Knowledge of Male Infertility and Acceptance of Medical Assistance Reproductive Technology Among Fertile and Infertile Senegalese Men.

IF 2 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S487854
Oumar Gaye, Khadidiatou Ba, Mouhamed Diallo, Awa Niasse, Amdy Laye Counta, Modou Ndiaye, Moustapha Gning, Ablaye Gueye, Papa Ahmed Fall
{"title":"Knowledge of Male Infertility and Acceptance of Medical Assistance Reproductive Technology Among Fertile and Infertile Senegalese Men.","authors":"Oumar Gaye, Khadidiatou Ba, Mouhamed Diallo, Awa Niasse, Amdy Laye Counta, Modou Ndiaye, Moustapha Gning, Ablaye Gueye, Papa Ahmed Fall","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S487854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of our study was to examine the knowledge of male infertility and the acceptance of assisted reproductive technology (ART) methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study from April 2023 to August 2023 in a center in Dakar. Included in the study were male patients aged 18 and older followed for male infertility (group 1) and fertile patients of the same age as those in group 1 (group 2). We designed a questionnaire assessing the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents, their knowledge of male infertility, knowledge of ART, its acceptability, and the source of information about male infertility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample size consisted of 119 respondents for each group. The average age of respondents in both groups was 41.24 ± 8.42 years. Fifty-eight percent of respondents in group 1 were referred by their wife's gynecologist. Fifty-four percent of respondents in group 1 had a good knowledge of male infertility, and 42.86% had average knowledge of male infertility. The majority of respondents in group 1 (42.9%) and group 2 (40.3%) did not know the duration that defines infertility. Fifty-seven percent of respondents in Group 1 and 81.5% of respondents in Group 2 did not know what assisted reproductive technology meant. Eighty-six percent of respondents in Group 1 agreed to use ART for procreation. The majority of respondents in Group 1 (54.6%) and Group 2 (58.8%) attributed a success rate of between 35% and 75% to ART.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infertile men had better knowledge of male fertility than fertile men. Respondents in both groups, as well as the advanced age of men did not know the duration defining infertility. Poor knowledge of ART was also observed among respondents in both groups, and a better acceptance of ART methods was noted among infertile men.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":"16 ","pages":"343-355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S487854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of our study was to examine the knowledge of male infertility and the acceptance of assisted reproductive technology (ART) methods.

Patients and methods: We conducted a descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study from April 2023 to August 2023 in a center in Dakar. Included in the study were male patients aged 18 and older followed for male infertility (group 1) and fertile patients of the same age as those in group 1 (group 2). We designed a questionnaire assessing the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents, their knowledge of male infertility, knowledge of ART, its acceptability, and the source of information about male infertility.

Results: Our sample size consisted of 119 respondents for each group. The average age of respondents in both groups was 41.24 ± 8.42 years. Fifty-eight percent of respondents in group 1 were referred by their wife's gynecologist. Fifty-four percent of respondents in group 1 had a good knowledge of male infertility, and 42.86% had average knowledge of male infertility. The majority of respondents in group 1 (42.9%) and group 2 (40.3%) did not know the duration that defines infertility. Fifty-seven percent of respondents in Group 1 and 81.5% of respondents in Group 2 did not know what assisted reproductive technology meant. Eighty-six percent of respondents in Group 1 agreed to use ART for procreation. The majority of respondents in Group 1 (54.6%) and Group 2 (58.8%) attributed a success rate of between 35% and 75% to ART.

Conclusion: Infertile men had better knowledge of male fertility than fertile men. Respondents in both groups, as well as the advanced age of men did not know the duration defining infertility. Poor knowledge of ART was also observed among respondents in both groups, and a better acceptance of ART methods was noted among infertile men.

塞内加尔男性对男性不育症的了解和对医疗辅助生殖技术的接受。
目的:本研究的目的是了解男性不育的知识和对辅助生殖技术(ART)方法的接受程度。患者和方法:我们于2023年4月至2023年8月在达喀尔的一个中心进行了一项描述性、对比性、横断面研究。研究对象包括18岁及以上的男性不育症患者(第一组)和同龄的可生育患者(第二组)。我们设计了一份调查问卷,评估受访者的社会人口学特征、男性不育症知识、抗逆转录病毒治疗知识、可接受性以及男性不育症信息来源。结果:我们的样本量为每组119名受访者。两组患者平均年龄为41.24±8.42岁。第一组58%的受访者是由妻子的妇科医生介绍的。第一组受访者中有54%的人对男性不育症有良好的了解,42.86%的人对男性不育症有一般的了解。第1组(42.9%)和第2组(40.3%)的大多数应答者不知道定义不孕症的持续时间。第一组57%的受访者和第二组81.5%的受访者不知道辅助生殖技术的含义。第一组中86%的受访者同意使用抗逆转录病毒治疗生育。第1组(54.6%)和第2组(58.8%)的大多数受访者将35%至75%的成功率归因于抗逆转录病毒治疗。结论:不育男性对男性生育能力的认识高于有生育能力男性。两组的应答者,以及老年男性都不知道定义不孕症的持续时间。在两组受访者中也观察到对抗逆转录病毒疗法的知识贫乏,并且注意到不育男性对抗逆转录病毒疗法的接受程度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信