Exploring the Nature and Challenges Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia Responding to an Inflight Medical Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-12-26 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.76420
Adil Khalil Hussien, Saif Ali Aljaghwani, Ibrahim Mohammed Albarrak, Abdullah Rodaini Alanazi, Marwan Mohammed Althubaiti, Faisal Abdullah Alqahtani, Ibrahim Abdullah Alharthi, Hussain Abdullah Alqahtani, Khalid Saeed Alshalawi, Mohammed Faris Alanazi
{"title":"Exploring the Nature and Challenges Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia Responding to an Inflight Medical Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Adil Khalil Hussien, Saif Ali Aljaghwani, Ibrahim Mohammed Albarrak, Abdullah Rodaini Alanazi, Marwan Mohammed Althubaiti, Faisal Abdullah Alqahtani, Ibrahim Abdullah Alharthi, Hussain Abdullah Alqahtani, Khalid Saeed Alshalawi, Mohammed Faris Alanazi","doi":"10.7759/cureus.76420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background  Inflight medical emergencies (IMEs) present a challenging situation due to the availability of limited medical resources and a complex cabin environment. The physicians have an ethical responsibility to aid in such situations. This study aims to assess the attitudes of Saudi physicians regarding IMEs. Methods  A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical interns and postgraduate physicians in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via a structured online questionnaire distributed through professional networks and social media. The survey evaluated physicians' confidence, preparedness, and barriers to volunteering in an IME.  Results  A total of 368 respondents were included in the study, with a plurality (42.4%, n = 156) in the 30-39 years age group. The proportion of males was 55.2% (n = 203). Among participants, 67.1% (n = 247) had encountered an IME, and 62% (n = 228) had assisted in such a situation. Regarding the nature of IME, 17.9% (n = 66) of the respondents reported respiratory emergency (e.g., bronchospasm). Participants with prior medical emergency experience showed significantly higher scores than those without (54.64 ± 7.81 vs. 49.30 ± 7.10, p < 0.001). Younger physicians (<30 years) displayed the highest confidence scores (54.85 ± 7.03), while those ≥60 years reported the lowest (46.50 ± 4.94, p < 0.01). Physicians with less experience (less than five years) had higher scores compared to their more experienced counterparts (54.69 ± 7.16 vs. 52.25 ± 5.75, p = 0.039). Barriers to volunteering included lack of training (58.6%, n = 215) and legal concerns (61.1%, n = 227), while 67.6% (n = 249) highlighted the need for additional training as a potential motivator.  Conclusion  Overall, the majority of the participants included in our study were willing to aid in an IME. Furthermore, being younger, less experienced, and having prior emergency experience were significant factors in determining the decision to aid in an IME.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"16 12","pages":"e76420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Inflight medical emergencies (IMEs) present a challenging situation due to the availability of limited medical resources and a complex cabin environment. The physicians have an ethical responsibility to aid in such situations. This study aims to assess the attitudes of Saudi physicians regarding IMEs. Methods  A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical interns and postgraduate physicians in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via a structured online questionnaire distributed through professional networks and social media. The survey evaluated physicians' confidence, preparedness, and barriers to volunteering in an IME.  Results  A total of 368 respondents were included in the study, with a plurality (42.4%, n = 156) in the 30-39 years age group. The proportion of males was 55.2% (n = 203). Among participants, 67.1% (n = 247) had encountered an IME, and 62% (n = 228) had assisted in such a situation. Regarding the nature of IME, 17.9% (n = 66) of the respondents reported respiratory emergency (e.g., bronchospasm). Participants with prior medical emergency experience showed significantly higher scores than those without (54.64 ± 7.81 vs. 49.30 ± 7.10, p < 0.001). Younger physicians (<30 years) displayed the highest confidence scores (54.85 ± 7.03), while those ≥60 years reported the lowest (46.50 ± 4.94, p < 0.01). Physicians with less experience (less than five years) had higher scores compared to their more experienced counterparts (54.69 ± 7.16 vs. 52.25 ± 5.75, p = 0.039). Barriers to volunteering included lack of training (58.6%, n = 215) and legal concerns (61.1%, n = 227), while 67.6% (n = 249) highlighted the need for additional training as a potential motivator.  Conclusion  Overall, the majority of the participants included in our study were willing to aid in an IME. Furthermore, being younger, less experienced, and having prior emergency experience were significant factors in determining the decision to aid in an IME.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信