[Health-promoting activities and facilitating/inhibiting factors in hospitals, clinics, and nursing care facilities: Public interest corporation survey results].

Teruko Kawabata, Hidenori Uda, Masakazu Nakamura, Takashi Yamada, Noriko Sasaki, Yuichi Imanaka
{"title":"[Health-promoting activities and facilitating/inhibiting factors in hospitals, clinics, and nursing care facilities: Public interest corporation survey results].","authors":"Teruko Kawabata, Hidenori Uda, Masakazu Nakamura, Takashi Yamada, Noriko Sasaki, Yuichi Imanaka","doi":"10.11236/jph.24-074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Medical and nursing care services within community-based integrated care systems are vital in community health. This study aimed to assess the current status of health-promoting activities across hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes operated by the Japan Association for Development of Community Medicine and explore differences depending on the type of facility and strategies for expanding these activities.Methods Between April 2022 and September 2023, we conducted web-based surveys, followed by telephone and email interviews. The survey covered three main areas; health-promoting activities for patients/users, the community, and staff (options), willingness to expand activities (10-point scale), and facilitating and inhibiting factors (open-ended responses). Responses were analyzed according to facility type, and activities were categorized according to the 2020 Standards for Health-Promoting Hospitals and Health Services (The 2020 HPH Standards).Results The response rate was 100%. Activities were implemented across all facilities. The percentages of facilities that implemented activities in hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes were as follows; patients/users (96.0, 84.5, 94.4, P = 0.011), community (96.0, 83.3, 100.0, P < 0.001), and staff (100.0, 72.9, 94.4, P < 0.001). The implementation rates were significantly lower in clinics than in hospitals and nursing homes. The mean number of activities in small clinics with < 50 staff (S) was significantly lower than that in large clinics with > 50 staff (L) for patients/users (S, L, difference) (4.1, 6.2, P = 0.034), community (4.9, 9.1, P < 0.001), and staff (1.6, 3.8, P < 0.001). Willingness did not vary by facility type (median of 7.0); however, conviction, as a determinant of willingness, was slightly higher in clinics and nursing homes than in hospitals (hospital = 7.0, clinics and nursing homes = 8.0). The most common facilitating factor for hospitals was \"development of organizational structure,\" such as the establishment of a promotion committee, whereas for clinics and nursing homes, it was the \"provision of educational materials and know-how.\" The most common inhibiting factor was \"increasing workload.\" These activities aligned with almost all 2020 HPH standards; however, the evaluation system needed improvement.Conclusion All facilities are implementing health-promoting activities according to the 2020 HPH standards and have expressed eagerness to expand their activities. Developing organizational structures, ensuring the profitability of activities, developing evaluation indicators for measuring results, and establishing an evaluation system are crucial for expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Medical and nursing care services within community-based integrated care systems are vital in community health. This study aimed to assess the current status of health-promoting activities across hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes operated by the Japan Association for Development of Community Medicine and explore differences depending on the type of facility and strategies for expanding these activities.Methods Between April 2022 and September 2023, we conducted web-based surveys, followed by telephone and email interviews. The survey covered three main areas; health-promoting activities for patients/users, the community, and staff (options), willingness to expand activities (10-point scale), and facilitating and inhibiting factors (open-ended responses). Responses were analyzed according to facility type, and activities were categorized according to the 2020 Standards for Health-Promoting Hospitals and Health Services (The 2020 HPH Standards).Results The response rate was 100%. Activities were implemented across all facilities. The percentages of facilities that implemented activities in hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes were as follows; patients/users (96.0, 84.5, 94.4, P = 0.011), community (96.0, 83.3, 100.0, P < 0.001), and staff (100.0, 72.9, 94.4, P < 0.001). The implementation rates were significantly lower in clinics than in hospitals and nursing homes. The mean number of activities in small clinics with < 50 staff (S) was significantly lower than that in large clinics with > 50 staff (L) for patients/users (S, L, difference) (4.1, 6.2, P = 0.034), community (4.9, 9.1, P < 0.001), and staff (1.6, 3.8, P < 0.001). Willingness did not vary by facility type (median of 7.0); however, conviction, as a determinant of willingness, was slightly higher in clinics and nursing homes than in hospitals (hospital = 7.0, clinics and nursing homes = 8.0). The most common facilitating factor for hospitals was "development of organizational structure," such as the establishment of a promotion committee, whereas for clinics and nursing homes, it was the "provision of educational materials and know-how." The most common inhibiting factor was "increasing workload." These activities aligned with almost all 2020 HPH standards; however, the evaluation system needed improvement.Conclusion All facilities are implementing health-promoting activities according to the 2020 HPH standards and have expressed eagerness to expand their activities. Developing organizational structures, ensuring the profitability of activities, developing evaluation indicators for measuring results, and establishing an evaluation system are crucial for expansion.

[医院、诊所、护理机构的健康促进活动及促进/抑制因素:公益公司调查结果]。
目的社区综合护理系统中的医疗护理服务对社区卫生至关重要。本研究旨在评估日本社区医学发展协会经营的医院、诊所和养老院促进健康活动的现状,并探讨根据设施类型和扩大这些活动的战略的差异。方法于2022年4月至2023年9月进行网络调查,随后进行电话和电子邮件访谈。调查涵盖三个主要领域;促进患者/使用者、社区和工作人员健康的活动(选项)、扩大活动的意愿(10分制)以及促进和抑制因素(开放式回答)。根据设施类型对反馈进行分析,并根据《2020年促进健康医院和卫生服务标准》(2020年HPH标准)对活动进行分类。结果有效率为100%。活动在所有设施中实施。在医院、诊所和养老院开展活动的设施百分比如下:患者/使用者(96.0、84.5、94.4,P = 0.011)、社区(96.0、83.3、100.0,P < 0.001)和工作人员(100.0、72.9、94.4,P < 0.001)。诊所的执行率明显低于医院和疗养院。人员少于50人的小型诊所的患者/使用者(S, L,差值)、社区(4.9,9.1,P < 0.001)和工作人员(1.6,3.8,P < 0.001)的平均活动次数显著低于人员少于50人的大型诊所(L,差值)(4.1,6.2,P = 0.034)。意愿没有因设施类型而异(中位数为7.0);然而,作为意愿的决定因素,信念在诊所和疗养院的比例略高于医院(医院= 7.0,诊所和疗养院= 8.0)。对于医院来说,最常见的促进因素是“组织结构的发展”,例如建立促进委员会,而对于诊所和养老院来说,最常见的促进因素是“提供教育材料和专业知识”。最常见的抑制因素是“工作量增加”。这些活动几乎符合所有2020年卫生和健康标准;但是,评价体系还有待完善。结论各医院均按2020年卫生健康标准开展健康促进活动,并表示积极开展健康促进活动。发展组织结构,确保活动的盈利性,制定衡量结果的评价指标,建立评价体系是扩大的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信