Hope is Not a Strategy: Key Lessons from COVID-19 for Future Health Crises.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S495041
Søren Valgreen Knudsen, Inge Kristensen, Nanna Kure-Biegel, Mickael Bech, Hanne Agerbak, Camilla Plambeck Hansen, Christina Mohr-Jensen, Jan Brink Valentin, Michael Bang Petersen, Jan Mainz
{"title":"Hope is Not a Strategy: Key Lessons from COVID-19 for Future Health Crises.","authors":"Søren Valgreen Knudsen, Inge Kristensen, Nanna Kure-Biegel, Mickael Bech, Hanne Agerbak, Camilla Plambeck Hansen, Christina Mohr-Jensen, Jan Brink Valentin, Michael Bang Petersen, Jan Mainz","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S495041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global economies, social structures, and public health systems. However, Denmark stood out as an exception, maintaining steady life expectancy during this period. This raises important questions about the factors that strengthened the Danish healthcare system and society against the pandemic's challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Danish healthcare system serves 5.8 million citizens with free care, advanced digital infrastructure, and comprehensive health registers. Under the auspices of the Danish Society for Patient Safety, insights from Denmark's response to COVID-19 were collected from the onset of the pandemic. This paper builds on these collected experiences, covering crucial areas such as strategies to reduce transmission, digitalization, management of non-COVID diseases, tracking adverse events, workplace well-being, development and use of predictive models, and maintaining public trust. Patient-level data on contacts, contact types, and clinical procedures were obtained from health administrative systems and clinical quality registries. All results were reported as raw counts, with no statistical analyses applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During COVID-19, Denmark's healthcare system demonstrated resilience by adapting swiftly, achieving a high vaccination rate, shifting to virtual care, enhancing response capacity through real-time adverse event tracking, and supporting healthcare workers through crisis teams minimizing prolonged sick leave. Predictive models accurately forecasted healthcare demands, while public health strategies focused on monitoring public behavior and trust in authorities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A key lesson from Denmark's handling of COVID-19 is that much of the observed resilience stemmed from pre-existing structures that could be reused, further developed, and expanded. This resilience was further enhanced by an unprecedented readiness for change, cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary collaboration, and the removal of typical barriers. These experiences aim to further improve the quality and resilience of healthcare in Denmark and inspire other countries' healthcare systems. Moving forward, acknowledging chronic conflicts as the new normal, coupled with the reminder that \"hope is not a strategy\", could serve as a pivotal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"3247-3256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S495041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global economies, social structures, and public health systems. However, Denmark stood out as an exception, maintaining steady life expectancy during this period. This raises important questions about the factors that strengthened the Danish healthcare system and society against the pandemic's challenges.

Methods: The Danish healthcare system serves 5.8 million citizens with free care, advanced digital infrastructure, and comprehensive health registers. Under the auspices of the Danish Society for Patient Safety, insights from Denmark's response to COVID-19 were collected from the onset of the pandemic. This paper builds on these collected experiences, covering crucial areas such as strategies to reduce transmission, digitalization, management of non-COVID diseases, tracking adverse events, workplace well-being, development and use of predictive models, and maintaining public trust. Patient-level data on contacts, contact types, and clinical procedures were obtained from health administrative systems and clinical quality registries. All results were reported as raw counts, with no statistical analyses applied.

Results: During COVID-19, Denmark's healthcare system demonstrated resilience by adapting swiftly, achieving a high vaccination rate, shifting to virtual care, enhancing response capacity through real-time adverse event tracking, and supporting healthcare workers through crisis teams minimizing prolonged sick leave. Predictive models accurately forecasted healthcare demands, while public health strategies focused on monitoring public behavior and trust in authorities.

Discussion: A key lesson from Denmark's handling of COVID-19 is that much of the observed resilience stemmed from pre-existing structures that could be reused, further developed, and expanded. This resilience was further enhanced by an unprecedented readiness for change, cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary collaboration, and the removal of typical barriers. These experiences aim to further improve the quality and resilience of healthcare in Denmark and inspire other countries' healthcare systems. Moving forward, acknowledging chronic conflicts as the new normal, coupled with the reminder that "hope is not a strategy", could serve as a pivotal approach.

希望不是战略:2019冠状病毒病为未来卫生危机提供的重要教训。
2019冠状病毒病大流行扰乱了全球经济、社会结构和公共卫生系统。然而,丹麦是一个例外,在此期间保持稳定的预期寿命。这就提出了一些重要的问题,即是哪些因素加强了丹麦的医疗体系和社会,使其能够应对大流行的挑战。方法:丹麦医疗保健系统为580万公民提供免费医疗、先进的数字基础设施和全面的健康登记。在丹麦患者安全协会的主持下,从大流行开始,收集了丹麦应对COVID-19的见解。本文以这些收集到的经验为基础,涵盖了减少传播战略、数字化、非covid - 19疾病管理、不良事件跟踪、工作场所福祉、预测模型的开发和使用以及维护公众信任等关键领域。从卫生管理系统和临床质量登记处获得了有关接触者、接触类型和临床程序的患者层面数据。所有结果均以原始计数报告,未进行统计分析。结果:在2019冠状病毒病期间,丹麦的卫生保健系统通过快速适应、实现高疫苗接接率、转向虚拟护理、通过实时不良事件跟踪提高应对能力、通过危机小组支持卫生保健工作者最大限度地减少长时间病假,展现了韧性。预测模型准确地预测了医疗保健需求,而公共卫生战略侧重于监测公众行为和对当局的信任。讨论:丹麦应对2019冠状病毒病的一个重要经验是,我们观察到的韧性很大程度上来自于可以重复使用、进一步开发和扩建的既有结构。前所未有的变革准备、跨部门和跨学科合作以及消除典型障碍进一步增强了这种韧性。这些经验旨在进一步提高丹麦医疗保健的质量和弹性,并激励其他国家的医疗保健系统。向前迈进,承认长期冲突是新常态,同时提醒人们“希望不是一种战略”,可以作为关键的办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信