{"title":"Editorial: The Critical Role of Very Long-Term Studies in Ecology and Evolution","authors":"Stéphane Blanc, Peter H. Thrall","doi":"10.1111/ele.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecological and evolutionary processes are inherently dynamic, driven by processes that often unfold over timescales that far exceed the duration of most studies. Short-term research provides valuable insights, but it captures only snapshots of these complex processes, potentially overlooking long-term patterns, counter-intuitive interactions and delayed responses. This special issue of Ecology Letters, titled ‘Ecological and Evolutionary Insights from Very Long-Term Studies’, highlights the unique and indispensable contributions of studies that have maintained consistent observations for two decades or more. Taken collectively, these studies demonstrate that the value of long-term studies increases with time.</p><p>In fact, while very long-term ecological studies are rare, in part because of the sustained commitment required to maintain them, they are essential for understanding the full complexity of natural systems (Jones and Driscoll <span>2022</span>). Many ecological processes, such as species interactions, population dynamics and responses to environmental change, can only be fully understood by observing them over decades. This is true for unravelling fundamental ecological and evolutionary mechanisms but also to study and model the responses of ecosystems to anthropogenic pressures. The IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) and IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) have indeed both emphasised the urgent need for long-term data to inform our understanding of biodiversity loss and climate change impacts.</p><p>These global assessments point to the critical role that long-term monitoring plays in detecting trends, predicting future changes, guiding policy (Hughes et al. <span>2017</span>) and shaping effective conservation and management strategies. Very long-term studies also have the potential to profoundly shift our thinking with regard to long-standing theoretical paradigms in ecology. Thus, such studies have contributed to recent models of how ecological disturbance plays out over multiple spatio-temporal scales, identifying the conditions that drive the emergence of new ecosystem states and how disturbance influences socio-economic dynamics (Gaiser et al. <span>2020</span>).</p><p>This special issue brings together studies that span from 20 to 54 years, showcasing the power of long-term monitoring to uncover ecological and evolutionary processes that would otherwise remain hidden. The range of taxa studied includes birds, plants, insects and marine species, offering a comprehensive view of how different life forms respond to environmental variability and anthropogenic pressures over extended periods of time.</p><p>For example, a 54-year dataset on snow petrels (<i>Pagodroma nivea</i>) reveals how climate change is reshaping pair bond dynamics, with increasing rates of divorce and widowhood linked to changing environmental conditions (Sun et al. <span>2024</span>). These disruptions are shown to have profound effects on breeding success and population dynamics. Another study draws on 46 years of monitoring shorebirds, revealing a clear trend of shrinking body size and lengthening bills—an adaptation likely driven by global warming (McQueen et al. <span>2024</span>). Such long-term data are invaluable for understanding how species adjust to slow, gradual changes, as well as to extreme events, which may go unnoticed in shorter studies.</p><p>Additionally, a 22-year study of seed production in a wet Amazonian forest has shown that rising night-time temperatures and declining moisture levels are directly impacting plant reproduction, with significant implications for forest structure, species interactions and community composition (Vleminckx et al. <span>2024</span>). These findings align with IPCC reports that highlight the vulnerability of tropical ecosystems to climate change, especially in terms of biodiversity shifts and ecosystem resilience. Understanding these long-term impacts is critical for predicting how global climate and biodiversity crises will unfold in the coming decades.</p><p>Many of the studies featured in this issue also provide insights into the resilience of ecosystems in the face of anthropogenically driven global change. The combination of long-term ecological data and evolutionary perspectives enables researchers to trace how species have adapted—or failed to adapt—over generations, providing critical knowledge for biodiversity conservation. For instance, IPBES has stressed the importance of understanding not just biodiversity loss but also the mechanisms behind species persistence and adaptation, which very long-term studies are uniquely positioned to uncover (Cocciardi et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>These long-term datasets are particularly crucial for organisms with multi-year or complex life cycles, allowing researchers to capture the full span of individual life histories and to understand how early-life conditions, extreme climatic events and ongoing anthropogenic pressures shape their futures. Long-term studies also allow us to examine how changes occurring over just a few generations can influence macroevolutionary patterns, reconciling the timescales of ecology and evolution, the subject of a recent Ecology Letters special issue. This is vital for making informed decisions about biodiversity preservation, ecosystem management and restoration efforts.</p><p>However, despite their importance, very long-term studies face significant challenges, particularly in securing sustained funding (Lindenmayer et al. <span>2012</span>). Most ecological studies last < 5 years, making it difficult to obtain the resources needed to continue research for decades. The contributions in this special issue not only highlight the scientific value of long-term studies but also advocate for greater investment in these essential research programmes. Both IPBES and IPCC reports call for enhanced monitoring efforts to track the long-term effects of global change on biodiversity and ecosystems, emphasising the need for sustained support for such initiatives.</p><p>We hope this special issue serves as a testament to the profound insights that very long-term studies can provide. It is our hope that these studies will inspire researchers, funding bodies and policymakers alike to recognise the critical importance of long-term ecological research and to commit to supporting these indispensable projects. Only with a long-term vision can we fully understand the complex, ongoing processes that shape the natural world and, ultimately, inform the actions needed to preserve it for future generations.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"27 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ecological and evolutionary processes are inherently dynamic, driven by processes that often unfold over timescales that far exceed the duration of most studies. Short-term research provides valuable insights, but it captures only snapshots of these complex processes, potentially overlooking long-term patterns, counter-intuitive interactions and delayed responses. This special issue of Ecology Letters, titled ‘Ecological and Evolutionary Insights from Very Long-Term Studies’, highlights the unique and indispensable contributions of studies that have maintained consistent observations for two decades or more. Taken collectively, these studies demonstrate that the value of long-term studies increases with time.
