{"title":"Semantic knowledge of social norms in frontotemporal dementia patients with either predominant frontal or temporal lobe atrophy.","authors":"Ahmad Alsemari, Jason Osher, Ronald E Cobb","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2447041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Little is known about the relative contribution of frontal and anterior temporal lobes in semantic knowledge of social norms in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Therefore, this study examined performance of FTD patients with either frontal (F-FTD, left temporal (LT-FTD) or bitemporal lobe atrophy (BT-FTD) on the Social Norms Questionnaire (SNQ) and explored what accounts for the variance in the SNQ-break norm subscale (i.e., endorsement of inappropriate behaviors).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), groups were matched for age and education and included (a) 24 F-FTD patients, (b) 15 LT-FTD patients, (c) 17 BT-FTD patients, and (d) 188 older controls with normal cognition (NC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BT-FTD group had significantly higher SNQ break norm score than F-FTD and NC groups with a medium effect size, which was also positively associated with the severity personality changes in the real world. Interestingly, the F-FTD and LT-FTD groups performed similarly to the NC group. Regression analysis showed that approximately 21.2% of the variance in SNQ break norms subscale score performance was explained by performance on verb naming.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social inappropriateness in FTD may partially arise from a deficit in knowledge of normative behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2447041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Little is known about the relative contribution of frontal and anterior temporal lobes in semantic knowledge of social norms in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Therefore, this study examined performance of FTD patients with either frontal (F-FTD, left temporal (LT-FTD) or bitemporal lobe atrophy (BT-FTD) on the Social Norms Questionnaire (SNQ) and explored what accounts for the variance in the SNQ-break norm subscale (i.e., endorsement of inappropriate behaviors).
Methods: Using data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), groups were matched for age and education and included (a) 24 F-FTD patients, (b) 15 LT-FTD patients, (c) 17 BT-FTD patients, and (d) 188 older controls with normal cognition (NC).
Results: The BT-FTD group had significantly higher SNQ break norm score than F-FTD and NC groups with a medium effect size, which was also positively associated with the severity personality changes in the real world. Interestingly, the F-FTD and LT-FTD groups performed similarly to the NC group. Regression analysis showed that approximately 21.2% of the variance in SNQ break norms subscale score performance was explained by performance on verb naming.
Conclusions: Social inappropriateness in FTD may partially arise from a deficit in knowledge of normative behavior.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.