Propensity score analysis of adjuvant therapy in radically resected gallbladder cancers: a real world experience from a regional cancer center.

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sushma Agrawal, Rahul, Mohammed Naved Alam, Neeraj Rastogi, Ashish Singh, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Anu Behari, Prabhakar Mishra
{"title":"Propensity score analysis of adjuvant therapy in radically resected gallbladder cancers: a real world experience from a regional cancer center.","authors":"Sushma Agrawal, Rahul, Mohammed Naved Alam, Neeraj Rastogi, Ashish Singh, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Anu Behari, Prabhakar Mishra","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Given the high mortality associated with gallbladder cancer (GBC), the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. We audited our data over an 11-year period to assess the impact of AT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included all patients who underwent curative resection for GBC from 2007 to 2017. Analyses were conducted of clinicopathological characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative therapeutic records. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) were evaluated against surgery alone using SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients (n = 142) was 50 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 93, 34, and 30 months with CT, CTRT, and surgery alone respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.612). Multivariate analysis indicated that only disease stage and microscopically involved margins significantly impacted OS and disease-free survival (DFS). CT showed increased effectiveness across all prognostic subsets, except for stage 4 and margin-positive resections. Following propensity score matching, median DFS and OS were higher in the CT group than in the CTRT group, although the differences were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radically resected GBC patients appear to benefit more from adjuvant CT, while CTRT should be reserved for cases with high-risk features.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: Given the high mortality associated with gallbladder cancer (GBC), the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. We audited our data over an 11-year period to assess the impact of AT.

Methods: This study included all patients who underwent curative resection for GBC from 2007 to 2017. Analyses were conducted of clinicopathological characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative therapeutic records. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) were evaluated against surgery alone using SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis.

Results: The median age of patients (n = 142) was 50 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 93, 34, and 30 months with CT, CTRT, and surgery alone respectively (p = 0.612). Multivariate analysis indicated that only disease stage and microscopically involved margins significantly impacted OS and disease-free survival (DFS). CT showed increased effectiveness across all prognostic subsets, except for stage 4 and margin-positive resections. Following propensity score matching, median DFS and OS were higher in the CT group than in the CTRT group, although the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Radically resected GBC patients appear to benefit more from adjuvant CT, while CTRT should be reserved for cases with high-risk features.

根治性切除胆囊癌辅助治疗的倾向评分分析:一家地区癌症中心的实际经验。
背景/目的:鉴于胆囊癌(GBC)的高死亡率,辅助治疗(AT)的疗效仍存在争议。我们对 11 年间的数据进行了审核,以评估辅助治疗的影响:本研究纳入了 2007 年至 2017 年期间所有接受治愈性切除术的 GBC 患者。对临床病理特征、手术细节和术后治疗记录进行了分析。使用SPSS 20版进行统计分析,评估辅助化疗(CT)或化放疗(CTRT)与单纯手术治疗的优势:患者的中位年龄(n = 142)为 50 岁。CT、CTRT 和单纯手术的中位总生存期(OS)分别为 93、34 和 30 个月(P = 0.612)。多变量分析表明,只有疾病分期和显微受累边缘对OS和无病生存期(DFS)有显著影响。除 4 期和边缘阳性切除术外,CT 在所有预后亚组中都显示出更高的有效性。倾向评分匹配后,CT组的中位DFS和OS均高于CTRT组,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05):结论:根治性切除的 GBC 患者似乎从 CT 辅助治疗中获益更多,而 CTRT 应保留给具有高风险特征的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信