Comparison of HDR-brachytherapy and tomotherapy for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers of the head and neck.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Giacomo Feliciani, Tiziana Licciardello, Claretta Guidi, Massimo Del Duca, Giorgio Mazzotti, Salvatore Roberto Bellia, Giulia Ghigi, Antonino Romeo, Anna Sarnelli
{"title":"Comparison of HDR-brachytherapy and tomotherapy for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers of the head and neck.","authors":"Giacomo Feliciani, Tiziana Licciardello, Claretta Guidi, Massimo Del Duca, Giorgio Mazzotti, Salvatore Roberto Bellia, Giulia Ghigi, Antonino Romeo, Anna Sarnelli","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate and compare High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with Helical Tomotherapy (HT) treatment plans. The focus is on small target volumes near radiation-sensitive organs in the ocular region, to evaluate the advantages of these techniques in treating skin cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational analysis included patients who underwent skin cancer HDR-BT Freiburg flap treatment between 2019 and 2023. An expert radiation oncologist contoured the planning target volumes (PTVs) and marked their visible extension with a radio-opaque tin wire. Each patient had two treatment plans: an individually shaped HDR-BT surface mold and an HT calculation used specifically for this study. Quality assurance of treatment plan was performed in both HDR-BT and HT. The plans were then compared using organ at risk (OAR) maximum doses and the conformity index CI. Radiation oncologists assessed their quality using their routine workflow evaluation plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients were selected for the inclusion in this study. HT provided more consistent target coverage than HDR-BT, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) at t-test. HT showed higher CIs and maximum dose for the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and lens in the homolateral part. Radiation oncologists preferred the overall quality of HT treatment due to its superior PTV coverage, especially for convex surfaces, while maintaining effective OAR sparing. HDR-BT is preferred when concave surfaces are present.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HT offers more conformal treatment, although some OAR parameters are statistically significantly better with HDR-BT, which may also be superior for complex geometries.</p>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"110703"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate and compare High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with Helical Tomotherapy (HT) treatment plans. The focus is on small target volumes near radiation-sensitive organs in the ocular region, to evaluate the advantages of these techniques in treating skin cancer.

Methods: This retrospective observational analysis included patients who underwent skin cancer HDR-BT Freiburg flap treatment between 2019 and 2023. An expert radiation oncologist contoured the planning target volumes (PTVs) and marked their visible extension with a radio-opaque tin wire. Each patient had two treatment plans: an individually shaped HDR-BT surface mold and an HT calculation used specifically for this study. Quality assurance of treatment plan was performed in both HDR-BT and HT. The plans were then compared using organ at risk (OAR) maximum doses and the conformity index CI. Radiation oncologists assessed their quality using their routine workflow evaluation plan.

Results: Twelve patients were selected for the inclusion in this study. HT provided more consistent target coverage than HDR-BT, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) at t-test. HT showed higher CIs and maximum dose for the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and lens in the homolateral part. Radiation oncologists preferred the overall quality of HT treatment due to its superior PTV coverage, especially for convex surfaces, while maintaining effective OAR sparing. HDR-BT is preferred when concave surfaces are present.

Conclusion: HT offers more conformal treatment, although some OAR parameters are statistically significantly better with HDR-BT, which may also be superior for complex geometries.

hdr近距离放疗与断层放疗治疗头颈部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的比较。
目的:探讨高剂量率近距离放射治疗(HDR-BT)与螺旋断层放射治疗(HT)的治疗方案并进行比较。重点是眼部辐射敏感器官附近的小靶体积,以评估这些技术在治疗皮肤癌方面的优势。方法:回顾性观察分析包括2019年至2023年间接受HDR-BT Freiburg皮瓣治疗的皮肤癌患者。一位放射肿瘤学专家勾勒出计划靶体积(ptv)的轮廓,并用不透明锡线标记出其可见的延伸。每位患者有两种治疗方案:单独形状的HDR-BT表面模具和专门用于本研究的HT计算。对HDR-BT和HT治疗方案进行质量保证。然后使用器官危险(OAR)最大剂量和符合性指数CI对这些方案进行比较。放射肿瘤学家使用他们的常规工作流程评估计划来评估他们的质量。结果:12例患者入选本研究。与HDR-BT相比,HT提供了更一致的靶标覆盖,差异有统计学意义(p )结论:HT提供了更适形的治疗,尽管HDR-BT的一些桨叶参数在统计学上更好,但对于复杂的几何形状也可能更优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信