Effect of sac transection versus sac reduction on seroma in laparoscopic indirect hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03236-0
Rui Cao, Xiangyu Shao, Junsheng Li
{"title":"Effect of sac transection versus sac reduction on seroma in laparoscopic indirect hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rui Cao, Xiangyu Shao, Junsheng Li","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03236-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seroma formation is a prevalent postoperative complication following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. While seromas are mostly self-absorbed, they can cause discomfort for the patient and complicate the assessment of hernia recurrence. Two primary techniques for managing the hernia sac are sac transection and complete sac reduction. This article aims to evaluate whether sac transection leads to a higher incidence of seroma compared to sac reduction and to review the main preventive strategies for seroma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library) and ClinicalTrials.gov were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. The date of the last search was 25 March 2024. The results reported should include reliable information on seroma incidence, mean operation time, hospital stay and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present study included 6 studies compared the results of indirect hernia sac transection and complete sac reduction. The pooled results indicated that indirect hernia sac transection was associated increased seroma formation (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.35-2.24%), and there was no statistical difference in mean operation time, hospital stay and recurrence between the sac transection (TS) and sac reduction (RS) groups. Postoperative pain was evaluated in 4 studies. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in postoperative pain reported in each of the four articles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed that transection of the indirect hernia sac is associated with a higher incidence of seroma, but does not increase the occurrence of other complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03236-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seroma formation is a prevalent postoperative complication following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. While seromas are mostly self-absorbed, they can cause discomfort for the patient and complicate the assessment of hernia recurrence. Two primary techniques for managing the hernia sac are sac transection and complete sac reduction. This article aims to evaluate whether sac transection leads to a higher incidence of seroma compared to sac reduction and to review the main preventive strategies for seroma.

Methods: Four databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library) and ClinicalTrials.gov were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. The date of the last search was 25 March 2024. The results reported should include reliable information on seroma incidence, mean operation time, hospital stay and postoperative complications.

Results: The present study included 6 studies compared the results of indirect hernia sac transection and complete sac reduction. The pooled results indicated that indirect hernia sac transection was associated increased seroma formation (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.35-2.24%), and there was no statistical difference in mean operation time, hospital stay and recurrence between the sac transection (TS) and sac reduction (RS) groups. Postoperative pain was evaluated in 4 studies. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in postoperative pain reported in each of the four articles.

Conclusions: The study revealed that transection of the indirect hernia sac is associated with a higher incidence of seroma, but does not increase the occurrence of other complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信