Application of an Innovative Embedding and Cooling Component in the Critical Steps of Fragmented Tissue Pathological Diagnosis.

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Xin Huang, Yuhuan Wang, Meihua Ye, Qingquan Fang
{"title":"Application of an Innovative Embedding and Cooling Component in the Critical Steps of Fragmented Tissue Pathological Diagnosis.","authors":"Xin Huang, Yuhuan Wang, Meihua Ye, Qingquan Fang","doi":"10.1002/jemt.24781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the application value of an innovative embedding and cooling component in the critical steps of fragmented tissue pathological diagnosis. Eighty small and fragmented tissue samples were collected and randomly divided into two groups. The embedding qualification rate and embedding efficiency were compared between the two groups. Seventy cases of fragmented tissue were collected, with three pieces of fragmented tissue taken from each case. The samples were randomly divided into three groups for sectioning. The wrinkle-free scores and sectioning efficiency were compared between different cooling methods. The embedding qualification rate was 90.0% in the embedding tweezer group, which was lower than 98.8% in the innovative component group (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.24, p < 0.05). The average embedding time per sample was 25.08 ± 4.61 s in the embedding tweezer group, which was significantly longer than the 16.69 ± 3.54 s in the innovative component group (t = 12.91, p < 0.001). The wrinkle-free section scores were 8.24 ± 0.69 in the small ice block cooling group, 8.11 ± 0.74 in the freezing platform cooling group, and 8.85 ± 0.65 in the innovative component cooling group, with the innovative component cooling group scoring significantly higher than the other two groups (q = 7.40, 8.98, p < 0.01). The innovative component cooling group had a shorter average sectioning time than the other two groups (q = 3.12, 26.75, p < 0.05, 0.01). The use of the innovative embedding and cooling component optimizes the embedding and sectioning steps in the pathological diagnosis of fragmented tissue. This method is worthy of promotion and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the application value of an innovative embedding and cooling component in the critical steps of fragmented tissue pathological diagnosis. Eighty small and fragmented tissue samples were collected and randomly divided into two groups. The embedding qualification rate and embedding efficiency were compared between the two groups. Seventy cases of fragmented tissue were collected, with three pieces of fragmented tissue taken from each case. The samples were randomly divided into three groups for sectioning. The wrinkle-free scores and sectioning efficiency were compared between different cooling methods. The embedding qualification rate was 90.0% in the embedding tweezer group, which was lower than 98.8% in the innovative component group (χ2 = 4.24, p < 0.05). The average embedding time per sample was 25.08 ± 4.61 s in the embedding tweezer group, which was significantly longer than the 16.69 ± 3.54 s in the innovative component group (t = 12.91, p < 0.001). The wrinkle-free section scores were 8.24 ± 0.69 in the small ice block cooling group, 8.11 ± 0.74 in the freezing platform cooling group, and 8.85 ± 0.65 in the innovative component cooling group, with the innovative component cooling group scoring significantly higher than the other two groups (q = 7.40, 8.98, p < 0.01). The innovative component cooling group had a shorter average sectioning time than the other two groups (q = 3.12, 26.75, p < 0.05, 0.01). The use of the innovative embedding and cooling component optimizes the embedding and sectioning steps in the pathological diagnosis of fragmented tissue. This method is worthy of promotion and application.

一种创新的嵌入和冷却组件在碎片组织病理诊断关键步骤中的应用。
本研究旨在探索一种创新的包埋冷却组件在碎片组织病理诊断关键步骤中的应用价值。收集80个小而碎片化的组织样本,随机分为两组。比较两组的埋置合格率和埋置效率。收集70例碎裂组织,每例取3块碎裂组织。样本随机分为三组进行切片。比较了不同冷却方式的无皱评分和切片效率。嵌套钳组的嵌套合格率为90.0%,低于创新组件组的98.8% (χ2 = 4.24, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信