In fact, while very long-term ecological studies are rare, in part because of the sustained commitment required to maintain them, they are essential for understanding the full complexity of natural systems (Jones and Driscoll 2022). Many ecological processes, such as species interactions, population dynamics and responses to environmental change, can only be fully understood by observing them over decades. This is true for unravelling fundamental ecological and evolutionary mechanisms but also to study and model the responses of ecosystems to anthropogenic pressures. The IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) and IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) have indeed both emphasised the urgent need for long-term data to inform our understanding of biodiversity loss and climate change impacts.
These global assessments point to the critical role that long-term monitoring plays in detecting trends, predicting future changes, guiding policy (Hughes et al. 2017) and shaping effective conservation and management strategies. Very long-term studies also have the potential to profoundly shift our thinking with regard to long-standing theoretical paradigms in ecology. Thus, such studies have contributed to recent models of how ecological disturbance plays out over multiple spatio-temporal scales, identifying the conditions that drive the emergence of new ecosystem states and how disturbance influences socio-economic dynamics (Gaiser et al. 2020).
This special issue brings together studies that span from 20 to 54 years, showcasing the power of long-term monitoring to uncover ecological and evolutionary processes that would otherwise remain hidden. The range of taxa studied includes birds, plants, insects and marine species, offering a comprehensive view of how different life forms respond to environmental variability and anthropogenic pressures over extended periods of time.
For example, a 54-year dataset on snow petrels (Pagodroma nivea) reveals how climate change is reshaping pair bond dynamics, with increasing rates of divorce and widowhood linked to changing environmental conditions (Sun et al. 2024). These disruptions are shown to have profound effects on breeding success and population dynamics. Another study draws on 46 years of monitoring shorebirds, revealing a clear trend of shrinking body size and lengthening bills—an adaptation likely driven by global warming (McQueen et al. 2024). Such long-term data are invaluable for understanding how species adjust to slow, gradual changes, as well as to extreme events, which may go unnoticed in shorter studies.
Additionally, a 22-year study of seed production in a wet Amazonian forest has shown that rising night-time temperatures and declining moisture levels are directly impacting plant reproduction, with significant implications for forest structure, species interactions and community composition (Vleminckx et al. 2024). These findings align with IPCC reports that highlight the vulnerability of tropical ecosystems to climate change, especially in terms of biodiversity shifts and ecosystem resilience. Understanding these long-term impacts is critical for predicting how global climate and biodiversity crises will unfold in the coming decades.
Many of the studies featured in this issue also provide insights into the resilience of ecosystems in the face of anthropogenically driven global change. The combination of long-term ecological data and evolutionary perspectives enables researchers to trace how species have adapted—or failed to adapt—over generations, providing critical knowledge for biodiversity conservation. For instance, IPBES has stressed the importance of understanding not just biodiversity loss but also the mechanisms behind species persistence and adaptation, which very long-term studies are uniquely positioned to uncover (Cocciardi et al. 2024).
These long-term datasets are particularly crucial for organisms with multi-year or complex life cycles, allowing researchers to capture the full span of individual life histories and to understand how early-life conditions, extreme climatic events and ongoing anthropogenic pressures shape their futures. Long-term studies also allow us to examine how changes occurring over just a few generations can influence macroevolutionary patterns, reconciling the timescales of ecology and evolution, the subject of a recent Ecology Letters special issue. This is vital for making informed decisions about biodiversity preservation, ecosystem management and restoration efforts.
However, despite their importance, very long-term studies face significant challenges, particularly in securing sustained funding (Lindenmayer et al. 2012). Most ecological studies last < 5 years, making it difficult to obtain the resources needed to continue research for decades. The contributions in this special issue not only highlight the scientific value of long-term studies but also advocate for greater investment in these essential research programmes. Both IPBES and IPCC reports call for enhanced monitoring efforts to track the long-term effects of global change on biodiversity and ecosystems, emphasising the need for sustained support for such initiatives.
We hope this special issue serves as a testament to the profound insights that very long-term studies can provide. It is our hope that these studies will inspire researchers, funding bodies and policymakers alike to recognise the critical importance of long-term ecological research and to commit to supporting these indispensable projects. Only with a long-term vision can we fully understand the complex, ongoing processes that shape the natural world and, ultimately, inform the actions needed to preserve it for future generations.
