Zhihao Jiang , Yifan Zhu , Bin Li , Zhen Shan , Shasha Huang , Jie Deng , Zhu Wang
{"title":"Effect of Interventional Ultrasound in the Treatment of Postthyroidectomy Vocal Cord Dysfunction: A Preliminary Exploratory Study","authors":"Zhihao Jiang , Yifan Zhu , Bin Li , Zhen Shan , Shasha Huang , Jie Deng , Zhu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore the efficacy of interventional ultrasound treatment for hoarseness caused by nondisconnected recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after thyroidectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In this retrospective study, we analysed the clinical data of 21 patients who underwent interventional ultrasound therapy (ultrasound-guided injection of a Diprospan and saline mixture) for postthyroidectomy hoarseness at our hospital between August 1, 2023, and January 31, 2024 (the Diprospan group) and randomly selected 21 patients who did not receive any treatment for postthyroidectomy hoarseness during the same period as the control group. The average vocal cord activity improvement time for the Diprospan group was calculated and compared with that of untreated patients from previous studies. Vocal cord activity improvement rates were assessed at 1, 2, and 3 mo after thyroidectomy, and changes in the voice handicap index (VHI) and the subjective listening perception scale (GRBAS) scores before and after treatment were evaluated. Additionally, the efficacy was compared between patients treated within 2 wk (timely intervention group, TI group) and those treated 2 wk after thyroidectomy (delayed intervention group, DI group) to explore the impact of treatment timing on outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the Diprospan group, the average vocal cord activity improvement time was 44.6 ± 4.7 d for those treated within 2 wk after thyroidectomy and 17.7 ± 1.5 d for those treated 2 wk after thyroidectomy, both of which were significantly shorter than the 6 mo to 1 y reported in the literature. The improvement rates at 1, 2, and 3 mo after thyroidectomy were significantly greater in the Diprospan group than in the control group (0.0% vs. 28.6%, 23.8% vs. 81.0%, 33.3% vs. 90.5%, <em>p</em> < 0.05). The VHI score (72.6 ± 21.2 vs. 12.6 ± 24.7, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and GRBAS score (12.0 vs. 0.0, <em>p</em> < 0.001) significantly improved after treatment. Compared with the DI group, the TI group also showed faster voice recovery (19.8 ± 5.8 d vs. 14.0 ± 2.6 d, <em>p</em> < 0.05). No treatment-related adverse reactions were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Interventional ultrasound is a safe and effective treatment for hoarseness after thyroidectomy, as it effectively improves vocal cord mobility and accelerates voice recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 3","pages":"Pages 578-584"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To explore the efficacy of interventional ultrasound treatment for hoarseness caused by nondisconnected recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after thyroidectomy.
Materials and methods
In this retrospective study, we analysed the clinical data of 21 patients who underwent interventional ultrasound therapy (ultrasound-guided injection of a Diprospan and saline mixture) for postthyroidectomy hoarseness at our hospital between August 1, 2023, and January 31, 2024 (the Diprospan group) and randomly selected 21 patients who did not receive any treatment for postthyroidectomy hoarseness during the same period as the control group. The average vocal cord activity improvement time for the Diprospan group was calculated and compared with that of untreated patients from previous studies. Vocal cord activity improvement rates were assessed at 1, 2, and 3 mo after thyroidectomy, and changes in the voice handicap index (VHI) and the subjective listening perception scale (GRBAS) scores before and after treatment were evaluated. Additionally, the efficacy was compared between patients treated within 2 wk (timely intervention group, TI group) and those treated 2 wk after thyroidectomy (delayed intervention group, DI group) to explore the impact of treatment timing on outcomes.
Results
In the Diprospan group, the average vocal cord activity improvement time was 44.6 ± 4.7 d for those treated within 2 wk after thyroidectomy and 17.7 ± 1.5 d for those treated 2 wk after thyroidectomy, both of which were significantly shorter than the 6 mo to 1 y reported in the literature. The improvement rates at 1, 2, and 3 mo after thyroidectomy were significantly greater in the Diprospan group than in the control group (0.0% vs. 28.6%, 23.8% vs. 81.0%, 33.3% vs. 90.5%, p < 0.05). The VHI score (72.6 ± 21.2 vs. 12.6 ± 24.7, p < 0.001) and GRBAS score (12.0 vs. 0.0, p < 0.001) significantly improved after treatment. Compared with the DI group, the TI group also showed faster voice recovery (19.8 ± 5.8 d vs. 14.0 ± 2.6 d, p < 0.05). No treatment-related adverse reactions were observed.
Conclusion
Interventional ultrasound is a safe and effective treatment for hoarseness after thyroidectomy, as it effectively improves vocal cord mobility and accelerates voice recovery.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.