Impact of frailty on outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Saiya Chen, Shengjing Zhang, Shengsheng Cai, Huanfen Wang
{"title":"Impact of frailty on outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Saiya Chen, Shengjing Zhang, Shengsheng Cai, Huanfen Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02728-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the preferred treatment for complex multi-vessel coronary artery disease, offering substantial long-term benefits. Non-cardiac comorbidities such as frailty may significantly affect the outcomes of this procedure. However, the exact impact of frailty on CABG outcomes remains unclear, particularly given its exclusion from many pivotal revascularization trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate existing data to evaluate the impact of frailty on short- and long-term outcomes following CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus were done to identify studies that were published up to March 31, 2024, had detailed preoperative frailty assessments and compared frail versus non-frail adult patients undergoing CABG. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events within one year. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission rates and length of stay. A random-effects model was used to account for heterogeneity. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our meta-analysis, involving data from 14 studies, revealed a significant increase in both 30-day (OR 2.52; 95% CI: 2.07 to 3.07) and 1-year mortality (OR 2.58; 95% CI: 1.49 to 4.45) among frail patients. The risk of acute cardiac and cerebrovascular complications was comparable in all patients (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.19). However, frailty was associated with a significant increase in the risk of acute kidney injury (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.26 to 4.23). Frail patients were more likely to have longer hospital stays and higher readmission rates compared to their non-frail counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms the critical impact of frailty on mortality and morbidity in CABG patients and advocates for the integration of frailty assessments into the preoperative evaluation process. Addressing frailty can lead to more individualized patient care and better outcomes, urging a paradigm shift towards comprehensive, patient-centric management in cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Prospero register: </strong>CRD42024521327.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":"419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02728-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the preferred treatment for complex multi-vessel coronary artery disease, offering substantial long-term benefits. Non-cardiac comorbidities such as frailty may significantly affect the outcomes of this procedure. However, the exact impact of frailty on CABG outcomes remains unclear, particularly given its exclusion from many pivotal revascularization trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate existing data to evaluate the impact of frailty on short- and long-term outcomes following CABG.

Methods: Searches across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus were done to identify studies that were published up to March 31, 2024, had detailed preoperative frailty assessments and compared frail versus non-frail adult patients undergoing CABG. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events within one year. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission rates and length of stay. A random-effects model was used to account for heterogeneity. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Our meta-analysis, involving data from 14 studies, revealed a significant increase in both 30-day (OR 2.52; 95% CI: 2.07 to 3.07) and 1-year mortality (OR 2.58; 95% CI: 1.49 to 4.45) among frail patients. The risk of acute cardiac and cerebrovascular complications was comparable in all patients (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.19). However, frailty was associated with a significant increase in the risk of acute kidney injury (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.26 to 4.23). Frail patients were more likely to have longer hospital stays and higher readmission rates compared to their non-frail counterparts.

Conclusion: Our study confirms the critical impact of frailty on mortality and morbidity in CABG patients and advocates for the integration of frailty assessments into the preoperative evaluation process. Addressing frailty can lead to more individualized patient care and better outcomes, urging a paradigm shift towards comprehensive, patient-centric management in cardiac surgery.

Prospero register: CRD42024521327.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信