Severe restenosis after stentless treatment with coronary intravascular lithotripsy for calcified nodule lesions: a serial observation with IVUS.

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Oxford Medical Case Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-28 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/omcr/omae156
Rina Konishi, Akinori Higaki, Toru Miyoshi, Kazuhisa Nishimura, Shuntaro Ikeda, Osamu Yamaguchi
{"title":"Severe restenosis after stentless treatment with coronary intravascular lithotripsy for calcified nodule lesions: a serial observation with IVUS.","authors":"Rina Konishi, Akinori Higaki, Toru Miyoshi, Kazuhisa Nishimura, Shuntaro Ikeda, Osamu Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1093/omcr/omae156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An 82-year-old woman with a history of myocardial infarction presented with worsening effort angina. Coronary angiography (CAG) revealed 75% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD), with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) identifying a severe calcified nodule near a previously implanted drug-eluting stent. The lesion was treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and a drug-coated balloon (DCB), avoiding left main crossover stenting. Despite initial success, the patient experienced restenosis three months later, managed conservatively based on favorable DFR/FFR values. However, worsening symptoms led to repeat CAG, revealing 99% restenosis with calcified nodule. A second IVL was performed, followed by crossover stenting from the left main to the LAD, achieving successful stent expansion. This case underscores the potential for severe restenosis following IVL and DCB angioplasty, highlighting the limitations of IVL in reducing calcified plaque volume and the importance of close follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":45318,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Medical Case Reports","volume":"2024 12","pages":"omae156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/omcr/omae156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An 82-year-old woman with a history of myocardial infarction presented with worsening effort angina. Coronary angiography (CAG) revealed 75% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD), with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) identifying a severe calcified nodule near a previously implanted drug-eluting stent. The lesion was treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and a drug-coated balloon (DCB), avoiding left main crossover stenting. Despite initial success, the patient experienced restenosis three months later, managed conservatively based on favorable DFR/FFR values. However, worsening symptoms led to repeat CAG, revealing 99% restenosis with calcified nodule. A second IVL was performed, followed by crossover stenting from the left main to the LAD, achieving successful stent expansion. This case underscores the potential for severe restenosis following IVL and DCB angioplasty, highlighting the limitations of IVL in reducing calcified plaque volume and the importance of close follow-up.

钙化结节病变的冠状动脉血管内碎石术无支架治疗后严重再狭窄:IVUS系列观察。
一位82岁女性,有心肌梗塞史,表现为心绞痛恶化。冠状动脉造影(CAG)显示75%的狭窄位于左前降支近端(LAD),血管内超声(IVUS)发现在先前植入的药物洗脱支架附近有一个严重的钙化结节。病变采用血管内碎石(IVL)和药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗,避免左主干交叉支架置入术。尽管最初成功,但患者在三个月后出现再狭窄,根据有利的DFR/FFR值进行保守管理。然而,症状恶化导致再次CAG,显示99%的再狭窄伴钙化结节。进行第二次IVL,然后从左主干到LAD交叉支架置入,支架扩张成功。该病例强调了IVL和DCB血管成形术后严重再狭窄的可能性,强调了IVL在减少钙化斑块体积方面的局限性和密切随访的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oxford Medical Case Reports
Oxford Medical Case Reports MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Oxford Medical Case Reports (OMCR) is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal publishing original and educationally valuable case reports that expand the field of medicine. The journal covers all medical specialities including cardiology, rheumatology, nephrology, oncology, neurology, and reproduction, comprising a comprehensive resource for physicians in all fields and at all stages of training. Oxford Medical Case Reports deposits all articles in PubMed Central (PMC). Physicians and researchers can find your work through PubMed , helping you reach the widest possible audience. The journal is also indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection . Oxford Medical Case Reports publishes case reports under the following categories: Allergy Audiovestibular medicine Cardiology and cardiovascular systems Critical care medicine Dermatology Emergency medicine Endocrinology and metabolism Gastroenterology and hepatology Geriatrics and gerontology Haematology Immunology Infectious diseases and tropical medicine Medical disorders in pregnancy Medical ophthalmology Nephrology Neurology Oncology Paediatrics Pain Palliative medicine Pharmacology and pharmacy Psychiatry Radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging Respiratory disorders Rheumatology Sexual and reproductive health Sports Medicine Substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信