Frozen section analysis of pancreatic resection margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is not affected by neoadjuvant therapy.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Patricia A Repollet Otero, Elsayed Ibrahim, Saverio Ligato
{"title":"Frozen section analysis of pancreatic resection margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is not affected by neoadjuvant therapy.","authors":"Patricia A Repollet Otero, Elsayed Ibrahim, Saverio Ligato","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The aim of our study was to evaluate if the histopathological changes occurring in the pancreas post neoadjuvant-therapy (PNAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may negatively affect the assessment of intra-operative frozen section (FS) analysis of pancreatic resection margins (PRMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed. Comparison of the accuracy of the FS analysis in treatment naïve (TN) and PNAT patients for all pancreatic margins was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 81 patients with PDAC (40 female, 41 male) of which 47 (58.0 %) were TN and 34 (42.0 %) PNAT. Including FSs performed for re-excisions of initially positive PRMs, we identified 2/103 discrepancies for the pancreatic neck margin, one in a TN patient and one in a PNAT patient; one discrepancy for the common bile duct margin (1/47) in a TN patient; and 2/14 discrepancies for the uncinate margin, both in TN patients. In summary, accuracy of FS analysis was similar in the PNAT and TN groups (98.8 % vs. 96.7 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The histopathological changes occurring in the pancreas PNAT for PDAC do not affect the histopathological interpretation of FS analysis of PRMs, and the accuracy of FS analysis is similar in the PNAT and TN patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2024.12.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate if the histopathological changes occurring in the pancreas post neoadjuvant-therapy (PNAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may negatively affect the assessment of intra-operative frozen section (FS) analysis of pancreatic resection margins (PRMs).

Methods: The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed. Comparison of the accuracy of the FS analysis in treatment naïve (TN) and PNAT patients for all pancreatic margins was performed.

Results: We identified 81 patients with PDAC (40 female, 41 male) of which 47 (58.0 %) were TN and 34 (42.0 %) PNAT. Including FSs performed for re-excisions of initially positive PRMs, we identified 2/103 discrepancies for the pancreatic neck margin, one in a TN patient and one in a PNAT patient; one discrepancy for the common bile duct margin (1/47) in a TN patient; and 2/14 discrepancies for the uncinate margin, both in TN patients. In summary, accuracy of FS analysis was similar in the PNAT and TN groups (98.8 % vs. 96.7 %).

Conclusions: The histopathological changes occurring in the pancreas PNAT for PDAC do not affect the histopathological interpretation of FS analysis of PRMs, and the accuracy of FS analysis is similar in the PNAT and TN patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信