The Association of County-Level Presidential Election Outcome and COVID-19 Mortality in Colorado, 2020-2022.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kelly A DeBie, Margaret J Gutilla, Kayleigh P Keller, Jennifer L Peel, David Rojas-Rueda, Andreas M Neophytou
{"title":"The Association of County-Level Presidential Election Outcome and COVID-19 Mortality in Colorado, 2020-2022.","authors":"Kelly A DeBie, Margaret J Gutilla, Kayleigh P Keller, Jennifer L Peel, David Rojas-Rueda, Andreas M Neophytou","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic occurred during a time of political tension in the United States. County-level political environment may have been influential in COVID-19 outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the association between county-level political environment and age-adjusted COVID-19 mortality rates from 2020 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Design setting: </strong>Political environment was measured by the 2020 Presidential election results and compared with age-adjusted COVID-19 mortality rates by county in Colorado.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using negative binomial regression incorporating a population offset term. Models adjusted for populational differences using the demographics percentile from Colorado's EnviroScreen Environmental Justice Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age-adjusted county mortality rates ranged from 14.3 to 446.8.0 per 100 000. 2021 COVID-19 mortality rates were nearly twice as high in counties voting for Donald Trump compared to those voting for Joseph Biden (adjusted RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.59, 2.47). Results for 2020 and 2022 mortality models were also in the positive direction, though the confidence intervals crossed null values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results build on a growing body of evidence that political environment may have been influential for COVID-19 mortality, helping to understand the drivers of health outcomes. Implications for the public health system as we shift into the endemic period of COVID-19 include motivation for collaborative work to restore and rebuild trust among and between stakeholders and the community, as well as increase health education given its' influence on both individual and community behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic occurred during a time of political tension in the United States. County-level political environment may have been influential in COVID-19 outcomes.

Objective: This study examined the association between county-level political environment and age-adjusted COVID-19 mortality rates from 2020 to 2022.

Design setting: Political environment was measured by the 2020 Presidential election results and compared with age-adjusted COVID-19 mortality rates by county in Colorado.

Main outcome measures: Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using negative binomial regression incorporating a population offset term. Models adjusted for populational differences using the demographics percentile from Colorado's EnviroScreen Environmental Justice Tool.

Results: Age-adjusted county mortality rates ranged from 14.3 to 446.8.0 per 100 000. 2021 COVID-19 mortality rates were nearly twice as high in counties voting for Donald Trump compared to those voting for Joseph Biden (adjusted RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.59, 2.47). Results for 2020 and 2022 mortality models were also in the positive direction, though the confidence intervals crossed null values.

Conclusion: These results build on a growing body of evidence that political environment may have been influential for COVID-19 mortality, helping to understand the drivers of health outcomes. Implications for the public health system as we shift into the endemic period of COVID-19 include motivation for collaborative work to restore and rebuild trust among and between stakeholders and the community, as well as increase health education given its' influence on both individual and community behaviors.

2020-2022年科罗拉多州县级总统选举结果与COVID-19死亡率的关系
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行发生在美国政治紧张时期。县级政治环境可能对COVID-19的结果产生了影响。目的:研究2020 - 2022年县级政治环境与年龄调整后新冠肺炎死亡率的关系。设计环境:政治环境以2020年总统选举结果为衡量标准,并与科罗拉多州各县经年龄调整的COVID-19死亡率进行比较。主要结果测量:使用包含总体偏移项的负二项回归估计比率(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。模型使用来自科罗拉多州环境筛选环境正义工具的人口统计百分位数来调整人口差异。结果:年龄调整后的县死亡率为14.3 ~ 446.8.0 / 10万。2021年,投票给唐纳德·特朗普的县的COVID-19死亡率几乎是投票给约瑟夫·拜登的县的两倍(调整后的RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.59, 2.47)。2020年和2022年死亡率模型的结果也朝着积极的方向发展,尽管置信区间跨越了零值。结论:越来越多的证据表明,政治环境可能对COVID-19死亡率产生了影响,这些结果建立在这些证据的基础上,有助于了解健康结果的驱动因素。随着我们进入COVID-19流行期,对公共卫生系统的影响包括激励合作工作,以恢复和重建利益相关者与社区之间的信任,以及增加健康教育,因为它对个人和社区行为都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信