Legume intakes on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome function: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Md Altaf Hossain, Khushboo Soni, Dominic Agyei, Biniam Kebede, Andrew N Reynolds
{"title":"Legume intakes on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome function: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Md Altaf Hossain, Khushboo Soni, Dominic Agyei, Biniam Kebede, Andrew N Reynolds","doi":"10.1007/s00394-024-03576-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legumes are widely considered one of the most beneficial food groups to consume. They are high in fibre and plant-based protein as well as naturally low in sodium, saturated fats, and sugars. However, legumes do not feature prominently in the modern diet, and previous evidence syntheses show inconsistent results on cardiometabolic risk profile when increasing legume intakes. This review examines the impact of legume intake on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 15 May 2024 with checking of relevant reference lists and bibliographies. Relevant data were extracted into pre-tested forms and risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2. Searches, screening, and risk of bias assessment were done independently by two reviewers. We have considered trials where legumes were provided to adults, with and without pre-existing conditions (i.e. type 2 diabetes, heart disease or dyslipidaemia), in randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration on cardiometabolic risk factors and gut microbiome outcomes. Trial data were pooled using random effects models. Prespecified regression analyses were then performed to identify the factors influencing pooled results. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 30 papers of 24 trials with 33 eligible comparisons where legumes (daily average 86 g (range 2-251)) were provided to 1,938 participants. No eligible studies reported on microbiome outcomes. There was moderate certainty evidence that higher legume intakes improved total cholesterol (mean difference (MD) -0.23mmol/L, 95%CI -0.33 to -0.13), LDL cholesterol (MD -0.16mmol/L (-0.24 to -0.08)), and fasting blood glucose (MD -0.18mmol/L (-0.30 to -0.06)). The majority of trial comparisons (70%) provided an isoenergetic control food. Pooled results were influenced by underlying differences between trials such as type and format of legumes provided, but not consistently across multiple outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing legume intakes improved some blood lipid and glucose parameters, but not all. Isoenergetic comparisons in trials may obscure changes in cardiometabolic risk factors due to greater satiation or reduced intake, and no trials greater than six weeks duration were identified to consider the microbiome-mediated health effects with greater legume intakes. Future trials in these areas are necessary.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospero ID CRD42023456953.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":"64 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03576-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Legumes are widely considered one of the most beneficial food groups to consume. They are high in fibre and plant-based protein as well as naturally low in sodium, saturated fats, and sugars. However, legumes do not feature prominently in the modern diet, and previous evidence syntheses show inconsistent results on cardiometabolic risk profile when increasing legume intakes. This review examines the impact of legume intake on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome.

Methods: EMBASE, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 15 May 2024 with checking of relevant reference lists and bibliographies. Relevant data were extracted into pre-tested forms and risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2. Searches, screening, and risk of bias assessment were done independently by two reviewers. We have considered trials where legumes were provided to adults, with and without pre-existing conditions (i.e. type 2 diabetes, heart disease or dyslipidaemia), in randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration on cardiometabolic risk factors and gut microbiome outcomes. Trial data were pooled using random effects models. Prespecified regression analyses were then performed to identify the factors influencing pooled results. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE.

Results: We identified 30 papers of 24 trials with 33 eligible comparisons where legumes (daily average 86 g (range 2-251)) were provided to 1,938 participants. No eligible studies reported on microbiome outcomes. There was moderate certainty evidence that higher legume intakes improved total cholesterol (mean difference (MD) -0.23mmol/L, 95%CI -0.33 to -0.13), LDL cholesterol (MD -0.16mmol/L (-0.24 to -0.08)), and fasting blood glucose (MD -0.18mmol/L (-0.30 to -0.06)). The majority of trial comparisons (70%) provided an isoenergetic control food. Pooled results were influenced by underlying differences between trials such as type and format of legumes provided, but not consistently across multiple outcomes.

Conclusions: Increasing legume intakes improved some blood lipid and glucose parameters, but not all. Isoenergetic comparisons in trials may obscure changes in cardiometabolic risk factors due to greater satiation or reduced intake, and no trials greater than six weeks duration were identified to consider the microbiome-mediated health effects with greater legume intakes. Future trials in these areas are necessary.

Trial registration: Prospero ID CRD42023456953.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on immunology and inflammation, gene expression, metabolism, chronic diseases, or carcinogenesis, or a major focus on epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients, biofunctionality of food and food components, or the impact of diet on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信