Bartłomiej Tołpa, Wiesław Paja, Paweł Jakubczyk, Kornelia Łach, Elżbieta Trojnar, Agnieszka Gala-Błądzińska, Aneta Kowal, Bartosz Klębowski, Jozef Cebulski, Joanna Depciuch
{"title":"Differentiation of glioblastoma G4 and two types of meningiomas using FTIR spectra and machine learning.","authors":"Bartłomiej Tołpa, Wiesław Paja, Paweł Jakubczyk, Kornelia Łach, Elżbieta Trojnar, Agnieszka Gala-Błądzińska, Aneta Kowal, Bartosz Klębowski, Jozef Cebulski, Joanna Depciuch","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2024.115754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain tumors are among the most dangerous, due to their location in the organ that governs all life processes. Moreover, the high differentiation of these poses a challenge in diagnostics. Therefore, this study focused on the chemical differentiation of glioblastoma G4 (GBM) and two types of meningiomas (atypical - MAtyp and angiomatous - MAng) were done using Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectroscopy, combined with statistical, multivariate, machine learning and rate of spectrum changes methods. The positions of all analyzed peaks differed between GBM and meningiomas. However, for two types of meningiomas, only shift of peaks corresponding to CH<sub>2</sub> bending vibrations, symmetric stretching vibrations of CH<sub>2,</sub> amide A, amide I, CO lipids vibrations, asymmetric stretching vibrations of CH<sub>3</sub> were observed. Principal Component Analysis showed clear differentiation between GBM and the meningiomas. Decision tree clearly showed that wavenumbers corresponding to CO lipids vibrations provided the highest differentiation between GBM and meningiomas tissues, while amide I for two types of meningiomas. The accuracy and specificity of the results for GBM and meningiomas were more than 90 %, while for MAtyp and MAng, these parameters were around 80 %.</p>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"115754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2024.115754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Brain tumors are among the most dangerous, due to their location in the organ that governs all life processes. Moreover, the high differentiation of these poses a challenge in diagnostics. Therefore, this study focused on the chemical differentiation of glioblastoma G4 (GBM) and two types of meningiomas (atypical - MAtyp and angiomatous - MAng) were done using Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectroscopy, combined with statistical, multivariate, machine learning and rate of spectrum changes methods. The positions of all analyzed peaks differed between GBM and meningiomas. However, for two types of meningiomas, only shift of peaks corresponding to CH2 bending vibrations, symmetric stretching vibrations of CH2, amide A, amide I, CO lipids vibrations, asymmetric stretching vibrations of CH3 were observed. Principal Component Analysis showed clear differentiation between GBM and the meningiomas. Decision tree clearly showed that wavenumbers corresponding to CO lipids vibrations provided the highest differentiation between GBM and meningiomas tissues, while amide I for two types of meningiomas. The accuracy and specificity of the results for GBM and meningiomas were more than 90 %, while for MAtyp and MAng, these parameters were around 80 %.
期刊介绍:
The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field.
The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology.
The journal has been particularly active in:
-Analytical techniques for biological molecules-
Aptamer selection and utilization-
Biosensors-
Chromatography-
Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis-
Electrochemical methods-
Electrophoresis-
Enzyme characterization methods-
Immunological approaches-
Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids-
Metabolomics-
Nano level techniques-
Optical spectroscopy in all its forms.
The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.