Disparities in quality of life by race, gender, and sexual orientation: An intersectional analysis of population-representative data in Gauteng, South Africa.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nicholas Metheny, Gabriel John Dusing, Pedzisai Ndagurwa, Sthembiso Pollen Mkhize
{"title":"Disparities in quality of life by race, gender, and sexual orientation: An intersectional analysis of population-representative data in Gauteng, South Africa.","authors":"Nicholas Metheny, Gabriel John Dusing, Pedzisai Ndagurwa, Sthembiso Pollen Mkhize","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa's history of apartheid has led to persistent inequalities. While progress has been made since 1994, disparities in quality of life (QoL) remain, particularly along racial lines. This study examines how race, gender, and sexual orientation intersect to influence QoL in Gauteng - South Africa's most populous and economically vibrant province.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Gauteng City-Region Observatory's QoL 6 (2020/2021) Survey, we analyzed a sample of 10,760 respondents. We employed inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment (IPWRA) to estimate the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) of race, gender, and sexual minority status on QoL, while controlling for socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant QoL disparities were observed across intersecting identities. White heterosexual men had the highest QoL scores, while Black sexual minority women had the lowest. After adjusting for covariates, all Black groups exhibited significantly lower QoL scores compared to their White counterparts. The largest gap was between White sexual minority women and Black sexual minority men (ATE: -14.47; 95%CI: -17.18,-11.76). Within the Black population, heterosexual men had significantly higher QoL than heterosexual women (ATE: -0.98; 95%CI: -1.54, -0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite progress since apartheid, substantial QoL disparities persist in Gauteng, primarily along racial lines, particularly in access to services and socio-economic opportunities. The intersectionality of race, gender, and sexual orientation creates distinct vulnerabilities, particularly for Black sexual minority women. These findings suggest that current policies aimed at improving equity may be insufficient. Addressing these disparities requires a multifaceted approach that considers the complex interplay of race, gender, and sexual orientation in shaping QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"117651"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: South Africa's history of apartheid has led to persistent inequalities. While progress has been made since 1994, disparities in quality of life (QoL) remain, particularly along racial lines. This study examines how race, gender, and sexual orientation intersect to influence QoL in Gauteng - South Africa's most populous and economically vibrant province.

Methods: Using data from the Gauteng City-Region Observatory's QoL 6 (2020/2021) Survey, we analyzed a sample of 10,760 respondents. We employed inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment (IPWRA) to estimate the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) of race, gender, and sexual minority status on QoL, while controlling for socioeconomic factors.

Results: Significant QoL disparities were observed across intersecting identities. White heterosexual men had the highest QoL scores, while Black sexual minority women had the lowest. After adjusting for covariates, all Black groups exhibited significantly lower QoL scores compared to their White counterparts. The largest gap was between White sexual minority women and Black sexual minority men (ATE: -14.47; 95%CI: -17.18,-11.76). Within the Black population, heterosexual men had significantly higher QoL than heterosexual women (ATE: -0.98; 95%CI: -1.54, -0.42).

Conclusions: Despite progress since apartheid, substantial QoL disparities persist in Gauteng, primarily along racial lines, particularly in access to services and socio-economic opportunities. The intersectionality of race, gender, and sexual orientation creates distinct vulnerabilities, particularly for Black sexual minority women. These findings suggest that current policies aimed at improving equity may be insufficient. Addressing these disparities requires a multifaceted approach that considers the complex interplay of race, gender, and sexual orientation in shaping QoL.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信