Improving Access to Hygiene, Sanitation, and Drinking Water in King County and Beyond: Success Factors and Costs.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Francesca Holme, Ryan Kellogg, Semone Andu, Jessica Knaster Wasse, Keith Seinfeld, Richard Gelb
{"title":"Improving Access to Hygiene, Sanitation, and Drinking Water in King County and Beyond: Success Factors and Costs.","authors":"Francesca Holme, Ryan Kellogg, Semone Andu, Jessica Knaster Wasse, Keith Seinfeld, Richard Gelb","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Most major urban areas in the US, including Seattle and King County, have a long-standing lack of public restrooms, handwashing stations, and drinking water, presenting public health risks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To aid decision-makers in expanding access, we review available information regarding successful hygiene programs in urban settings to identify shared characteristics and costs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We reviewed 10 journal articles, 49 news articles, and 54 pieces of gray literature including reports, white papers, and online resources describing real-world hygiene, sanitation, and drinking water programs in US and global urban settings. We selected programs in 8 cities and applied a thematic analysis to identify shared success factors. We also summarized costs where available.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Calgary (Canada), Denver (Colorado), London (United Kingdom), Los Angeles (California), Portland (Oregon), San Francisco (California), Seattle (Washington), and Vancouver (Canada).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful programs usually provide frequent cleaning and maintenance, are designed and operated to discourage crime and misuse, leverage existing infrastructure, and include mobile solutions. Cities can expect an initial cost of at least $133 000 per toilet and annual operating costs of at least $100 000 per toilet.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By employing proven solutions and bringing them to scale over time, cities can promote health while improving quality of life and facilitating movement through public spaces for all. Costs should be understood in the context of expenses such as sidewalk cleaning and human waste removal that are necessitated by a lack of restrooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"E34-E39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Most major urban areas in the US, including Seattle and King County, have a long-standing lack of public restrooms, handwashing stations, and drinking water, presenting public health risks.

Objective: To aid decision-makers in expanding access, we review available information regarding successful hygiene programs in urban settings to identify shared characteristics and costs.

Design: We reviewed 10 journal articles, 49 news articles, and 54 pieces of gray literature including reports, white papers, and online resources describing real-world hygiene, sanitation, and drinking water programs in US and global urban settings. We selected programs in 8 cities and applied a thematic analysis to identify shared success factors. We also summarized costs where available.

Settings: Calgary (Canada), Denver (Colorado), London (United Kingdom), Los Angeles (California), Portland (Oregon), San Francisco (California), Seattle (Washington), and Vancouver (Canada).

Results: Successful programs usually provide frequent cleaning and maintenance, are designed and operated to discourage crime and misuse, leverage existing infrastructure, and include mobile solutions. Cities can expect an initial cost of at least $133 000 per toilet and annual operating costs of at least $100 000 per toilet.

Conclusions: By employing proven solutions and bringing them to scale over time, cities can promote health while improving quality of life and facilitating movement through public spaces for all. Costs should be understood in the context of expenses such as sidewalk cleaning and human waste removal that are necessitated by a lack of restrooms.

改善金县及其他地区的个人卫生、环境卫生和饮用水:成功因素和成本。
背景:美国大多数主要城市地区,包括西雅图和金县,长期以来都缺乏公共厕所、洗手站和饮用水,这给公众健康带来了风险。目的:为了帮助决策者扩大可及性,我们回顾了有关城市环境中成功的卫生项目的现有信息,以确定共同的特征和成本。设计:我们回顾了10篇期刊文章、49篇新闻文章和54篇灰色文献,包括报告、白皮书和在线资源,描述了美国和全球城市环境中真实的卫生、环境卫生和饮用水项目。我们选择了8个城市的项目,并应用主题分析来确定共同的成功因素。我们还总结了可用的成本。所在地:卡尔加里(加拿大)、丹佛(科罗拉多州)、伦敦(英国)、洛杉矶(加利福尼亚州)、波特兰(俄勒冈州)、旧金山(加利福尼亚州)、西雅图(华盛顿州)和温哥华(加拿大)。结果:成功的项目通常提供频繁的清洁和维护,设计和操作旨在阻止犯罪和滥用,利用现有的基础设施,并包括移动解决方案。预计每个厕所的初始成本至少为13.3万美元,每个厕所的年运营成本至少为10万美元。结论:通过采用经过验证的解决方案并逐步推广,城市可以促进健康,同时提高生活质量,并为所有人在公共空间的行动提供便利。成本应该在诸如人行道清洁和人类粪便清除等费用的背景下被理解,这些费用是由于缺乏厕所而必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信