Should We Plan CME vs non-CME surgery in colon cancer based on preoperative CT? An observational cohort study.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3042
Raluca Zaharia, Stefan Morarasu, Cristian Livadaru, Constantin Osman, Cristian Ene Roata, Gabriel-Mihail Dimofte, Sorinel Lunca
{"title":"Should We Plan CME vs non-CME surgery in colon cancer based on preoperative CT? An observational cohort study.","authors":"Raluca Zaharia, Stefan Morarasu, Cristian Livadaru, Constantin Osman, Cristian Ene Roata, Gabriel-Mihail Dimofte, Sorinel Lunca","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> tumour specific surgery in colon cancer is gaining popularity among colorectal surgeons. Many advocate adapting surgical technique based on preoperative CT staging as not all patients require complete mesocolic excision (CME) and D3 lymphadenectomy. We aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative CT scans in nodal staging and analyse whether inadequate CT staging could have influenced local recurrences. Material and <b>Methods:</b> a retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with stage I-III colon cancer who were followed up at our hospital between 2011 and 2019. The clinical and pathological variables and data on locoregional recurrence (LRR) were extracted from the electronic patient file, including imaging data performed as part of the standard oncological follow-up protocol. <b>Results:</b> the overall CT scan accuracy to identify the nodal status was 56.9% with sensitivity and specificity of 60.6% and 52.5%. Overstaging occurred in 95 patients (22%) and understaging in 92 (21%). Among understaged patients, 8 (8.7%) developed nodal LRR. Conclusion: considering that roughly one in three patients with nodal LRR, were underdiagnosed in terms of nodal status, by the preoperative CT assessment, the therapeutic decisions regarding the surgical approach should not be guided by this and CME with central vascular ligation (CVL) should be applied to all patients as a standardized surgical technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 6","pages":"626-633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: tumour specific surgery in colon cancer is gaining popularity among colorectal surgeons. Many advocate adapting surgical technique based on preoperative CT staging as not all patients require complete mesocolic excision (CME) and D3 lymphadenectomy. We aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative CT scans in nodal staging and analyse whether inadequate CT staging could have influenced local recurrences. Material and Methods: a retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with stage I-III colon cancer who were followed up at our hospital between 2011 and 2019. The clinical and pathological variables and data on locoregional recurrence (LRR) were extracted from the electronic patient file, including imaging data performed as part of the standard oncological follow-up protocol. Results: the overall CT scan accuracy to identify the nodal status was 56.9% with sensitivity and specificity of 60.6% and 52.5%. Overstaging occurred in 95 patients (22%) and understaging in 92 (21%). Among understaged patients, 8 (8.7%) developed nodal LRR. Conclusion: considering that roughly one in three patients with nodal LRR, were underdiagnosed in terms of nodal status, by the preoperative CT assessment, the therapeutic decisions regarding the surgical approach should not be guided by this and CME with central vascular ligation (CVL) should be applied to all patients as a standardized surgical technique.

根据术前CT,我们是否应该计划结肠癌的CME手术与非CME手术?观察性队列研究。
导言:结肠癌肿瘤特异性手术在结直肠外科医生中越来越受欢迎。许多人主张根据术前CT分期调整手术技术,因为并非所有患者都需要完全肠系膜切除(CME)和D3淋巴结切除术。我们的目的是评估术前CT扫描对淋巴结分期的敏感性和特异性,并分析CT分期不充分是否会影响局部复发。材料与方法:对2011 - 2019年在我院随访的I-III期结肠癌患者进行回顾性队列研究。临床和病理变量以及局部复发(LRR)数据从患者电子档案中提取,包括作为标准肿瘤随访方案一部分的影像学数据。结果:CT扫描识别结节状态的总体准确率为56.9%,敏感性和特异性分别为60.6%和52.5%。过度分期95例(22%),分期不足92例(21%)。在分期不足的患者中,8例(8.7%)发生了淋巴结性LRR。结论:考虑到大约三分之一的淋巴结性LRR患者在淋巴结状态方面未被诊断,通过术前CT评估,不应以此为指导决定手术入路,而应将CME联合中央血管结扎(CVL)作为一种标准化的手术技术应用于所有患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信