Exploring travel wellbeing and quality of life interaction among commuters in a heterogeneous urban region

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Rimpi Baro, K. V. Krishna Rao, Nagendra R. Velaga
{"title":"Exploring travel wellbeing and quality of life interaction among commuters in a heterogeneous urban region","authors":"Rimpi Baro, K. V. Krishna Rao, Nagendra R. Velaga","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10573-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Examining commuting and its connection to wellbeing is a crucial policy concern. Commuting in urban areas is highly stressful and unsafe due to the dearth of transportation supply. Studies examining the cascading phenomenon of commute stress and safety possibly affecting travel wellbeing (TWB) and subsequently impacting quality of life (QOL) are limited. Hence, this study examined the role of trip characteristics, stress and safety perceptions, and residence area characteristics on TWB and how TWB and all these factors further affect the QOL of commuters in a heterogeneous urban region using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). This study further analyzed the equitable distribution of TWB and QOL perceptions across socio-economic groups with the Gini index. A revealed preference survey was conducted in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India, and data was collected from 1431 commuters from diverse socio-economic groups. The results indicate that travel time, travel cost, travel discomfort, waiting time, and perceived stress negatively influence TWB, while perceived safety and travel mode are positively associated with TWB. Surprisingly, non-motorized commuters have the lowest TWB levels. Considering direct effects, TWB positively influences QOL, while travel discomfort negatively influences QOL. In indirect effects, perceived stress negatively influences QOL through TWB, whereas perceived safety positively influences QOL through its impact on TWB. The calculated Gini indexes imply equitable distribution of TWB and QOL perceptions among socio-economic groups segmented by income, age, and gender. The policy implications for improving TWB and QOL are discussed accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10573-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining commuting and its connection to wellbeing is a crucial policy concern. Commuting in urban areas is highly stressful and unsafe due to the dearth of transportation supply. Studies examining the cascading phenomenon of commute stress and safety possibly affecting travel wellbeing (TWB) and subsequently impacting quality of life (QOL) are limited. Hence, this study examined the role of trip characteristics, stress and safety perceptions, and residence area characteristics on TWB and how TWB and all these factors further affect the QOL of commuters in a heterogeneous urban region using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). This study further analyzed the equitable distribution of TWB and QOL perceptions across socio-economic groups with the Gini index. A revealed preference survey was conducted in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India, and data was collected from 1431 commuters from diverse socio-economic groups. The results indicate that travel time, travel cost, travel discomfort, waiting time, and perceived stress negatively influence TWB, while perceived safety and travel mode are positively associated with TWB. Surprisingly, non-motorized commuters have the lowest TWB levels. Considering direct effects, TWB positively influences QOL, while travel discomfort negatively influences QOL. In indirect effects, perceived stress negatively influences QOL through TWB, whereas perceived safety positively influences QOL through its impact on TWB. The calculated Gini indexes imply equitable distribution of TWB and QOL perceptions among socio-economic groups segmented by income, age, and gender. The policy implications for improving TWB and QOL are discussed accordingly.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信