Júlio A Costa, César André Coelho, António Ferraz, João Brito, José Guilherme, André Seabra, Bruno Travassos, Hugo Folgado, Bruno Gonçalves
{"title":"The Influence of Including Goalkeepers on the Intensity Demands of Walking Football Practice.","authors":"Júlio A Costa, César André Coelho, António Ferraz, João Brito, José Guilherme, André Seabra, Bruno Travassos, Hugo Folgado, Bruno Gonçalves","doi":"10.3390/sports12120346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This preliminary study examined the effects of playing walking football with and without a goalkeeper (GK) on physiological, physical, technical, and perceptual variables in older men. Twenty participants (67 ± 4.7 years) engaged in two five vs. five walking football sessions, one WITH-GK and one WITHOUT-GK, using a randomized crossover design. The heart rate (HR), distance covered, technical actions, perceived exercise intensity, and enjoyment were measured. The results showed a significantly higher average HR (131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, <i>p</i> < 0.001), %HRmax (79% vs. 74%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and time in higher HR zones (>80%HRmax, <i>p</i> < 0.05) in the WITH-GK condition. Participants also covered more total distance in the WITH-GK condition (1123 m vs. 1083 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001), particularly at speeds above 4 km/h (834 m vs. 781 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Conversely, more passes were made in the WITHOUT-GK condition (20 vs. 16 passes, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while the WITH-GK condition showed more shots (two vs. one, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The perceived exercise intensity was slightly higher in the WITHOUT-GK condition (five vs. four, <i>p</i> = 0.01), although the enjoyment levels were similar, with a slight preference for WITHOUT-GK. Overall, playing WITHOUT-GK provides a safer, lower-intensity alternative to WITH-GK, reducing the physical and perceived strain while maintaining enjoyment. This makes WITHOUT-GK particularly suitable for older adults or individuals with health conditions, promoting participation and rehabilitation with minimized risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12120346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This preliminary study examined the effects of playing walking football with and without a goalkeeper (GK) on physiological, physical, technical, and perceptual variables in older men. Twenty participants (67 ± 4.7 years) engaged in two five vs. five walking football sessions, one WITH-GK and one WITHOUT-GK, using a randomized crossover design. The heart rate (HR), distance covered, technical actions, perceived exercise intensity, and enjoyment were measured. The results showed a significantly higher average HR (131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, p < 0.001), %HRmax (79% vs. 74%, p < 0.001), and time in higher HR zones (>80%HRmax, p < 0.05) in the WITH-GK condition. Participants also covered more total distance in the WITH-GK condition (1123 m vs. 1083 m, p < 0.001), particularly at speeds above 4 km/h (834 m vs. 781 m, p < 0.001). Conversely, more passes were made in the WITHOUT-GK condition (20 vs. 16 passes, p < 0.001), while the WITH-GK condition showed more shots (two vs. one, p < 0.001). The perceived exercise intensity was slightly higher in the WITHOUT-GK condition (five vs. four, p = 0.01), although the enjoyment levels were similar, with a slight preference for WITHOUT-GK. Overall, playing WITHOUT-GK provides a safer, lower-intensity alternative to WITH-GK, reducing the physical and perceived strain while maintaining enjoyment. This makes WITHOUT-GK particularly suitable for older adults or individuals with health conditions, promoting participation and rehabilitation with minimized risks.
这项初步研究考察了在有守门员和没有守门员(GK)的情况下踢步行足球对老年男性的生理、身体、技术和感知变量的影响。20名参与者(67±4.7岁)采用随机交叉设计,进行了两次5 vs 5步行足球训练,一次使用gk,一次不使用gk。测量心率(HR)、覆盖距离、技术动作、感知运动强度和享受程度。结果显示,在WITH-GK条件下,平均心率(131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, p < 0.001)、%HRmax (79% vs. 74%, p < 0.001)和高心率区时间(bbb80 %HRmax, p < 0.05)显著增加。在WITH-GK条件下,参与者还跑了更多的总距离(1123米对1083米,p < 0.001),特别是在速度超过4公里/小时时(834米对781米,p < 0.001)。相反,在没有gk的情况下,传球次数更多(20次对16次,p < 0.001),而在有gk的情况下,传球次数更多(2次对1次,p < 0.001)。在没有gk的情况下,感知到的运动强度略高(5比4,p = 0.01),尽管享受水平相似,但没有gk的情况下略有偏好。总的来说,与WITH-GK相比,玩WITH-GK提供了一个更安全、更低强度的选择,在保持乐趣的同时减少了身体和感知的压力。这使得WITHOUT-GK特别适合老年人或有健康问题的个人,以最小的风险促进参与和康复。