Comparison of genotyping assays for detection of targeted CRISPR/Cas mutagenesis in highly polyploid sugarcane.

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in genome editing Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgeed.2024.1505844
Eleanor J Brant, David May, Ayman Eid, Fredy Altpeter
{"title":"Comparison of genotyping assays for detection of targeted CRISPR/Cas mutagenesis in highly polyploid sugarcane.","authors":"Eleanor J Brant, David May, Ayman Eid, Fredy Altpeter","doi":"10.3389/fgeed.2024.1505844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sugarcane (<i>Saccharum</i> spp.) is an important biofuel feedstock and a leading source of global table sugar. <i>Saccharum</i> hybrid cultivars are highly polyploid (2n = 100-130), containing large numbers of functionally redundant hom(e)ologs in their genomes. Genome editing with sequence-specific nucleases holds tremendous promise for sugarcane breeding. However, identification of plants with the desired level of co-editing within a pool of primary transformants can be difficult. While DNA sequencing provides direct evidence of targeted mutagenesis, it is cost-prohibitive as a primary screening method in sugarcane and most other methods of identifying mutant lines have not been optimized for use in highly polyploid species. In this study, non-sequencing methods of mutant screening, including capillary electrophoresis (CE), Cas9 RNP assay, and high-resolution melt analysis (HRMA), were compared to assess their potential for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutant screening in sugarcane. These assays were used to analyze sugarcane lines containing mutations at one or more of six sgRNA target sites. All three methods distinguished edited lines from wild type, with co-mutation frequencies ranging from 2% to 100%. Cas9 RNP assays were able to identify mutant sugarcane lines with as low as 3.2% co-mutation frequency, and samples could be scored based on undigested band intensity. CE was highlighted as the most comprehensive assay, delivering precise information on both mutagenesis frequency and indel size to a 1 bp resolution across all six targets. This represents an economical and comprehensive alternative to sequencing-based genotyping methods which could be applied in other polyploid species.</p>","PeriodicalId":73086,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in genome editing","volume":"6 ","pages":"1505844"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2024.1505844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is an important biofuel feedstock and a leading source of global table sugar. Saccharum hybrid cultivars are highly polyploid (2n = 100-130), containing large numbers of functionally redundant hom(e)ologs in their genomes. Genome editing with sequence-specific nucleases holds tremendous promise for sugarcane breeding. However, identification of plants with the desired level of co-editing within a pool of primary transformants can be difficult. While DNA sequencing provides direct evidence of targeted mutagenesis, it is cost-prohibitive as a primary screening method in sugarcane and most other methods of identifying mutant lines have not been optimized for use in highly polyploid species. In this study, non-sequencing methods of mutant screening, including capillary electrophoresis (CE), Cas9 RNP assay, and high-resolution melt analysis (HRMA), were compared to assess their potential for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutant screening in sugarcane. These assays were used to analyze sugarcane lines containing mutations at one or more of six sgRNA target sites. All three methods distinguished edited lines from wild type, with co-mutation frequencies ranging from 2% to 100%. Cas9 RNP assays were able to identify mutant sugarcane lines with as low as 3.2% co-mutation frequency, and samples could be scored based on undigested band intensity. CE was highlighted as the most comprehensive assay, delivering precise information on both mutagenesis frequency and indel size to a 1 bp resolution across all six targets. This represents an economical and comprehensive alternative to sequencing-based genotyping methods which could be applied in other polyploid species.

高多倍体甘蔗CRISPR/Cas靶向诱变检测的基因分型方法比较。
甘蔗(Saccharum spp.)是重要的生物燃料原料,也是全球食糖的主要来源。糖精杂交品种是高度多倍体(2n = 100-130),其基因组中含有大量功能冗余的同源物。用序列特异性核酸酶进行基因组编辑对甘蔗育种具有巨大的前景。然而,在一组初级转化体中鉴定具有所需的共同编辑水平的植物可能很困难。虽然DNA测序提供了靶向诱变的直接证据,但它作为甘蔗的主要筛选方法成本过高,而且大多数其他鉴定突变系的方法尚未优化用于高度多倍体物种。在本研究中,比较了毛细管电泳(CE)、Cas9 RNP测定和高分辨率熔融分析(HRMA)等非测序突变体筛选方法,以评估它们在甘蔗中CRISPR/Cas9介导的突变体筛选中的潜力。这些检测方法用于分析在六个sgRNA靶点中的一个或多个位点上含有突变的甘蔗系。这三种方法都能将编辑过的系与野生型区分开来,共突变频率从2%到100%不等。Cas9 RNP检测能够识别出共突变频率低至3.2%的突变甘蔗系,并且可以根据未消化带强度对样品进行评分。CE被认为是最全面的检测方法,在所有6个靶标中提供突变频率和indel大小的精确信息,分辨率达到1bp。这代表了一种经济和全面的替代基于测序的基因分型方法,可应用于其他多倍体物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信