Limited consensus on what climate anxiety is: Insights from content overlap analysis on 12 questionnaires.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102957
Silke van Dijk, Kevin van Schie, Tom Smeets, Gaëtan Mertens
{"title":"Limited consensus on what climate anxiety is: Insights from content overlap analysis on 12 questionnaires.","authors":"Silke van Dijk, Kevin van Schie, Tom Smeets, Gaëtan Mertens","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Climate anxiety is a phenomenon that is gaining importance due to the general public's increased awareness of the worsening climate crisis. At present, climate anxiety is not operationalized consistently across the existing literature. It is important to gain more consensus on the definition and operationalization of climate anxiety to facilitate reliable and generalizable research and to further develop interventions. Content analysis can contribute to this by providing insight into the overlap in the content of climate anxiety measures. With a systematic search, this study identified and analyzed 12 distinct scales measuring climate anxiety. The 119 items covered a total of 57 disparate symptoms. Jaccard indices showed that the mean overlap between symptoms of different climate anxiety scales was generally very low, as was the overlap between pairwise comparisons of climate anxiety scales. These results highlight the lack of uniformity in assessing climate anxiety and the need to properly define and operationalize this concept. The potential reasons for low overlap and how this might impact the reliability and validity of existing measures are discussed. It is critical that future work aims at finding consensus on the definition of climate anxiety (e.g., through a Delphi study) and psychometrically comparing the different questionnaires.</p>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"109 ","pages":"102957"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102957","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate anxiety is a phenomenon that is gaining importance due to the general public's increased awareness of the worsening climate crisis. At present, climate anxiety is not operationalized consistently across the existing literature. It is important to gain more consensus on the definition and operationalization of climate anxiety to facilitate reliable and generalizable research and to further develop interventions. Content analysis can contribute to this by providing insight into the overlap in the content of climate anxiety measures. With a systematic search, this study identified and analyzed 12 distinct scales measuring climate anxiety. The 119 items covered a total of 57 disparate symptoms. Jaccard indices showed that the mean overlap between symptoms of different climate anxiety scales was generally very low, as was the overlap between pairwise comparisons of climate anxiety scales. These results highlight the lack of uniformity in assessing climate anxiety and the need to properly define and operationalize this concept. The potential reasons for low overlap and how this might impact the reliability and validity of existing measures are discussed. It is critical that future work aims at finding consensus on the definition of climate anxiety (e.g., through a Delphi study) and psychometrically comparing the different questionnaires.

关于气候焦虑的有限共识:来自12份问卷内容重叠分析的见解。
气候焦虑是一种越来越重要的现象,因为普通大众对日益恶化的气候危机的认识越来越高。目前,气候焦虑在现有文献中并未得到一致的操作。重要的是要在气候焦虑的定义和操作上获得更多的共识,以促进可靠和可推广的研究,并进一步制定干预措施。内容分析可以通过提供对气候焦虑措施内容重叠的洞察来促进这一点。通过系统搜索,本研究确定并分析了衡量气候焦虑的12种不同量表。这119个项目总共涵盖了57种不同的症状。Jaccard指数显示,不同气候焦虑量表症状之间的平均重叠度普遍很低,气候焦虑量表两两比较之间的重叠度也很低。这些结果突出表明,在评估气候焦虑方面缺乏一致性,需要对这一概念进行适当的定义和操作。讨论了低重叠的潜在原因以及这可能如何影响现有措施的可靠性和有效性。至关重要的是,未来的工作旨在就气候焦虑的定义找到共识(例如,通过德尔菲研究),并从心理计量学上比较不同的问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信