The Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Iron Deficiency: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Abstract

Background: Iron deficiency (ID) often coexists with heart failure (HF), and its prevalence increases with the severity of HF. Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has been associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, functional capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with HF and ID. However, while earlier studies showed favorable results, more recent studies have failed to demonstrate significant improvements in outcomes for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and ID. This meta-analysis seeks to provide updated insights into the effectiveness and safety of FCM compared to placebo/standard of care (SoC) among patients with HFrEF and ID/iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from inception to December 2023, utilizing databases such as MEDLINE (via PubMed), Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ScienceDirect portal. A statistical analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 with a random-effects model. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios (OR), while continuous outcomes were presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test. Results: The final analysis included data from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comprising 5132 patients. Our findings indicate a significant reduction in total HF hospitalizations among patients with HFrEF and ID/IDA treated with FCM compared to those receiving the placebo or SoC, with an OR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.40 to 0.88, p < 0.010). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in the total number of deaths between the FCM and placebo/SoC groups (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.03, p = 0.09), non-HF hospitalizations (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.25, p = 0.24), or the composite outcome of cardiovascular hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.04, p = 0.07). Regarding functional capacity, as assessed by the change in 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, no significant improvement was found, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 14.03 (95% CI: -10.94 to 38.99, p = 0.27). QoL, measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, also did not show significant enhancement, with a WMD of 3.85 (95% CI: -0.55 to 8.24, p = 0.09). Furthermore, the safety analysis revealed no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between the FCM and placebo/SoC groups, with an OR of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.49 to 1.10, p = 0.13). Conclusions: In patients with HFrEF and IDA, treatment with intravenous FCM significantly lowers the risk of total HF hospitalizations but does not appear to affect functional capacity, QoL, or mortality.