dental alloys manufactured by casting, milling, and 3D printing","authors":"Ana Schettini DMD ,&nbsp;Igor J. Pesun DMD, MS ,&nbsp;Rodrigo França DMD, MS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>The mechanical properties and microstructure of cobalt chromium (Co-Cr) alloys should be considered when choosing the best alloy for each clinical situation. More information is needed on the digital manufacturing methods of metals in dentistry, such as computer numerical control (CNC), and direct laser metal sintering (DMLS).</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the 3 different Co-Cr manufacturing processes on the mechanical properties and microstructure of Co-Cr dental alloys.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Dumbbell-shaped specimens (n=6) were fabricated using casting (CAST), CNC, and DMLS techniques. Tensile, 3-point bend, and microhardness testing were performed, and the microstructure evaluated through scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and X-ray diffraction analysis. The ANOVA test followed by post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DMLS showed the greatest values for 0.2% yield strength (908.0 ±13.1 MPa), tensile strength (1123.7 ±6.5 MPa), flexural strength (2273.0 ±43.2 MPa), and microhardness (438.2 ±44.9 HV), followed by CAST and CNC. No statistical differences were found for elongation between CNC and DMLS or DMLS and CAST (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). No statistical differences were found in elastic modulus among all groups (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). EDX revealed a slightly different chemical composition among the groups. XRD showed face-centered cubic as the dominant phase and a small amount of hexagonal close-packed structure in all groups. A peak of σ phase was identified in the CAST group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The mechanical properties and microstructures of Co-Cr dental alloys were significantly influenced by the fabrication method used. DMLS and CNC milling produced better products that traditional methods, leading to the improved durability and reliability of dental prostheses. These advancements underscore the importance of selecting appropriate fabrication methods to optimize clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 3","pages":"Pages 906.e1-906.e7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324008357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

The mechanical properties and microstructure of cobalt chromium (Co-Cr) alloys should be considered when choosing the best alloy for each clinical situation. More information is needed on the digital manufacturing methods of metals in dentistry, such as computer numerical control (CNC), and direct laser metal sintering (DMLS).

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the 3 different Co-Cr manufacturing processes on the mechanical properties and microstructure of Co-Cr dental alloys.

Material and methods

Dumbbell-shaped specimens (n=6) were fabricated using casting (CAST), CNC, and DMLS techniques. Tensile, 3-point bend, and microhardness testing were performed, and the microstructure evaluated through scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and X-ray diffraction analysis. The ANOVA test followed by post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis (α=.05).

Results

DMLS showed the greatest values for 0.2% yield strength (908.0 ±13.1 MPa), tensile strength (1123.7 ±6.5 MPa), flexural strength (2273.0 ±43.2 MPa), and microhardness (438.2 ±44.9 HV), followed by CAST and CNC. No statistical differences were found for elongation between CNC and DMLS or DMLS and CAST (P>.05). No statistical differences were found in elastic modulus among all groups (P>.05). EDX revealed a slightly different chemical composition among the groups. XRD showed face-centered cubic as the dominant phase and a small amount of hexagonal close-packed structure in all groups. A peak of σ phase was identified in the CAST group.

Conclusions

The mechanical properties and microstructures of Co-Cr dental alloys were significantly influenced by the fabrication method used. DMLS and CNC milling produced better products that traditional methods, leading to the improved durability and reliability of dental prostheses. These advancements underscore the importance of selecting appropriate fabrication methods to optimize clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
通过铸造、铣削和3D打印制造的Co-Cr牙科合金的机械性能和微观结构评估。
问题说明:根据不同的临床情况选择最佳的合金时,应考虑钴铬合金的力学性能和微观结构。牙科金属的数字化制造方法需要更多的信息,如计算机数控(CNC)和直接激光金属烧结(DMLS)。目的:研究三种不同工艺对牙科用Co-Cr合金力学性能和显微组织的影响。材料和方法:采用铸造(CAST)、CNC和DMLS技术制作哑铃形标本(n=6)。进行了拉伸、三点弯曲和显微硬度测试,并通过扫描电子显微镜、能量色散x射线分析和x射线衍射分析评估了微观结构。采用方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行统计学分析(α= 0.05)。结果:DMLS在0.2%屈服强度(908.0±13.1 MPa)、抗拉强度(1123.7±6.5 MPa)、抗弯强度(2273.0±43.2 MPa)和显微硬度(438.2±44.9 HV)上最大,其次为CAST和CNC。CNC与DMLS或DMLS与CAST的伸长率无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。各组间弹性模量差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。EDX显示各组之间的化学成分略有不同。XRD结果表明,各基团均以面心立方相为主,且均存在少量的六方密排结构。CAST组出现σ相峰。结论:制备方法对钴铬牙科合金的力学性能和显微组织有显著影响。DMLS和CNC铣削生产出比传统方法更好的产品,从而提高了义齿的耐用性和可靠性。这些进步强调了选择合适的制造方法以优化临床结果和患者满意度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信