Impact of blood flow restriction intensity on pain perception and muscle recovery post-eccentric exercise

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Ozgur Surenkok, Gamze Aydin, Ebru Aloglu Ciftci, Kubra Kendal, Emine Atici
{"title":"Impact of blood flow restriction intensity on pain perception and muscle recovery post-eccentric exercise","authors":"Ozgur Surenkok,&nbsp;Gamze Aydin,&nbsp;Ebru Aloglu Ciftci,&nbsp;Kubra Kendal,&nbsp;Emine Atici","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is a well-established phenomenon characterized by ultrastructural muscle damage that typically develops following unfamiliar or high-intensity exercise. DOMS manifests with a constellation of symptoms, including muscle tenderness, stiffness, edema, mechanical hyperalgesia, and a reduced range of joint motion. In recent years, the application of blood flow restriction (BFR) has garnered attention for its potential impact on DOMS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of different BFR intensities on biomechanical alterations induced by DOMS in healthy individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty participants were split into two groups receiving either 80% or 20% BFR applied during low-intensity resistance exercise following DOMS induction. Pain perception, pressure pain threshold, muscle biometric characteristics, and strength were assessed before DOMS, after DOMS, and following BFR application at 24, 48, and 72 h.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The 80% BFR group experienced faster reductions in pain perception compared to the 20% BFR group. Muscle strength recovery was also statistically faster in the 80% BFR group. No significant differences were observed between groups in muscle stiffness, flexibility, or other mechanical properties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that BFR, particularly at higher intensities, may alleviate DOMS symptoms and accelerate muscle strength recovery. However, the lack of a control group and limitations in muscle property assessment warrant further research to definitively determine BFR's efficacy in managing DOMS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is a well-established phenomenon characterized by ultrastructural muscle damage that typically develops following unfamiliar or high-intensity exercise. DOMS manifests with a constellation of symptoms, including muscle tenderness, stiffness, edema, mechanical hyperalgesia, and a reduced range of joint motion. In recent years, the application of blood flow restriction (BFR) has garnered attention for its potential impact on DOMS.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different BFR intensities on biomechanical alterations induced by DOMS in healthy individuals.

Design and Methods

Thirty participants were split into two groups receiving either 80% or 20% BFR applied during low-intensity resistance exercise following DOMS induction. Pain perception, pressure pain threshold, muscle biometric characteristics, and strength were assessed before DOMS, after DOMS, and following BFR application at 24, 48, and 72 h.

Results

The 80% BFR group experienced faster reductions in pain perception compared to the 20% BFR group. Muscle strength recovery was also statistically faster in the 80% BFR group. No significant differences were observed between groups in muscle stiffness, flexibility, or other mechanical properties.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that BFR, particularly at higher intensities, may alleviate DOMS symptoms and accelerate muscle strength recovery. However, the lack of a control group and limitations in muscle property assessment warrant further research to definitively determine BFR's efficacy in managing DOMS.

血流限制强度对偏心运动后疼痛感知和肌肉恢复的影响。
背景:迟发性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)是一种公认的现象,其特征是肌肉超微结构损伤,通常在不熟悉或高强度运动后发生。DOMS表现为一系列症状,包括肌肉压痛、僵硬、水肿、机械性痛觉过敏和关节活动范围缩小。近年来,血流限制(BFR)的应用因其对迟发性肌肉酸痛的潜在影响而受到关注。目的:探讨不同BFR强度对健康人群迟发性肌肉酸痛引起的生物力学改变的影响。设计和方法:30名参与者被分为两组,在DOMS诱导后进行低强度阻力运动时接受80%或20% BFR。在迟发性肌肉酸痛前、迟发性肌肉酸痛后和BFR应用后24、48和72小时分别评估疼痛感觉、压力痛阈、肌肉生物特征和力量。结果:与20% BFR组相比,80% BFR组疼痛知觉的下降速度更快。肌肉力量恢复在80% BFR组也有统计学上更快。各组之间在肌肉僵硬度、柔韧性或其他机械性能方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:这些发现表明BFR,特别是在高强度时,可能减轻DOMS症状并加速肌肉力量恢复。然而,由于缺乏对照组和肌肉特性评估的局限性,需要进一步研究以明确确定BFR在治疗迟发性肌肉酸痛中的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信