Percutaneous sperm retrieval technique: A reliable and effective sperm retrieval procedure for ICSI in patients with obstructive azoospermia.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Thiago P Furtado, Andrea Kauffman Zeh, Marcelo H Furtado
{"title":"Percutaneous sperm retrieval technique: A reliable and effective sperm retrieval procedure for ICSI in patients with obstructive azoospermia.","authors":"Thiago P Furtado, Andrea Kauffman Zeh, Marcelo H Furtado","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the reliability and effectiveness of the percutaneous sperm retrieval technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the records of 123 consecutive patients with obstructive azoospermia who underwent percutaneous sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using Percutaneous Epididymal Sperm Aspiration (PESA) with or without a rescue Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA). We compared patients who had the first sperm retrieval ever and patients who had more than one sperm retrieval performed. In addition, the rate of adequate sperm retrieved for ICSI and reproductive outcomes between the groups and literature were compared. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate sperm retrieved for ICSI; the secondary outcomes were reproductive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The successful sperm retrieval was 157 in 157 attempts, with a cumulative sperm retrieval rate of 100%, whether the first or repeated retrieval attempt. The clinical pregnancy rate in patients who had the first sperm retrieval ever and patients who had more than one sperm retrieval performed was 36/108 (33.3%) vs. 15/29 (51.7%) (Pearson chi2(1) = 3.3088; p = 0.085), respectively. Other reproductive outcomes (fertilization rate, cleavage rate, and biochemical pregnancy) were also similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PESA associated with or without rescue TESA is a reliable and effective strategy either for retrieving sperm for ICSI, demystifying the concerns about the reliability of repeated PESA, or for reproductive results. This information is reassuring, especially but not exclusively to places with limited resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the reliability and effectiveness of the percutaneous sperm retrieval technique.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 123 consecutive patients with obstructive azoospermia who underwent percutaneous sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using Percutaneous Epididymal Sperm Aspiration (PESA) with or without a rescue Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA). We compared patients who had the first sperm retrieval ever and patients who had more than one sperm retrieval performed. In addition, the rate of adequate sperm retrieved for ICSI and reproductive outcomes between the groups and literature were compared. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate sperm retrieved for ICSI; the secondary outcomes were reproductive.

Results: The successful sperm retrieval was 157 in 157 attempts, with a cumulative sperm retrieval rate of 100%, whether the first or repeated retrieval attempt. The clinical pregnancy rate in patients who had the first sperm retrieval ever and patients who had more than one sperm retrieval performed was 36/108 (33.3%) vs. 15/29 (51.7%) (Pearson chi2(1) = 3.3088; p = 0.085), respectively. Other reproductive outcomes (fertilization rate, cleavage rate, and biochemical pregnancy) were also similar in both groups.

Conclusions: PESA associated with or without rescue TESA is a reliable and effective strategy either for retrieving sperm for ICSI, demystifying the concerns about the reliability of repeated PESA, or for reproductive results. This information is reassuring, especially but not exclusively to places with limited resources.

经皮精子回收技术:一个可靠和有效的精子回收程序的ICSI患者的阻塞性无精子症。
目的:探讨经皮取精技术的可靠性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析连续123例梗阻性无精子症患者经皮取精和经皮附睾精子抽吸术(PESA)联合或不联合抢救睾丸精子抽吸术(TESA)进行卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的记录。我们比较了第一次取精的患者和多次取精的患者。此外,还比较了两组和文献之间的ICSI取精率和生殖结果。主要结果是为ICSI获得足够精子的比率;次要结果是生殖。结果:157例成功取精157例,不论首次或多次取精,累计取精率均为100%。首次取精和多次取精患者的临床妊娠率分别为36/108(33.3%)和15/29 (51.7%)(Pearson chi2(1) = 3.3088;P = 0.085)。两组的其他生殖结果(受精率、卵裂率和生化妊娠)也相似。结论:PESA联合或不联合挽救性TESA是一种可靠和有效的策略,无论是为ICSI提取精子,消除对重复PESA可靠性的担忧,还是生殖结果。这些信息是令人放心的,尤其是但不限于资源有限的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信