How many L2 word meanings can learners recall? A latent trait approach to vocabulary size estimation

IF 3.6 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Akira Hamada, Yuko Hoshino, Masumi Kojima, Kazumi Aizawa, Tatsuo Iso, Yuichiro Kobayashi
{"title":"How many L2 word meanings can learners recall? A latent trait approach to vocabulary size estimation","authors":"Akira Hamada, Yuko Hoshino, Masumi Kojima, Kazumi Aizawa, Tatsuo Iso, Yuichiro Kobayashi","doi":"10.1093/applin/amae087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the size of meaning-recall vocabulary knowledge and its variations across word-frequency and second language (L2) proficiency levels. Despite the extensive research history in determining lexical coverage and thresholds for effective L2 use, much of the evidence is based on measures of meaning-recognition vocabulary knowledge. Using a latent-trait approach, we calculated the probability that learners could recall the meaning of each word in a vocabulary size test. Differences in vocabulary size between recognition and recall formats were analyzed across word-frequency bands and L2 proficiency levels. Results indicate that most learners struggle to recall the meanings of word families beyond the second-most frequent band. Moreover, the gap between meaning-recall and meaning-recognition vocabulary sizes was substantial and expanded as word-frequency and L2 proficiency levels decreased. These findings contribute to defining realistic L2 vocabulary teaching goals and selecting appropriate teaching methods. Construct-irrelevant measurements lead to a misunderstanding of L2 lexical proficiency, emphasizing the importance of test format selection according to the developmental stages of learners’ vocabulary knowledge.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the size of meaning-recall vocabulary knowledge and its variations across word-frequency and second language (L2) proficiency levels. Despite the extensive research history in determining lexical coverage and thresholds for effective L2 use, much of the evidence is based on measures of meaning-recognition vocabulary knowledge. Using a latent-trait approach, we calculated the probability that learners could recall the meaning of each word in a vocabulary size test. Differences in vocabulary size between recognition and recall formats were analyzed across word-frequency bands and L2 proficiency levels. Results indicate that most learners struggle to recall the meanings of word families beyond the second-most frequent band. Moreover, the gap between meaning-recall and meaning-recognition vocabulary sizes was substantial and expanded as word-frequency and L2 proficiency levels decreased. These findings contribute to defining realistic L2 vocabulary teaching goals and selecting appropriate teaching methods. Construct-irrelevant measurements lead to a misunderstanding of L2 lexical proficiency, emphasizing the importance of test format selection according to the developmental stages of learners’ vocabulary knowledge.
学习者能回忆起多少 L2 词义?估算词汇量的潜在特质方法
本研究探讨了意义回忆词汇知识的大小及其在词频和第二语言熟练程度上的变化。尽管在确定有效二语使用的词汇覆盖范围和阈值方面有广泛的研究历史,但许多证据都是基于对意义识别词汇知识的测量。使用潜在特征方法,我们计算了学习者在词汇量测试中回忆起每个单词含义的概率。分析了不同频带和二语熟练程度的识别和回忆格式在词汇量上的差异。结果表明,大多数学习者很难回忆起第二个最常见频带以外的单词族的意思。此外,意义记忆词汇量和意义识别词汇量之间的差距是显著的,并且随着词频和二语熟练程度的降低而扩大。这些发现有助于确定现实的二语词汇教学目标和选择合适的教学方法。结构无关的测量导致了对二语词汇熟练程度的误解,强调了根据学习者词汇知识发展阶段选择测试格式的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Linguistics
Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信