The Impact of BRCA Mutation on the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3055
Ana Maria Popa, Horia Teodor Cotan, Cristian I Iaciu, Cornelia Nitipir
{"title":"The Impact of BRCA Mutation on the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Ana Maria Popa, Horia Teodor Cotan, Cristian I Iaciu, Cornelia Nitipir","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of BRCA mutational status on the outcomes of patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with either primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS). Material and <b>Methods:</b> a total of 79 patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer treated at Elias Emergency University Hospital between January 2014 and March 2024 were included. Patients received either PDS followed by chemotherapy or NACT-IDS. Clinical and pathological characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and stratified by BRCA mutational status. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare survival outcomes between BRCA-mutated (BRCAmut) and BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) patients across treatment groups. <b>Results:</b> the BRCAwt group showed a slight trend favoring PDS in terms of OS (48 months vs. 38 months, p = 0.03) and PFS (22 months vs. 19 months, p = 0.552), though the difference in PFS was not statistically significant. In contrast, BRCAmut patients treated with NACT-IDS demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to those undergoing PDS (71 months vs. 50 months, p = 0.043), while PFS was similar between groups (25 months vs. 23 months, p = 0.345). Complete cytoreduction (R0) was achieved in a higher proportion of BRCAmut patients (80.8% vs. 56.6% in BRCAwt).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BRCA mutational status is a critical factor influencing survival outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer. While BRCAwt patients may slightly benefit from PDS, BRCAmut patients exhibit significantly improved OS with NACT-IDS. These findings support the need for individualized treatment strategies based on BRCA status to optimize outcomes in ovarian cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 6","pages":"687-700"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of BRCA mutational status on the outcomes of patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with either primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS). Material and Methods: a total of 79 patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer treated at Elias Emergency University Hospital between January 2014 and March 2024 were included. Patients received either PDS followed by chemotherapy or NACT-IDS. Clinical and pathological characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and stratified by BRCA mutational status. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare survival outcomes between BRCA-mutated (BRCAmut) and BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) patients across treatment groups. Results: the BRCAwt group showed a slight trend favoring PDS in terms of OS (48 months vs. 38 months, p = 0.03) and PFS (22 months vs. 19 months, p = 0.552), though the difference in PFS was not statistically significant. In contrast, BRCAmut patients treated with NACT-IDS demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to those undergoing PDS (71 months vs. 50 months, p = 0.043), while PFS was similar between groups (25 months vs. 23 months, p = 0.345). Complete cytoreduction (R0) was achieved in a higher proportion of BRCAmut patients (80.8% vs. 56.6% in BRCAwt).

Conclusion: BRCA mutational status is a critical factor influencing survival outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer. While BRCAwt patients may slightly benefit from PDS, BRCAmut patients exhibit significantly improved OS with NACT-IDS. These findings support the need for individualized treatment strategies based on BRCA status to optimize outcomes in ovarian cancer.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信