生态和进化过程本质上是动态的,其驱动过程往往在远远超过大多数研究持续时间的时间尺度上展开。短期研究提供了有价值的见解,但它只捕获了这些复杂过程的快照,可能忽视了长期模式、反直觉的相互作用和延迟的反应。本期《生态学通讯》特刊题为“长期研究的生态学和进化见解”,重点介绍了20多年来保持一致观察的研究的独特和不可或缺的贡献。总的来说,这些研究表明,长期研究的价值随着时间的推移而增加。事实上,虽然非常长期的生态研究很少,部分原因是需要持续的承诺来维持它们,但它们对于理解自然系统的全部复杂性至关重要(Jones and Driscoll 2022)。许多生态过程,如物种相互作用、种群动态和对环境变化的响应,只有通过几十年的观察才能完全理解。这不仅适用于揭示基本的生态和进化机制,也适用于研究和模拟生态系统对人为压力的反应。IPBES(生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台)和IPCC(政府间气候变化专门委员会)确实都强调了对长期数据的迫切需要,以告知我们对生物多样性丧失和气候变化影响的理解。这些全球评估指出,长期监测在发现趋势、预测未来变化、指导政策(Hughes et al. 2017)以及制定有效的保护和管理战略方面发挥着关键作用。非常长期的研究也有可能深刻地改变我们对生态学长期存在的理论范式的看法。因此,这些研究为最近的生态干扰如何在多个时空尺度上发挥作用的模型做出了贡献,确定了驱动新生态系统状态出现的条件,以及干扰如何影响社会经济动态(Gaiser et al. 2020)。本期特刊汇集了跨度从20年到54年的研究,展示了长期监测在揭示生态和进化过程方面的力量,否则这些过程将被隐藏起来。研究的分类群范围包括鸟类、植物、昆虫和海洋物种,为不同的生命形式如何在长时间内对环境变化和人为压力做出反应提供了一个全面的视角。例如,关于雪海燕(Pagodroma nivea)的54年数据集揭示了气候变化如何重塑配对关系动态,离婚率和丧偶率的增加与环境条件的变化有关(Sun et al. 2024)。这些干扰被证明对繁殖成功和种群动态有深远的影响。另一项研究利用对滨鸟46年的监测,揭示了一种明显的体型缩小和喙延长的趋势——这种适应可能是由全球变暖驱动的(McQueen et al. 2024)。这些长期数据对于了解物种如何适应缓慢、渐进的变化以及极端事件是非常宝贵的,而这些变化在短期研究中可能会被忽视。此外,一项为期22年的亚马逊潮湿森林种子生产研究表明,夜间温度上升和湿度下降直接影响植物繁殖,对森林结构、物种相互作用和群落组成产生重大影响(Vleminckx et al. 2024)。这些发现与政府间气候变化专门委员会的报告一致,这些报告强调了热带生态系统对气候变化的脆弱性,特别是在生物多样性变化和生态系统恢复力方面。了解这些长期影响对于预测未来几十年全球气候和生物多样性危机将如何发展至关重要。本期专题的许多研究还提供了对生态系统在面对人为驱动的全球变化时的恢复力的见解。长期生态数据和进化观点的结合使研究人员能够追踪物种如何适应-或未能适应-几代人,为生物多样性保护提供关键知识。例如,IPBES强调,不仅要了解生物多样性的丧失,还要了解物种持续存在和适应背后的机制,这是长期研究的独特定位(Cocciardi et al. 2024)。这些长期数据集对于具有多年或复杂生命周期的生物尤为重要,使研究人员能够捕捉到个体生活史的全部跨度,并了解早期生活条件、极端气候事件和持续的人为压力如何塑造它们的未来。 长期研究还使我们能够研究几代人之间发生的变化如何影响宏观进化模式,调和生态学和进化的时间尺度,这是《生态学快报》最近一期特刊的主题。这对于就生物多样性保护、生态系统管理和恢复工作作出知情决定至关重要。然而,尽管它们很重要,但非常长期的研究面临着重大挑战,特别是在获得持续资金方面(Lindenmayer等人,2012)。大多数生态学研究持续5年,因此很难获得继续研究几十年所需的资源。本期特刊的文章不仅强调了长期研究的科学价值,而且还倡导对这些重要的研究项目进行更多的投资。IPBES和IPCC的报告都呼吁加强监测工作,追踪全球变化对生物多样性和生态系统的长期影响,强调需要持续支持这类倡议。我们希望这期特刊能证明长期研究所能提供的深刻见解。我们希望这些研究能够激励研究人员、资助机构和政策制定者认识到长期生态研究的重要性,并承诺支持这些不可或缺的项目。只有有了长远的眼光,我们才能充分理解塑造自然世界的复杂、持续的过程,并最终为子孙后代保护自然世界提供所需的行动。
期刊介绍:
Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.