Identifying the Knowledge and Capacity Gaps in Southeast Asian Insect Conservation

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1111/ele.70038
Xin Rui Ong, Belle Tan, Charlotte H. Chang, Nalini Puniamoorthy, Eleanor M. Slade
{"title":"Identifying the Knowledge and Capacity Gaps in Southeast Asian Insect Conservation","authors":"Xin Rui Ong,&nbsp;Belle Tan,&nbsp;Charlotte H. Chang,&nbsp;Nalini Puniamoorthy,&nbsp;Eleanor M. Slade","doi":"10.1111/ele.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Insects represent most of terrestrial animal biodiversity, and multiple reports suggest that their populations are declining globally due to anthropogenic impacts. Yet, a high proportion of insect species remain undescribed and limited data on their population dynamics hamper insect conservation efforts. This is particularly critical in tropical biodiversity hotspots such as Southeast Asia. To identify knowledge and capacity gaps in Southeast Asian insect conservation, we performed a quantitative review of insect occurrence records, studies for the region and global ‘#conservation’ posts from Twitter. We found that occurrence records increased over time, and were dominated by butterflies. Overall, studies were largely focused on pest and vector groups, and insect conservation and ecology studies were lacking in many countries. Despite an increase in local authorships and funding sources over time, the majority of these were still located outside of Southeast Asia. In ‘#conservation’ posts, insects were highly under-represented and insect-related content was biased towards popular groups such as bees and butterflies. We suggest potential solutions to address these gaps, such as integrative taxonomic approaches, and increasing regional collaborations and public engagements. Crucially, we stress the need for political will and funding to overcome the impediments towards insect conservation efforts in Southeast Asia.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insects represent most of terrestrial animal biodiversity, and multiple reports suggest that their populations are declining globally due to anthropogenic impacts. Yet, a high proportion of insect species remain undescribed and limited data on their population dynamics hamper insect conservation efforts. This is particularly critical in tropical biodiversity hotspots such as Southeast Asia. To identify knowledge and capacity gaps in Southeast Asian insect conservation, we performed a quantitative review of insect occurrence records, studies for the region and global ‘#conservation’ posts from Twitter. We found that occurrence records increased over time, and were dominated by butterflies. Overall, studies were largely focused on pest and vector groups, and insect conservation and ecology studies were lacking in many countries. Despite an increase in local authorships and funding sources over time, the majority of these were still located outside of Southeast Asia. In ‘#conservation’ posts, insects were highly under-represented and insect-related content was biased towards popular groups such as bees and butterflies. We suggest potential solutions to address these gaps, such as integrative taxonomic approaches, and increasing regional collaborations and public engagements. Crucially, we stress the need for political will and funding to overcome the impediments towards insect conservation efforts in Southeast Asia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

识别东南亚昆虫保护的知识和能力差距
昆虫代表了大部分陆生动物的生物多样性,多份报告表明,由于人为影响,它们的数量在全球范围内正在下降。然而,仍有很大比例的昆虫物种未被描述,其种群动态数据有限,阻碍了昆虫保护工作。这在东南亚等热带生物多样性热点地区尤为重要。为了确定东南亚昆虫保护方面的知识和能力差距,我们对昆虫发生记录、该地区的研究和Twitter上的全球“#conservation”帖子进行了定量回顾。我们发现,随着时间的推移,发生的记录有所增加,并且以蝴蝶为主。总的来说,研究主要集中在害虫和病媒群体上,许多国家缺乏昆虫保护和生态学研究。尽管随着时间的推移,当地作者和资金来源有所增加,但其中大多数仍然位于东南亚以外。在“#保护”的帖子中,昆虫的代表性非常低,与昆虫相关的内容偏向于蜜蜂和蝴蝶等受欢迎的群体。我们提出了解决这些差距的潜在解决方案,如综合分类学方法、加强区域合作和公众参与。至关重要的是,我们强调需要政治意愿和资金来克服东南亚昆虫保护工作的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信