Efficacy of Molecular Methods for the Diagnosis of Enteropathogenic Microorganisms Associated with Diarrhoea: A Systematic Review.

Diego Fernando Lopez Muñoz, Beatriz Giraldo Ospina, Leonardo Beltran Angarita
{"title":"Efficacy of Molecular Methods for the Diagnosis of Enteropathogenic Microorganisms Associated with Diarrhoea: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Diego Fernando Lopez Muñoz, Beatriz Giraldo Ospina, Leonardo Beltran Angarita","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Diarrhoea has a significant health impact and requires accurate diagnostic approaches, despite the limitations of many existing methods. This review examines various molecular techniques aimed at facilitating the rapid diagnosis of diarrhoeal diseases caused by bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted using six prestigious databases, including WOS, Scopus, Science Direct, Embase, PubMed and LILACS Plus. This rigorous approach allowed the synthesis of reviews on molecular diagnostic techniques for infectious diarrhoeal diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This research began with a careful systematic literature review of 2,760 scientific papers published in the last ten years (2014-2024), culminating in the inclusion of 18 studies following rigorous screening and eligibility criteria. In particular, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), isolation of genomic DNA from stool samples and the Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Assay emerged as the predominant molecular methods. These techniques demonstrated remarkable consistency in sensitivity, specificity and rapid diagnostic capability, particularly in the context of acute infectious diarrhoeal diseases. They also demonstrated the ability to simultaneously detect and identify multiple pathogens, including bacteria, viruses and parasites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of multiplex real-time PCR assays has not only improved the detection rates of enteropathogens, but has also revealed previously unrecognised gaps in the diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea. Our study highlights the importance of using molecular methods for comprehensive diagnosis in terms of sensitivity, specificity and rapid diagnostic capability. This will provide healthcare professionals with timely and accurate diagnostic data, enabling more effective treatment strategies for this public health problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"33 4","pages":"552-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Diarrhoea has a significant health impact and requires accurate diagnostic approaches, despite the limitations of many existing methods. This review examines various molecular techniques aimed at facilitating the rapid diagnosis of diarrhoeal diseases caused by bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted using six prestigious databases, including WOS, Scopus, Science Direct, Embase, PubMed and LILACS Plus. This rigorous approach allowed the synthesis of reviews on molecular diagnostic techniques for infectious diarrhoeal diseases.

Results: This research began with a careful systematic literature review of 2,760 scientific papers published in the last ten years (2014-2024), culminating in the inclusion of 18 studies following rigorous screening and eligibility criteria. In particular, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), isolation of genomic DNA from stool samples and the Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Assay emerged as the predominant molecular methods. These techniques demonstrated remarkable consistency in sensitivity, specificity and rapid diagnostic capability, particularly in the context of acute infectious diarrhoeal diseases. They also demonstrated the ability to simultaneously detect and identify multiple pathogens, including bacteria, viruses and parasites.

Conclusions: The use of multiplex real-time PCR assays has not only improved the detection rates of enteropathogens, but has also revealed previously unrecognised gaps in the diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea. Our study highlights the importance of using molecular methods for comprehensive diagnosis in terms of sensitivity, specificity and rapid diagnostic capability. This will provide healthcare professionals with timely and accurate diagnostic data, enabling more effective treatment strategies for this public health problem.

分子方法对腹泻相关肠道致病微生物诊断的有效性:系统综述。
背景和目的:腹泻对健康有重大影响,尽管许多现有方法存在局限性,但仍需要准确的诊断方法。本综述审查了旨在促进快速诊断由细菌、病毒和寄生虫病原体引起的腹泻病的各种分子技术。方法:采用WOS、Scopus、Science Direct、Embase、PubMed、LILACS Plus 6个知名数据库进行全面系统的文献综述。这种严格的方法使得对传染性腹泻疾病分子诊断技术的综述得以合成。结果:本研究首先对过去十年(2014-2024年)发表的2760篇科学论文进行了仔细系统的文献综述,最终通过严格的筛选和资格标准纳入了18项研究。特别是,多重聚合酶链反应(PCR),从粪便样本中分离基因组DNA和Luminex xTAG胃肠道病原体检测成为主要的分子方法。这些技术在敏感性、特异性和快速诊断能力方面表现出显著的一致性,特别是在急性传染性腹泻疾病方面。他们还展示了同时检测和识别多种病原体的能力,包括细菌、病毒和寄生虫。结论:多重实时荧光定量PCR检测不仅提高了肠道病原菌的检出率,而且揭示了感染性腹泻诊断中以前未被认识到的空白。我们的研究强调了在敏感性、特异性和快速诊断能力方面使用分子方法进行综合诊断的重要性。这将为卫生保健专业人员提供及时和准确的诊断数据,从而为这一公共卫生问题提供更有效的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信