Francesca Holme, Ryan Kellogg, Semone Andu, Jessica Knaster Wasse, Keith Seinfeld, Richard Gelb
{"title":"Improving Access to Hygiene, Sanitation, and Drinking Water in King County and Beyond: Success Factors and Costs.","authors":"Francesca Holme, Ryan Kellogg, Semone Andu, Jessica Knaster Wasse, Keith Seinfeld, Richard Gelb","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Most major urban areas in the US, including Seattle and King County, have a long-standing lack of public restrooms, handwashing stations, and drinking water, presenting public health risks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To aid decision-makers in expanding access, we review available information regarding successful hygiene programs in urban settings to identify shared characteristics and costs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We reviewed 10 journal articles, 49 news articles, and 54 pieces of gray literature including reports, white papers, and online resources describing real-world hygiene, sanitation, and drinking water programs in US and global urban settings. We selected programs in 8 cities and applied a thematic analysis to identify shared success factors. We also summarized costs where available.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Calgary (Canada), Denver (Colorado), London (United Kingdom), Los Angeles (California), Portland (Oregon), San Francisco (California), Seattle (Washington), and Vancouver (Canada).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful programs usually provide frequent cleaning and maintenance, are designed and operated to discourage crime and misuse, leverage existing infrastructure, and include mobile solutions. Cities can expect an initial cost of at least $133 000 per toilet and annual operating costs of at least $100 000 per toilet.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By employing proven solutions and bringing them to scale over time, cities can promote health while improving quality of life and facilitating movement through public spaces for all. Costs should be understood in the context of expenses such as sidewalk cleaning and human waste removal that are necessitated by a lack of restrooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"E34-E39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Most major urban areas in the US, including Seattle and King County, have a long-standing lack of public restrooms, handwashing stations, and drinking water, presenting public health risks.
Objective: To aid decision-makers in expanding access, we review available information regarding successful hygiene programs in urban settings to identify shared characteristics and costs.
Design: We reviewed 10 journal articles, 49 news articles, and 54 pieces of gray literature including reports, white papers, and online resources describing real-world hygiene, sanitation, and drinking water programs in US and global urban settings. We selected programs in 8 cities and applied a thematic analysis to identify shared success factors. We also summarized costs where available.
Settings: Calgary (Canada), Denver (Colorado), London (United Kingdom), Los Angeles (California), Portland (Oregon), San Francisco (California), Seattle (Washington), and Vancouver (Canada).
Results: Successful programs usually provide frequent cleaning and maintenance, are designed and operated to discourage crime and misuse, leverage existing infrastructure, and include mobile solutions. Cities can expect an initial cost of at least $133 000 per toilet and annual operating costs of at least $100 000 per toilet.
Conclusions: By employing proven solutions and bringing them to scale over time, cities can promote health while improving quality of life and facilitating movement through public spaces for all. Costs should be understood in the context of expenses such as sidewalk cleaning and human waste removal that are necessitated by a lack of restrooms.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.