Madisen T Russell, Imani S Linton, Jenifer L Vohs, Kyle S Minor
{"title":"Optimizing recovery in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review of psychosocial interventions.","authors":"Madisen T Russell, Imani S Linton, Jenifer L Vohs, Kyle S Minor","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) across multiple recovery outcomes. Drawing from 35 studies, the analysis synthesizes evidence on symptom reduction, social and role functioning improvement, continuity of care, hospitalization rates, and other psychological outcomes. Regarding symptom reduction, specialized FEP programs demonstrated decreases across positive, negative, and general symptoms. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) interventions also showed promise in improving psychiatric symptoms, while skills training interventions were effective in enhancing positive and negative symptoms. Social and role functioning improvements were observed across different interventions, including specialized FEP care and vocational support. Furthermore, specialized FEP programs generally led to reduced hospitalization rates and improved continuity of care, while CBT and other interventions improved psychological outcomes, such as enhanced coping skills and cognitive functioning. Most studies, particularly those of higher quality, reported positive outcomes across multiple domains. Future research should prioritize comparative efficacy, intervention duration and modality effects, and address disparities in access and utilization of FEP interventions across diverse contexts. By advancing our understanding of effective psychosocial interventions for FEP, this review offers valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers aiming to optimize outcomes and mitigate the burden of psychosis-related disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"275 ","pages":"166-178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) across multiple recovery outcomes. Drawing from 35 studies, the analysis synthesizes evidence on symptom reduction, social and role functioning improvement, continuity of care, hospitalization rates, and other psychological outcomes. Regarding symptom reduction, specialized FEP programs demonstrated decreases across positive, negative, and general symptoms. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) interventions also showed promise in improving psychiatric symptoms, while skills training interventions were effective in enhancing positive and negative symptoms. Social and role functioning improvements were observed across different interventions, including specialized FEP care and vocational support. Furthermore, specialized FEP programs generally led to reduced hospitalization rates and improved continuity of care, while CBT and other interventions improved psychological outcomes, such as enhanced coping skills and cognitive functioning. Most studies, particularly those of higher quality, reported positive outcomes across multiple domains. Future research should prioritize comparative efficacy, intervention duration and modality effects, and address disparities in access and utilization of FEP interventions across diverse contexts. By advancing our understanding of effective psychosocial interventions for FEP, this review offers valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers aiming to optimize outcomes and mitigate the burden of psychosis-related disabilities.
期刊介绍:
As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership!
Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue.
The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.