Characterizing autogenous and reactive obsessions using theta and beta oscillations under inhibitory demands.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychiatric research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.024
Zachary T Gemelli, Maryam Ayazi, Han-Joo Lee
{"title":"Characterizing autogenous and reactive obsessions using theta and beta oscillations under inhibitory demands.","authors":"Zachary T Gemelli, Maryam Ayazi, Han-Joo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a heterogenous mental health condition that causes significant impairment and is often associated with poor treatment outcomes. The aim of the current study was to examine the association between electroencephalographic (EEG) oscillatory power during inhibitory task performance and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS). OCS was assessed using the well-established the Autogenous-Reactive Obsession (AO-RO) model as the main framework to address its heterogeneous clinical manifestations. The severity of AO and RO, as primary outcome measures, was indexed using the Revised Obsessive Intrusion Inventory (ROII). Cognitive- and behavioral inhibition (CI; BI) tasks were administered while EEG data were recorded from an analogue sample of 63 undergraduate students with OCS assessed along a dimensional spectrum. Oscillatory power was computed from frontal-central electrodes Fz and Cz for theta and beta frequency bands, using event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), which were entered into two hierarchical linear regression models to predict the severity of AO and RO, respectively, while controlling for covariates (i.e., sex, age, ethnicity, anxiety, depression, worry, and behavioral task performance). Theta power during CI (Theta-CI) was the only significant EEG predictor of AO severity, whereas beta power during BI (Beta-BI) was the only significant EEG predictor of RO severity. These results suggest that AO severity is primarily associated with an overactive neural correlate of cognitive control, whereas RO severity is primarily associated with an overactive neural correlate of behavioral cancellation. These results agree with previous literature suggesting overactive band power representing the dysfunction within OCD. Theta-CI and Beta-BI may serve as potential biomarkers differentially associated with AO and RO among undiagnosed individuals displaying varying levels of OCS, which warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"181 ","pages":"579-585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a heterogenous mental health condition that causes significant impairment and is often associated with poor treatment outcomes. The aim of the current study was to examine the association between electroencephalographic (EEG) oscillatory power during inhibitory task performance and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS). OCS was assessed using the well-established the Autogenous-Reactive Obsession (AO-RO) model as the main framework to address its heterogeneous clinical manifestations. The severity of AO and RO, as primary outcome measures, was indexed using the Revised Obsessive Intrusion Inventory (ROII). Cognitive- and behavioral inhibition (CI; BI) tasks were administered while EEG data were recorded from an analogue sample of 63 undergraduate students with OCS assessed along a dimensional spectrum. Oscillatory power was computed from frontal-central electrodes Fz and Cz for theta and beta frequency bands, using event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), which were entered into two hierarchical linear regression models to predict the severity of AO and RO, respectively, while controlling for covariates (i.e., sex, age, ethnicity, anxiety, depression, worry, and behavioral task performance). Theta power during CI (Theta-CI) was the only significant EEG predictor of AO severity, whereas beta power during BI (Beta-BI) was the only significant EEG predictor of RO severity. These results suggest that AO severity is primarily associated with an overactive neural correlate of cognitive control, whereas RO severity is primarily associated with an overactive neural correlate of behavioral cancellation. These results agree with previous literature suggesting overactive band power representing the dysfunction within OCD. Theta-CI and Beta-BI may serve as potential biomarkers differentially associated with AO and RO among undiagnosed individuals displaying varying levels of OCS, which warrants further investigation.

抑制性需求下的θ波和β波振荡表征自生性和反应性强迫。
强迫症(OCD)是一种异质性的精神健康状况,它会导致严重的损害,并且通常与不良的治疗结果相关。本研究的目的是检查抑制任务执行期间脑电图(EEG)振荡功率与强迫症(OCS)之间的关系。OCS的评估采用成熟的自体反应性强迫症(AO-RO)模型作为主要框架,以解决其异质性临床表现。AO和RO的严重程度作为主要结果测量,使用修订的强迫入侵量表(ROII)进行索引。认知和行为抑制;在执行BI)任务的同时,记录63名OCS本科生模拟样本的脑电图数据,并沿维度谱进行评估。在控制协变量(即性别、年龄、种族、焦虑、抑郁、担忧和行为任务表现)的同时,利用事件相关谱扰动(ERSPs),从θ和β频段的额中央电极Fz和Cz计算振荡功率,并将其输入两个层次线性回归模型,分别预测AO和RO的严重程度。CI期间的Theta功率(Theta-CI)是AO严重程度的唯一显著脑电预测因子,而BI期间的beta功率(beta -BI)是RO严重程度的唯一显著脑电预测因子。这些结果表明,AO严重程度主要与认知控制的过度活跃神经相关,而RO严重程度主要与行为取消的过度活跃神经相关。这些结果与先前的文献一致,认为过度活跃的波段功率代表强迫症的功能障碍。β - ci和β - bi可能作为潜在的生物标志物,在显示不同程度OCS的未确诊个体中与AO和RO存在差异,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信