Systematic review: differences in complete blood count component rhythms.

Anna Busza, Vani Sharma, Kendall Ferguson, Andrea Fawcett, Justin Knoll, Marta Iwanaszko, Phyllis Zee, Anna Fishbein
{"title":"Systematic review: differences in complete blood count component rhythms.","authors":"Anna Busza, Vani Sharma, Kendall Ferguson, Andrea Fawcett, Justin Knoll, Marta Iwanaszko, Phyllis Zee, Anna Fishbein","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The complete blood count (CBC) is one of the most commonly ordered blood tests with a large range of reference values that does not consider time of day for interpretation. Our objective was to systematically review this topic to report on peak and trough timing of CBC values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed for studies evaluating any component of the CBC with at least three collections over 24 hours. The studies were screened based on the predetermined eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis of aggregated data was analyzed with polynomial functions and forest plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 164 full-text articles were screened and 32 included in the final analysis with 548 total patients considering either leukocytes (<i>n</i> = 13), erythrocytes (<i>n</i> = 7), hemoglobin (<i>n</i> = 5), hematocrit (<i>n</i> = 5), platelets (<i>n</i> = 12), neutrophils (<i>n</i> = 11), lymphocytes (<i>n</i> = 13), monocytes (<i>n</i> = 8), eosinophils (<i>n</i> = 15), or basophils (<i>n</i> = 9). CBC components were analyzed by polynomial and forest plot analysis. Lymphocytes fitted best to a third-degree polynomial function (<i>p</i> = .010) with peak at 2264.87 cells/µL at 23:54 (CI: 1783.44 to 2746.31) with a trough of 1598.91 cells/µL at 10:47 (CI: 1230.12 to 1967.71). Lymphocytes and eosinophils peaked overnight, while erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit peaked in the morning, and platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, and basophils peaked in late afternoon. Limitations include small sample size and significant study heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified a limited scope of studies characterizing CBC component rhythms. However, we still noted significant differences, particularly with lymphocytes. Future work should evaluate larger datasets to inform time-dependent interpretation of the CBC as we move toward precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"5 1","pages":"zpae086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: The complete blood count (CBC) is one of the most commonly ordered blood tests with a large range of reference values that does not consider time of day for interpretation. Our objective was to systematically review this topic to report on peak and trough timing of CBC values.

Methods: A systematic search was performed for studies evaluating any component of the CBC with at least three collections over 24 hours. The studies were screened based on the predetermined eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis of aggregated data was analyzed with polynomial functions and forest plots.

Results: In total, 164 full-text articles were screened and 32 included in the final analysis with 548 total patients considering either leukocytes (n = 13), erythrocytes (n = 7), hemoglobin (n = 5), hematocrit (n = 5), platelets (n = 12), neutrophils (n = 11), lymphocytes (n = 13), monocytes (n = 8), eosinophils (n = 15), or basophils (n = 9). CBC components were analyzed by polynomial and forest plot analysis. Lymphocytes fitted best to a third-degree polynomial function (p = .010) with peak at 2264.87 cells/µL at 23:54 (CI: 1783.44 to 2746.31) with a trough of 1598.91 cells/µL at 10:47 (CI: 1230.12 to 1967.71). Lymphocytes and eosinophils peaked overnight, while erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit peaked in the morning, and platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, and basophils peaked in late afternoon. Limitations include small sample size and significant study heterogeneity.

Conclusion: We identified a limited scope of studies characterizing CBC component rhythms. However, we still noted significant differences, particularly with lymphocytes. Future work should evaluate larger datasets to inform time-dependent interpretation of the CBC as we move toward precision medicine.

系统综述:全血细胞计数成分节律的差异。
研究目的:全血细胞计数(CBC)是最常用的有序血液检查之一,具有大范围的参考值,不考虑一天中的时间进行解释。我们的目的是系统地回顾这一主题,报告CBC值的峰值和低谷时间。方法:对在24小时内至少收集三次CBC的任何成分的研究进行系统搜索。根据预先确定的资格标准对研究进行筛选。采用多项式函数和森林图对汇总数据进行meta分析。结果:共筛选164篇全文文章,其中32篇纳入最终分析,共548例患者,考虑白细胞(n = 13)、红细胞(n = 7)、血红蛋白(n = 5)、红细胞比容(n = 5)、血小板(n = 12)、中性粒细胞(n = 11)、淋巴细胞(n = 13)、单核细胞(n = 8)、嗜酸性粒细胞(n = 15)或嗜碱性粒细胞(n = 9)。CBC成分分析采用多项式分析和样地分析。淋巴细胞最符合三次多项式函数(p = 0.010), 23:54 (CI: 1783.44 ~ 2746.31)峰值为2264.87个细胞/µL, 10:47 (CI: 1230.12 ~ 1967.71)低谷为1598.91个细胞/µL。淋巴细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞在夜间达到峰值,而红细胞、血红蛋白和红细胞压积在上午达到峰值,血小板、中性粒细胞、单核细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞在下午晚些时候达到峰值。局限性包括样本量小和显著的研究异质性。结论:我们确定了有限范围的CBC成分节律特征研究。然而,我们仍然注意到显著的差异,特别是淋巴细胞。未来的工作应该评估更大的数据集,以便在我们走向精准医学的过程中,为CBC的时间依赖性解释提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信