Frailty in older adults with systemic lupus erythematosus and emergency department utilization: an administrative claims data analysis of Medicare beneficiaries.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Sarah B Lieber, Musarrat Nahid, Iris Navarro-Millán, Mangala Rajan, Sebastian E Sattui, M Carrington Reid, Lisa A Mandl
{"title":"Frailty in older adults with systemic lupus erythematosus and emergency department utilization: an administrative claims data analysis of Medicare beneficiaries.","authors":"Sarah B Lieber, Musarrat Nahid, Iris Navarro-Millán, Mangala Rajan, Sebastian E Sattui, M Carrington Reid, Lisa A Mandl","doi":"10.1007/s10067-024-07173-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction / objectives: </strong>While presence of concomitant SLE and frailty has been associated with greater emergency department (ED) use than SLE alone in young/mid-aged adults, whether frailty increases ED use in older adults with SLE remains unknown. In a nationally representative United States administrative claims dataset, we investigated the association of frailty duration with use of ED services in the SLE population compared with individuals without systemic rheumatic disease (SRD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We identified Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years with SLE and matched them (1:4) by age and gender with non-SRD comparators with osteoarthritis. Frailty was determined using a claims-based index and examined each study year (1/2006-9/2015). We used mixed-effect Poisson regression to ascertain the effect of frailty duration exposure on the risk of ED visits in those with SLE and in non-SRD participants, adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline (2006), frailty prevalence was similar in participants with SLE (N = 1338; 43.7%) and no SRD (N = 5352; 42.4%) (p = 0.37). Frailty prevalence significantly increased and diverged over time between participants with SLE versus no SRD (67.6% versus 63.7% in 2010 and 83.5% versus 78.1% in 2014) (p < 0.05). As frailty duration increased, risk of ED visits increased in both groups, including after covariate adjustment (SLE: incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.12; non-SRD: IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of older adults, duration of frailty conferred similar increased risk of ED visits among those with and without SLE. This underscores the importance of measuring frailty in older populations with SLE. Key Points • Frailty prevalence was similar at baseline, and increased over time, in participants with SLE and those with no systemic rheumatic disease; however, frailty prevalence increased to a greater extent in those with SLE. • Frailty duration conferred similar increased risk of ED visits among older adults with and without SLE. • This underscores the importance of identifying, preventing, and/or reversing frailty in older populations with SLE and not assuming that SLE alone adequately explains health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07173-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction / objectives: While presence of concomitant SLE and frailty has been associated with greater emergency department (ED) use than SLE alone in young/mid-aged adults, whether frailty increases ED use in older adults with SLE remains unknown. In a nationally representative United States administrative claims dataset, we investigated the association of frailty duration with use of ED services in the SLE population compared with individuals without systemic rheumatic disease (SRD).

Method: We identified Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years with SLE and matched them (1:4) by age and gender with non-SRD comparators with osteoarthritis. Frailty was determined using a claims-based index and examined each study year (1/2006-9/2015). We used mixed-effect Poisson regression to ascertain the effect of frailty duration exposure on the risk of ED visits in those with SLE and in non-SRD participants, adjusting for covariates.

Results: At baseline (2006), frailty prevalence was similar in participants with SLE (N = 1338; 43.7%) and no SRD (N = 5352; 42.4%) (p = 0.37). Frailty prevalence significantly increased and diverged over time between participants with SLE versus no SRD (67.6% versus 63.7% in 2010 and 83.5% versus 78.1% in 2014) (p < 0.05). As frailty duration increased, risk of ED visits increased in both groups, including after covariate adjustment (SLE: incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.12; non-SRD: IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.10).

Conclusions: In this cohort of older adults, duration of frailty conferred similar increased risk of ED visits among those with and without SLE. This underscores the importance of measuring frailty in older populations with SLE. Key Points • Frailty prevalence was similar at baseline, and increased over time, in participants with SLE and those with no systemic rheumatic disease; however, frailty prevalence increased to a greater extent in those with SLE. • Frailty duration conferred similar increased risk of ED visits among older adults with and without SLE. • This underscores the importance of identifying, preventing, and/or reversing frailty in older populations with SLE and not assuming that SLE alone adequately explains health risks.

老年人系统性红斑狼疮的虚弱和急诊科的利用:医疗保险受益人的行政索赔数据分析。
简介/目的:虽然在年轻/中年成人中,SLE合并虚弱与单独SLE相比,急诊科(ED)使用率更高,但虚弱是否会增加老年SLE患者ED使用率尚不清楚。在具有全国代表性的美国行政索赔数据集中,我们调查了SLE人群与无系统性风湿病(SRD)的个体相比,虚弱持续时间与ED服务的使用之间的关系。方法:我们确定了年龄≥65岁的系统性红斑狼疮医疗保险受益人,并将他们与患有骨关节炎的非srd比较者按年龄和性别进行匹配(1:4)。使用基于索赔的指数确定虚弱程度,并在每个研究年度(2006年1月至2015年9月)进行检查。我们使用混合效应泊松回归来确定虚弱持续时间暴露对SLE患者和非srd参与者ED就诊风险的影响,并对协变量进行调整。结果:基线时(2006年),SLE患者的虚弱患病率相似(N = 1338;43.7%),无SRD (N = 5352;42.4%) (p = 0.37)。随着时间的推移,虚弱患病率在SLE患者和无SRD患者之间显著增加和分化(2010年67.6%对63.7%,2014年83.5%对78.1%)(p结论:在该老年人队列中,虚弱持续时间在有和没有SLE患者中导致ED就诊风险增加相似。这强调了在老年SLE患者中测量虚弱程度的重要性。•在SLE和无系统性风湿病的参与者中,虚弱患病率在基线时相似,并随着时间的推移而增加;然而,在SLE患者中,虚弱患病率增加的程度更大。•在有和没有SLE的老年人中,虚弱持续时间增加了ED就诊的风险。•这强调了识别、预防和/或逆转老年SLE患者虚弱的重要性,而不是假设SLE本身足以解释健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信