Development of a capstone exam as pre-advanced pharmacy practice experiences domains assessment.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Michael R Gionfriddo, Gale E Garmong, Michael W Perry, Autumn Stewart-Lynch, Pamela H Koerner
{"title":"Development of a capstone exam as pre-advanced pharmacy practice experiences domains assessment.","authors":"Michael R Gionfriddo, Gale E Garmong, Michael W Perry, Autumn Stewart-Lynch, Pamela H Koerner","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's (ACPE) standards require pharmacy schools to assess Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness. This paper describes the development and implementation of a Capstone Exam for assessing APPE-readiness and exploration of potential correlations between student performance on the Exam and performance measures within the didactic curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Faculty developed a Capstone examination aligned to the Pre-APPE Domains in Appendix A of the ACPE standards consisting of five stations assessing skills, which include: interviewing, counseling, prescription checking, professional communication, and inpatient order verification. Administered in the spring semester of the third professional year, students must pass all stations to progress to APPEs. Relationships between pass rates for student cohorts in the class of 2017-2023 and grade point average (GPA) and course deficiencies were explored using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since 2016, first-attempt pass rates fluctuated between 20.3 % and 51.2 % with variability in performance observed across stations and class cohorts. Students with higher GPAs were more likely to pass all stations on the first attempt. Although history of a course deficiency did not affect overall pass rates, it was associated with lower odds of passing the interviewing and order verification stations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A Capstone Exam model fulfills the requirements in ACPE Standard 25.8 using a sustainable approach and has supported curricular continuous quality improvement. Findings regarding predictive value of GPA and prior course deficiencies may enable identifying students who would benefit from additional preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 3","pages":"102240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's (ACPE) standards require pharmacy schools to assess Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness. This paper describes the development and implementation of a Capstone Exam for assessing APPE-readiness and exploration of potential correlations between student performance on the Exam and performance measures within the didactic curriculum.

Methods: Faculty developed a Capstone examination aligned to the Pre-APPE Domains in Appendix A of the ACPE standards consisting of five stations assessing skills, which include: interviewing, counseling, prescription checking, professional communication, and inpatient order verification. Administered in the spring semester of the third professional year, students must pass all stations to progress to APPEs. Relationships between pass rates for student cohorts in the class of 2017-2023 and grade point average (GPA) and course deficiencies were explored using logistic regression.

Results: Since 2016, first-attempt pass rates fluctuated between 20.3 % and 51.2 % with variability in performance observed across stations and class cohorts. Students with higher GPAs were more likely to pass all stations on the first attempt. Although history of a course deficiency did not affect overall pass rates, it was associated with lower odds of passing the interviewing and order verification stations.

Conclusions: A Capstone Exam model fulfills the requirements in ACPE Standard 25.8 using a sustainable approach and has supported curricular continuous quality improvement. Findings regarding predictive value of GPA and prior course deficiencies may enable identifying students who would benefit from additional preparation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信