An isothermal recombinase polymerase assay coupled with lateral flow dipstick for differentiation of pseudorabies virus wild isolates and gE-deleted vaccine strains.

L Ma, Y Wang, X Wang, M Zhang, M Zhu
{"title":"An isothermal recombinase polymerase assay coupled with lateral flow dipstick for differentiation of pseudorabies virus wild isolates and gE-deleted vaccine strains.","authors":"L Ma, Y Wang, X Wang, M Zhang, M Zhu","doi":"10.24425/pjvs.2024.152952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pseudorabies virus (PRV) is one of the most important infectious diseases which leads to significant economic losses in the global swine industry. The gE-deleted vaccine is widely used to prevent susceptible pigs from PRV infection. There is no report of the differentiation of PRV wild strain and vaccine strain by recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) coupled with a lateral flow dipstick (LFD) method. In the present study, the gD and gE gene-targeted primer-probe sets were designed. The RPA-LFD assay could discriminate between the PRV wild strain and the vaccine strain. The RPA reaction conditions were also evaluated. The optimal reaction temperature and reaction time for the RPA-LFD assay were 37℃ and 20 min. The detection limit was 10 genome copies per reaction for PRV wild strain and gE-deleted vaccine strain. The assay did not have cross-reaction with other common swine viral pathogens. The effectiveness of the RPA-LFD assay for detecting the clinical samples was evaluated by testing 80 samples. The result of the assay was compared with that of the conventional PCR. The positive rate of PRV wild strain by the RPA-LFD assay was 20%, whereas the positive rate of PRV wild strain by the PCR assay was 18.8%. The assay therefore provides a novel alternative for differentiation of PRV wild strain and vaccine strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":94175,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of veterinary sciences","volume":"27 4","pages":"621-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of veterinary sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/pjvs.2024.152952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pseudorabies virus (PRV) is one of the most important infectious diseases which leads to significant economic losses in the global swine industry. The gE-deleted vaccine is widely used to prevent susceptible pigs from PRV infection. There is no report of the differentiation of PRV wild strain and vaccine strain by recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) coupled with a lateral flow dipstick (LFD) method. In the present study, the gD and gE gene-targeted primer-probe sets were designed. The RPA-LFD assay could discriminate between the PRV wild strain and the vaccine strain. The RPA reaction conditions were also evaluated. The optimal reaction temperature and reaction time for the RPA-LFD assay were 37℃ and 20 min. The detection limit was 10 genome copies per reaction for PRV wild strain and gE-deleted vaccine strain. The assay did not have cross-reaction with other common swine viral pathogens. The effectiveness of the RPA-LFD assay for detecting the clinical samples was evaluated by testing 80 samples. The result of the assay was compared with that of the conventional PCR. The positive rate of PRV wild strain by the RPA-LFD assay was 20%, whereas the positive rate of PRV wild strain by the PCR assay was 18.8%. The assay therefore provides a novel alternative for differentiation of PRV wild strain and vaccine strain.

用等温重组酶聚合酶试验结合侧流试纸区分伪狂犬病毒野生分离株和ge缺失疫苗株。
伪狂犬病毒(PRV)是造成全球养猪业重大经济损失的重要传染病之一。基因缺失疫苗被广泛用于防止易感猪感染PRV。利用重组酶聚合酶扩增(RPA)结合侧流试纸(LFD)方法分化PRV野生株和疫苗株的研究尚未见报道。本研究设计了gD和gE基因靶向引物探针组。RPA-LFD法可以区分PRV野生株和疫苗株。并对RPA反应条件进行了评价。RPA-LFD检测的最佳反应温度和反应时间为37℃和20 min, PRV野生株和ge缺失疫苗株每次反应的检测限为10个基因组拷贝。该方法与其他常见的猪病毒病原体无交叉反应。RPA-LFD法检测80例临床样品,评价其检测效果。并与常规PCR的结果进行了比较。RPA-LFD法检测野生型PRV阳性率为20%,PCR法检测野生型PRV阳性率为18.8%。因此,该方法为PRV野生毒株和疫苗毒株的鉴别提供了一种新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信