Efficacy of Scapular Functional and Cervical Isometric Exercises in the Management of Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/5873384
Nasrin Bharti, Hashim Ahmed, Shahnaz Hasan, Amir Iqbal, Shadab Uddin, Waseem M Ahamed, Fuzail Ahmad, Md Ali Mujtaba, Ahmad H Alghadir
{"title":"Efficacy of Scapular Functional and Cervical Isometric Exercises in the Management of Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial.","authors":"Nasrin Bharti, Hashim Ahmed, Shahnaz Hasan, Amir Iqbal, Shadab Uddin, Waseem M Ahamed, Fuzail Ahmad, Md Ali Mujtaba, Ahmad H Alghadir","doi":"10.1155/prm/5873384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The global rise in work-related musculoskeletal ailments has led to issues like neck discomfort, scapular muscle dysfunction, reduced neck mobility, and functional limitations. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of scapular functional exercises (SFE) and cervical isometric exercises (CIE) on pain, cervical range of motion (CROM), and functional limitations in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP). <b>Methods:</b> A two-arm, parallel group pretest-post-test randomized comparative trial was conducted. Thirty participants (21 females, 9 males; average age 28.94 ± 3.77 years) were randomly divided into two groups, 1 and 2 (<i>n</i> = 15/group). Both groups received common treatments of CIE and hot packs, while Group 1 was given SFE additionally. To assess the outcomes, which included pain, cervical range of motion (CROM), and functional limitations, measurements were taken using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), a standard universal goniometer, and a neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire at the beginning of the study and 4 weeks after the interventions. A one-way multivariate followed by univariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA and ANCOVA) was applied to examine the outcomes disparities within-group and between-group, with a significance level at 95% (i.e., <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> MANCOVA analysis revealed a significant impact of interventions on CROM in all directions, NPRS, and NDI scores, even after adjusting for initial scores (<i>F</i> (8, 13) = 90.1; <i>p</i>=0.001). Univariate ANCOVA showed significant improvements in outcomes for Group 1 compared to Group 2. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adding SFE to CIE and conventional physiotherapy was more effective than just using CIE and conventional physiotherapy alone. This approach better alleviated neck pain, improved CROM (particularly in forward and left-side flexion), and reduced functional limitations in individuals with CMNP. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05624021.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5873384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/5873384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global rise in work-related musculoskeletal ailments has led to issues like neck discomfort, scapular muscle dysfunction, reduced neck mobility, and functional limitations. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of scapular functional exercises (SFE) and cervical isometric exercises (CIE) on pain, cervical range of motion (CROM), and functional limitations in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP). Methods: A two-arm, parallel group pretest-post-test randomized comparative trial was conducted. Thirty participants (21 females, 9 males; average age 28.94 ± 3.77 years) were randomly divided into two groups, 1 and 2 (n = 15/group). Both groups received common treatments of CIE and hot packs, while Group 1 was given SFE additionally. To assess the outcomes, which included pain, cervical range of motion (CROM), and functional limitations, measurements were taken using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), a standard universal goniometer, and a neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire at the beginning of the study and 4 weeks after the interventions. A one-way multivariate followed by univariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA and ANCOVA) was applied to examine the outcomes disparities within-group and between-group, with a significance level at 95% (i.e., p < 0.05). Results: MANCOVA analysis revealed a significant impact of interventions on CROM in all directions, NPRS, and NDI scores, even after adjusting for initial scores (F (8, 13) = 90.1; p=0.001). Univariate ANCOVA showed significant improvements in outcomes for Group 1 compared to Group 2. Conclusions: Adding SFE to CIE and conventional physiotherapy was more effective than just using CIE and conventional physiotherapy alone. This approach better alleviated neck pain, improved CROM (particularly in forward and left-side flexion), and reduced functional limitations in individuals with CMNP. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05624021.

肩胛骨功能和颈椎等长运动治疗慢性机械性颈部疼痛的疗效:一项随机比较试验。
背景:与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病在全球范围内的增加,导致了诸如颈部不适、肩胛骨肌肉功能障碍、颈部活动能力降低和功能限制等问题。本研究旨在评估肩胛骨功能锻炼(SFE)和颈椎等距运动(CIE)对慢性机械性颈痛(CMNP)患者疼痛、颈椎活动度(CROM)和功能限制的有效性。方法:采用双臂、平行组、前测后测随机对照试验。参与者30人(女性21人,男性9人;平均年龄28.94±3.77岁),随机分为1、2组(n = 15/组)。两组均采用常规CIE +热敷治疗,组1加SFE治疗。为了评估结果,包括疼痛、颈椎活动度(CROM)和功能限制,在研究开始时和干预后4周,使用数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)、标准通用角计和颈部残疾指数(NDI)问卷进行测量。采用单因素多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA和ANCOVA)检验组内和组间结果差异,显著性水平为95%(即p < 0.05)。结果:MANCOVA分析显示,即使在调整初始评分后,干预措施对各方向的CROM、NPRS和NDI评分也有显著影响(F (8,13) = 90.1;p = 0.001)。单变量方差分析显示,与第二组相比,第一组的结果有显著改善。结论:在CIE联合常规物理治疗的基础上加SFE治疗比单独应用CIE和常规物理治疗更有效。这种方法可以更好地缓解颈部疼痛,改善CROM(特别是前屈和左屈),并减少CMNP患者的功能限制。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05624021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信