Device endothelialization and morphology assessments at 1 year using computed tomography angiography: comparison of traditional with novel puncturable atrial septal defect occluders.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yanxing Fang, Kai Hou, Dawei Lin, Daxin Zhou, Wenzhi Pan, Junbo Ge
{"title":"Device endothelialization and morphology assessments at 1 year using computed tomography angiography: comparison of traditional with novel puncturable atrial septal defect occluders.","authors":"Yanxing Fang, Kai Hou, Dawei Lin, Daxin Zhou, Wenzhi Pan, Junbo Ge","doi":"10.1186/s12872-024-04438-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complete endothelialization is often not achieved within 6 months after implantation of an atrial septal defect (ASD) occluder, which may lead to microthrombus or thrombosis. This study aimed to assess the endothelialization and morphology of a novel puncturable ASD occluder (ReAces) compared with traditional occluders 1 year post-implantation using computed tomography angiography (CTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients from each group in a randomized controlled trial comparing ReAces with traditional occluders were included at the 1-year follow-up at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Baseline characteristics and procedural data were recorded. CTA was performed to assess the device morphology and degree of endothelialization. Independent samples t-test and Fisher's exact test were primarily used to compare the above data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each patient received a single device and had no residual shunts. There were no differences in defect size (15.3 ± 4.0 mm vs. 15.3 ± 4.7 mm, p = 1.00) or occluder size (21.2 ± 4.4 mm vs. 21.5 ± 5.3 mm, p = 0.882) between the two groups. At the 1-year follow-up CTA, the central region thickness (4.2 mm ± 0.9 mm vs. 7.8 mm ± 2.4 mm, p < 0.0001), left atrial device-occupied volume (1863.3 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 404.4 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 4764.4 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 2321.2 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.001), and device compression rates (10.1 ± 4.8% vs. 17.5 ± 5.6%, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the experimental group. All occluders in the experimental group achieved complete endothelialization, whereas in the control group, 7 patients did not (100% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with traditional occluders, ReAces presented a significantly greater complete endothelialization rate, lower central region thickness, lower left atrial device-occupied volume, and lower device compression rates at 1 year post-implantation by CTA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifying number: NCT05371366. Date of registration: 04/05/2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04438-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complete endothelialization is often not achieved within 6 months after implantation of an atrial septal defect (ASD) occluder, which may lead to microthrombus or thrombosis. This study aimed to assess the endothelialization and morphology of a novel puncturable ASD occluder (ReAces) compared with traditional occluders 1 year post-implantation using computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Methods: Fifteen patients from each group in a randomized controlled trial comparing ReAces with traditional occluders were included at the 1-year follow-up at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Baseline characteristics and procedural data were recorded. CTA was performed to assess the device morphology and degree of endothelialization. Independent samples t-test and Fisher's exact test were primarily used to compare the above data.

Results: Each patient received a single device and had no residual shunts. There were no differences in defect size (15.3 ± 4.0 mm vs. 15.3 ± 4.7 mm, p = 1.00) or occluder size (21.2 ± 4.4 mm vs. 21.5 ± 5.3 mm, p = 0.882) between the two groups. At the 1-year follow-up CTA, the central region thickness (4.2 mm ± 0.9 mm vs. 7.8 mm ± 2.4 mm, p < 0.0001), left atrial device-occupied volume (1863.3 mm2 ± 404.4 mm2 vs. 4764.4 mm2 ± 2321.2 mm2, p < 0.001), and device compression rates (10.1 ± 4.8% vs. 17.5 ± 5.6%, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the experimental group. All occluders in the experimental group achieved complete endothelialization, whereas in the control group, 7 patients did not (100% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.006).

Conclusions: Compared with traditional occluders, ReAces presented a significantly greater complete endothelialization rate, lower central region thickness, lower left atrial device-occupied volume, and lower device compression rates at 1 year post-implantation by CTA.

Trial registration: Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifying number: NCT05371366. Date of registration: 04/05/2022.

背景:房间隔缺损(ASD)封堵器植入后 6 个月内往往无法实现完全内皮化,这可能导致微血栓或血栓形成。本研究旨在使用计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CTA)评估新型可穿刺房间隔缺损封堵器(ReAces)与传统封堵器在植入一年后的内皮化和形态:在复旦大学附属中山医院进行的ReAces与传统封堵器的随机对照试验中,每组各有15名患者接受了1年随访。记录了基线特征和手术数据。进行了 CTA 评估装置形态和内皮化程度。独立样本 t 检验和费雪精确检验主要用于比较上述数据:结果:每位患者都接受了单个装置,没有残余分流。两组患者的缺损大小(15.3 ± 4.0 mm vs. 15.3 ± 4.7 mm,p = 1.00)或闭塞器大小(21.2 ± 4.4 mm vs. 21.5 ± 5.3 mm,p = 0.882)没有差异。在为期 1 年的随访 CTA 中,中心区厚度(4.2 毫米±0.9 毫米 vs. 7.8 毫米±2.4 毫米,p 2 ± 404.4 平方毫米 vs. 4764.4 平方毫米 ± 2321.2 平方毫米,p 结论:与传统封堵器相比,CTA 封堵器的厚度更小:与传统封堵器相比,ReAces的完全内皮化率明显更高,中心区厚度更低,左心房器械占用体积更小,植入后1年CTA显示的器械压迫率更低:试验注册试验登记:ClinicalTrials.gov.唯一标识号:NCT05371366:NCT05371366。注册日期:04/05/2022.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信