Clinical remission in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab: A post-hoc analysis of RELIght study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Andriana I Papaioannou, Maria Kallieri, Eleftherios Zervas, Evangelia Fouka, Konstantinos Porpodis, Marija Hadji Mitrova, Eleni Tzortzaki, Michael Makris, Maria Ntakoula, Panagiotis Lyberopoulos, Katerina Dimakou, Sofia Koukidou, Sevasti Ampelioti, Anastasia Papaporfyriou, Konstantinos Katsoulis, Maria Kipourou, Nikoletta Rovina, Katerina Antoniou, Stylianos Vittorakis, Petros Bakakos, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Katerina Markopoulou, Panteleimon Avarlis, Ιlias C Papanikolaou, Miltiadis Markatos, Eleni Gaki, Konstantinos Samitas, Konstantinos Glynos, Spyros A Papiris, Despoina Papakosta, Nikolaos Tzanakis, Mina Gaga, Konstantinos Kostikas, Stelios Loukides
{"title":"Clinical remission in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab: A <i>post-hoc</i> analysis of RELIght study.","authors":"Andriana I Papaioannou, Maria Kallieri, Eleftherios Zervas, Evangelia Fouka, Konstantinos Porpodis, Marija Hadji Mitrova, Eleni Tzortzaki, Michael Makris, Maria Ntakoula, Panagiotis Lyberopoulos, Katerina Dimakou, Sofia Koukidou, Sevasti Ampelioti, Anastasia Papaporfyriou, Konstantinos Katsoulis, Maria Kipourou, Nikoletta Rovina, Katerina Antoniou, Stylianos Vittorakis, Petros Bakakos, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Katerina Markopoulou, Panteleimon Avarlis, Ιlias C Papanikolaou, Miltiadis Markatos, Eleni Gaki, Konstantinos Samitas, Konstantinos Glynos, Spyros A Papiris, Despoina Papakosta, Nikolaos Tzanakis, Mina Gaga, Konstantinos Kostikas, Stelios Loukides","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.240084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Remission of asthma can occur as part of the natural history of the disease; however, the use of biologics can result in disease remission in some patients. <b>Objective:</b> In this post hoc analysis of the RELIght study, we aimed to evaluate clinical remission in real life among patients treated with mepolizumab, to detect possible differences between \"remitters\" and \"nonremitters,\" and to evaluate possible predictors of remission. <b>Methods:</b> Clinical remission was defined as the absence of asthma exacerbations, discontinuation of oral corticosteroids (OCS), achievement of asthma control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] ≥ 20), and stable or improved lung function. <b>Results:</b> A total of 146 patients were evaluated; remission was achieved in 40 (27.4%) and 29 (22%) after 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 12 months, the patients in remission had a better baseline ACT score (17.0 [14.0-19.0] versus 15.0 [12.0-17.0]; p = 0.027), were more rarely using OCS (35% versus 62.2%; p = 0.004), and required a lower baseline dose of OCS (5.0 mg/day [5.0-10.0 mg/day] versus 10.0 mg/day [5.0-15.0 mg/day]; p = 0.042) at baseline, whereas, at 24 months, they less frequently carried a baseline diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (10.3% versus 32%; p = 0.031) and used lower doses of OCS at baseline (5.0 [1.0-5.0] versus 10.0 [5.0-15.0]; p = ≤0.001) versus nonremitters; 52.5% of patients had sustained remission, whereas 42.5% experienced relapse. These patients more frequently had GERD versus patients with sustained remission (52.9% versus 4.8%; p = 0.002). Finally, regression analysis has shown that GERD was the only predictor of relapse. <b>Conclusion:</b> Remitters had better asthma control and needed lower doses or no maintenance OCS at baseline, whereas GERD seems to be an important factor that affects remission and relapse.Clinical trial NCT04084613, <ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"http://www.clinical trials.gov\">www.clinical trials.gov</ext-link>.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"46 1","pages":"45-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.240084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remission of asthma can occur as part of the natural history of the disease; however, the use of biologics can result in disease remission in some patients. Objective: In this post hoc analysis of the RELIght study, we aimed to evaluate clinical remission in real life among patients treated with mepolizumab, to detect possible differences between "remitters" and "nonremitters," and to evaluate possible predictors of remission. Methods: Clinical remission was defined as the absence of asthma exacerbations, discontinuation of oral corticosteroids (OCS), achievement of asthma control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] ≥ 20), and stable or improved lung function. Results: A total of 146 patients were evaluated; remission was achieved in 40 (27.4%) and 29 (22%) after 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 12 months, the patients in remission had a better baseline ACT score (17.0 [14.0-19.0] versus 15.0 [12.0-17.0]; p = 0.027), were more rarely using OCS (35% versus 62.2%; p = 0.004), and required a lower baseline dose of OCS (5.0 mg/day [5.0-10.0 mg/day] versus 10.0 mg/day [5.0-15.0 mg/day]; p = 0.042) at baseline, whereas, at 24 months, they less frequently carried a baseline diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (10.3% versus 32%; p = 0.031) and used lower doses of OCS at baseline (5.0 [1.0-5.0] versus 10.0 [5.0-15.0]; p = ≤0.001) versus nonremitters; 52.5% of patients had sustained remission, whereas 42.5% experienced relapse. These patients more frequently had GERD versus patients with sustained remission (52.9% versus 4.8%; p = 0.002). Finally, regression analysis has shown that GERD was the only predictor of relapse. Conclusion: Remitters had better asthma control and needed lower doses or no maintenance OCS at baseline, whereas GERD seems to be an important factor that affects remission and relapse.Clinical trial NCT04084613, www.clinical trials.gov.

mepolizumab治疗严重嗜酸性哮喘患者的临床缓解:一项RELIght研究的事后分析
背景:哮喘缓解可以作为疾病自然病程的一部分发生;然而,在一些患者中,使用生物制剂可以导致疾病缓解。目的:在这项RELIght研究的事后分析中,我们旨在评估接受mepolizumab治疗的患者在现实生活中的临床缓解,检测“缓解者”和“非缓解者”之间可能的差异,并评估缓解的可能预测因素。方法:临床缓解定义为没有哮喘加重,停止口服皮质类固醇(OCS),实现哮喘控制(哮喘控制试验[ACT]≥20),肺功能稳定或改善。结果:共评估146例患者;12个月后缓解40例(27.4%),24个月后缓解29例(22%)。12个月时,缓解期患者的基线ACT评分更高(17.0 [14.0-19.0]vs . 15.0 [12.0-17.0];p = 0.027),很少使用OCS(35%对62.2%;p = 0.004),并且需要较低的OCS基线剂量(5.0 mg/天[5.0-10.0 mg/天]vs . 10.0 mg/天[5.0-15.0 mg/天];p = 0.042),而在24个月时,他们较少进行胃食管反流病(GERD)的基线诊断(10.3%对32%;p = 0.031),并在基线时使用较低剂量的OCS(5.0[1.0-5.0]对10.0 [5.0-15.0];P =≤0.001)与非汇款者;52.5%的患者持续缓解,而42.5%的患者复发。与持续缓解的患者相比,这些患者更频繁地发生胃食管反流(52.9% vs 4.8%;p = 0.002)。最后,回归分析显示GERD是复发的唯一预测因子。结论:缓解者有较好的哮喘控制,需要较低的剂量或在基线时不需要维持OCS,而GERD似乎是影响缓解和复发的重要因素。临床试验NCT04084613, www.clinical trials.gov。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信