Substitution of soil urea fertilization to foliar nano urea fertilization decreases growth and yield of rice and wheat

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Rajeev Sikka, Anu Kalia, Radha Ahuja, Simranpreet Kaur Sidhu, P. Chaitra
{"title":"Substitution of soil urea fertilization to foliar nano urea fertilization decreases growth and yield of rice and wheat","authors":"Rajeev Sikka, Anu Kalia, Radha Ahuja, Simranpreet Kaur Sidhu, P. Chaitra","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07157-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Conventional nitrogen (N) fertilizers are prone to losses through leaching, volatilization, and denitrification, leading to low N-use efficiency (NUE). This study evaluates a new urea nano-formulation of IFFCO (Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative Limited) as a potential substitute for commercial urea and its effects on rice and wheat performance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A two-year field study evaluated the impact of two foliar sprays of IFFCO nano-urea (4 ml/l) in combination with 0% and 50% recommended doses of N-fertilizer (RDN) on the performance of rice and wheat grown in rotation. Agronomic parameters were measured every 30 days, and grain yield was recorded at harvest.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The application of two sprays of nano urea + 50% RDN significantly reduced the grain yield of rice and wheat by 13 and 17.2%, respectively, compared with 100% RDN application to soil. Additionally, chlorophyll content (SPAD), dry matter accumulation, tiller density, root growth, and macronutrient content decreased in both the test crops. The nano-urea + 50% RDN treatment exhibited 35% and 24% reduction in grain protein content in rice and wheat, respectively. The activity of glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase in rice leaves decreased by 28.6 and 94.4%, respectively, compared to100% RDN treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Nano-urea in combination with 50% RDN did not improve nitrogen use efficiency as claimed. More research studies are required to establish the correct crop-specific agronomy of this formulation. Thus, the focus should be on improving existing nitrogen management strategies and research to refine nano-urea formulations for better performance under field conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"327 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07157-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Conventional nitrogen (N) fertilizers are prone to losses through leaching, volatilization, and denitrification, leading to low N-use efficiency (NUE). This study evaluates a new urea nano-formulation of IFFCO (Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative Limited) as a potential substitute for commercial urea and its effects on rice and wheat performance.

Methods

A two-year field study evaluated the impact of two foliar sprays of IFFCO nano-urea (4 ml/l) in combination with 0% and 50% recommended doses of N-fertilizer (RDN) on the performance of rice and wheat grown in rotation. Agronomic parameters were measured every 30 days, and grain yield was recorded at harvest.

Results

The application of two sprays of nano urea + 50% RDN significantly reduced the grain yield of rice and wheat by 13 and 17.2%, respectively, compared with 100% RDN application to soil. Additionally, chlorophyll content (SPAD), dry matter accumulation, tiller density, root growth, and macronutrient content decreased in both the test crops. The nano-urea + 50% RDN treatment exhibited 35% and 24% reduction in grain protein content in rice and wheat, respectively. The activity of glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase in rice leaves decreased by 28.6 and 94.4%, respectively, compared to100% RDN treatment.

Conclusion

Nano-urea in combination with 50% RDN did not improve nitrogen use efficiency as claimed. More research studies are required to establish the correct crop-specific agronomy of this formulation. Thus, the focus should be on improving existing nitrogen management strategies and research to refine nano-urea formulations for better performance under field conditions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信