Perception of occupational health and safety in the manufacturing sector: a qualitative evaluation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Chun-Yip Hon, Craig Fairclough, Jaskaren Randhawa
{"title":"Perception of occupational health and safety in the manufacturing sector: a qualitative evaluation.","authors":"Chun-Yip Hon, Craig Fairclough, Jaskaren Randhawa","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2435707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. Earlier work found gaps with respect to legislative compliance and disparities in perceptions, attitudes and beliefs towards occupational health and safety in the Ontario manufacturing sector. The current follow-up study was undertaken to gain a more thorough understanding of the cause of these gaps and differences in perspectives. <i>Methods</i>. Focus group discussions were held with workers and managers separately. Key questions related to health and safety in general, health and safety training, and health and safety communication were asked of each focus group. The discussions were qualitatively analysed. <i>Results</i>. Overall, 12 worker focus groups (<i>n</i> = 76) and seven manager focus groups (<i>n</i> = 38) were conducted. Individuals who felt safe in their workplace indicated that it was a supportive environment, and that health and safety was a priority. Health and safety training was considered important but improvements in engagement and frequency were suggested. <i>Conclusions.</i> Health and safety communication might be hindered by technical terms and language barriers. Delivering this communication in multiple ways as well as the tone of communication should be taken into consideration. Overall, safety culture was lacking and manufacturing workplaces should be mindful of the gaps identified to improve health and safety performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2435707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. Earlier work found gaps with respect to legislative compliance and disparities in perceptions, attitudes and beliefs towards occupational health and safety in the Ontario manufacturing sector. The current follow-up study was undertaken to gain a more thorough understanding of the cause of these gaps and differences in perspectives. Methods. Focus group discussions were held with workers and managers separately. Key questions related to health and safety in general, health and safety training, and health and safety communication were asked of each focus group. The discussions were qualitatively analysed. Results. Overall, 12 worker focus groups (n = 76) and seven manager focus groups (n = 38) were conducted. Individuals who felt safe in their workplace indicated that it was a supportive environment, and that health and safety was a priority. Health and safety training was considered important but improvements in engagement and frequency were suggested. Conclusions. Health and safety communication might be hindered by technical terms and language barriers. Delivering this communication in multiple ways as well as the tone of communication should be taken into consideration. Overall, safety culture was lacking and manufacturing workplaces should be mindful of the gaps identified to improve health and safety performance.

对制造业职业健康和安全的认识:定性评价。
目标。早期的工作发现,安大略省制造业在遵守法律方面存在差距,在对职业健康和安全的看法、态度和信念方面也存在差异。目前进行的后续研究是为了更彻底地了解这些差距和观点差异的原因。方法。分别与工人和管理人员进行了焦点小组讨论。向每个焦点小组提出了与一般健康和安全、健康和安全培训以及健康和安全交流有关的关键问题。对讨论进行了定性分析。结果。总共进行了12个工人焦点小组(n = 76)和7个经理焦点小组(n = 38)。在工作场所感到安全的个人表示,这是一个支持性的环境,健康和安全是一个优先事项。健康和安全培训被认为很重要,但建议改进参与和频率。结论。卫生和安全方面的交流可能受到技术术语和语言障碍的阻碍。应该考虑以多种方式传递这种信息以及沟通的语气。总体而言,缺乏安全文化,制造业工作场所应注意已发现的差距,以改善健康和安全绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信