Investigating the safety influence path of right-turn configurations on vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk at signalized intersections.

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Mingjie Feng, Jing Zhao, Chaofan Hou, Chunting Nie, Jianke Hou
{"title":"Investigating the safety influence path of right-turn configurations on vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk at signalized intersections.","authors":"Mingjie Feng, Jing Zhao, Chaofan Hou, Chunting Nie, Jianke Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Right-turning vehicles and pedestrians share the right-of-way during the permitted signal phase at intersections in countries with right-handed traffic. Although right-turning vehicles are required to stop or yield to pedestrians according to the traffic rules, there still remains circumstances where the two will compete, posing significant safety risks to pedestrians. To investigate the impact mechanism of right-turn configurations, driver characteristics, and traffic operational features on vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk, a driving simulator experiment was conducted. The driving trajectory data of 51 drivers across 28 different scenarios encompassing customized intersection configurations and various traffic conditions were collected. Evaluation indicators, including average crossing speed, maximum deceleration, and post encroachment time (PET) were extracted, of which the first two represented the driving performance of right-turning vehicles, and the last was used to assess vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk. Using a categorical boosting (CatBoost)-Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) approach, pedestrian volume was identified as the most significant influencing factor, with its two levels having the most differential impact on each of the three evaluation indicators. Consequently, a multigroup path analysis was conducted to explore the varying safety influence paths of diverse factors on vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk under different pedestrian volumes. The mediating effects of the average crossing speed and maximum deceleration were found to be significant only under low pedestrian volumes, indicating that intersection configurations not only affect right-turn safety directly but also produce significant indirect effects by influencing driving performance. However, in scenarios with high pedestrian volumes, intersection configurations influenced right-turn safety directly but with no significant indirect effects. The corresponding quantitative insights can help urban road designers construct safer intersections.</p>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"211 ","pages":"107910"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107910","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Right-turning vehicles and pedestrians share the right-of-way during the permitted signal phase at intersections in countries with right-handed traffic. Although right-turning vehicles are required to stop or yield to pedestrians according to the traffic rules, there still remains circumstances where the two will compete, posing significant safety risks to pedestrians. To investigate the impact mechanism of right-turn configurations, driver characteristics, and traffic operational features on vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk, a driving simulator experiment was conducted. The driving trajectory data of 51 drivers across 28 different scenarios encompassing customized intersection configurations and various traffic conditions were collected. Evaluation indicators, including average crossing speed, maximum deceleration, and post encroachment time (PET) were extracted, of which the first two represented the driving performance of right-turning vehicles, and the last was used to assess vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk. Using a categorical boosting (CatBoost)-Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) approach, pedestrian volume was identified as the most significant influencing factor, with its two levels having the most differential impact on each of the three evaluation indicators. Consequently, a multigroup path analysis was conducted to explore the varying safety influence paths of diverse factors on vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk under different pedestrian volumes. The mediating effects of the average crossing speed and maximum deceleration were found to be significant only under low pedestrian volumes, indicating that intersection configurations not only affect right-turn safety directly but also produce significant indirect effects by influencing driving performance. However, in scenarios with high pedestrian volumes, intersection configurations influenced right-turn safety directly but with no significant indirect effects. The corresponding quantitative insights can help urban road designers construct safer intersections.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信