Developing the allied health professionals workforce within mental health, learning disability and autism inpatient services: rapid review of learning from quality and safety incidents.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ceri Wilson, Rachel Wakefield, Louise Prothero, Gillian Janes, Fiona Nolan, Sally Fowler-Davis
{"title":"Developing the allied health professionals workforce within mental health, learning disability and autism inpatient services: rapid review of learning from quality and safety incidents.","authors":"Ceri Wilson, Rachel Wakefield, Louise Prothero, Gillian Janes, Fiona Nolan, Sally Fowler-Davis","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allied health professionals (AHPs) in inpatient mental health, learning disability and autism services work in cultures dominated by other professions who often poorly understand their roles. Furthermore, identified learning from safety incidents often lacks focus on AHPs and research is needed to understand how AHPs contribute to safe care in these services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid literature review was conducted on material published from February 2014 to February 2024, reporting safety incidents within adult inpatient mental health, learning disability and autism services in England, with identifiable learning for AHPs. 115 reports/publications were included, predominantly consisting of independent investigations by NHS England, prevent future deaths reports and Care Quality Commission reports.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Misunderstanding of AHP roles, from senior leadership to frontline staff, led to AHPs being disempowered and excluded from conversations/decisions, and patients not getting sufficient access to AHPs, contributing to safety incidents. A central thread 'organisational culture' ran through five subthemes: (1) (lack of) effective multidisciplinary team (MDT) working, evidenced by poor communication, siloed working, marginalisation of AHPs and a lack of psychological safety; (2) (lack of) AHP involvement in patient care including care and discharge planning, and risk assessment/management. Some MDTs had no AHPs, some recommendations by AHPs were not actioned and referrals to AHPs were not always made when indicated; (3) training needs were identified for AHPs and other professions; (4) staffing issues included understaffing of AHPs and (5) senior management and leadership were found to not value/understand AHP roles, and instil a blame culture. A need for cohesive, well-led and nurturing MDTs was emphasised.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding and recognition of AHP roles is lacking at all levels of healthcare organisations. AHPs can be marginalised in MDTs, presenting risks to patients and missed opportunities for quality improvement. Raising awareness of the essential roles of AHPs is critical for improving quality and safety in inpatient mental health, learning disability and autism services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allied health professionals (AHPs) in inpatient mental health, learning disability and autism services work in cultures dominated by other professions who often poorly understand their roles. Furthermore, identified learning from safety incidents often lacks focus on AHPs and research is needed to understand how AHPs contribute to safe care in these services.

Methods: A rapid literature review was conducted on material published from February 2014 to February 2024, reporting safety incidents within adult inpatient mental health, learning disability and autism services in England, with identifiable learning for AHPs. 115 reports/publications were included, predominantly consisting of independent investigations by NHS England, prevent future deaths reports and Care Quality Commission reports.

Findings: Misunderstanding of AHP roles, from senior leadership to frontline staff, led to AHPs being disempowered and excluded from conversations/decisions, and patients not getting sufficient access to AHPs, contributing to safety incidents. A central thread 'organisational culture' ran through five subthemes: (1) (lack of) effective multidisciplinary team (MDT) working, evidenced by poor communication, siloed working, marginalisation of AHPs and a lack of psychological safety; (2) (lack of) AHP involvement in patient care including care and discharge planning, and risk assessment/management. Some MDTs had no AHPs, some recommendations by AHPs were not actioned and referrals to AHPs were not always made when indicated; (3) training needs were identified for AHPs and other professions; (4) staffing issues included understaffing of AHPs and (5) senior management and leadership were found to not value/understand AHP roles, and instil a blame culture. A need for cohesive, well-led and nurturing MDTs was emphasised.

Conclusion: Understanding and recognition of AHP roles is lacking at all levels of healthcare organisations. AHPs can be marginalised in MDTs, presenting risks to patients and missed opportunities for quality improvement. Raising awareness of the essential roles of AHPs is critical for improving quality and safety in inpatient mental health, learning disability and autism services.

在精神健康、学习障碍和自闭症住院服务中发展专职保健专业人员队伍:快速审查从质量和安全事件中吸取的教训。
背景:住院心理健康、学习障碍和自闭症服务的联合卫生专业人员(ahp)在由其他专业主导的文化中工作,他们往往不太了解自己的角色。此外,从安全事件中确定的学习往往缺乏对ahp的关注,需要进行研究,以了解ahp如何促进这些服务中的安全护理。方法:对2014年2月至2024年2月发表的材料进行快速文献回顾,报告了英国成人住院患者心理健康、学习障碍和自闭症服务中的安全事件,并确定了ahp的学习情况。纳入了115份报告/出版物,主要包括英国国民健康服务体系的独立调查、预防未来死亡报告和护理质量委员会的报告。研究发现:从高层领导到一线员工对AHP角色的误解,导致AHP被剥夺权力,被排除在对话/决策之外,患者无法充分接触AHP,从而导致安全事故。一个中心线索“组织文化”贯穿五个子主题:(1)(缺乏)有效的多学科团队(MDT)工作,表现为沟通不周、工作孤立、ahp边缘化和缺乏心理安全感;(2)(缺乏)AHP参与患者护理,包括护理和出院计划,以及风险评估/管理。一些MDTs没有AHPs, AHPs的一些建议没有被执行,并且在需要时并不总是向AHPs转诊;(3)确定了ahp和其他专业的培训需求;(4)人员配置问题包括AHP人员配置不足;(5)高层管理和领导不重视/理解AHP角色,并灌输责备文化。会议强调需要有凝聚力、有良好领导和有教养的MDTs。结论:各级医疗机构缺乏对AHP作用的理解和认识。ahp在mdt中可能被边缘化,给患者带来风险,并错失质量改进的机会。提高对ahp重要作用的认识,对于提高住院精神卫生、学习障碍和自闭症服务的质量和安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信