Dementia Prevention Self-Management in Older Thai Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Psychometric Properties of Two Questionnaires.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING

Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.3390/nursrep14040277

Noppamas Pipatpiboon, Jirapas Sripetchwandee, Eakachai Kantawong, Ruksanudt Budda, Daniel Bressington

{"title":"Dementia Prevention Self-Management in Older Thai Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Psychometric Properties of Two Questionnaires.","authors":"Noppamas Pipatpiboon, Jirapas Sripetchwandee, Eakachai Kantawong, Ruksanudt Budda, Daniel Bressington","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/objectives: The prevalence of dementia, a complication of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is rising among older adults. Effective self-management for dementia prevention is essential, but no validated questionnaires currently exist to evaluate these behaviors.Methods: The Dementia Preventive Individual and Family Self-Management Process Questionnaire (DP-IFSM-PQ) and the Dementia Preventive Self-Management Behavior Questionnaire (DPSMBQ) were developed based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory to evaluate dementia prevention self-management behaviors in older adults with T2DM. Items for the DP-IFSM-PQ (30 items) and DPSMBQ (29 items) were generated through literature review and tested for face validity. A quantitative cross-sectional study evaluated their psychometric properties using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 311) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 254).Results: The final DP-IFSM-PQ comprises four factors and 29 items, showing acceptable fit with limited discriminant validity. The DPSMBQ includes seven factors and 27 items, demonstrating good fit and acceptable discriminant validity.Conclusions: The Thai-language DP-IFSM-PQ and DPSMBQ show reasonable psychometric properties for application in Thai older adults, but revisions of certain items and further studies are recommended to reassess their properties.","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3786-3802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: The prevalence of dementia, a complication of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is rising among older adults. Effective self-management for dementia prevention is essential, but no validated questionnaires currently exist to evaluate these behaviors.

Methods: The Dementia Preventive Individual and Family Self-Management Process Questionnaire (DP-IFSM-PQ) and the Dementia Preventive Self-Management Behavior Questionnaire (DPSMBQ) were developed based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory to evaluate dementia prevention self-management behaviors in older adults with T2DM. Items for the DP-IFSM-PQ (30 items) and DPSMBQ (29 items) were generated through literature review and tested for face validity. A quantitative cross-sectional study evaluated their psychometric properties using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 311) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 254).

Results: The final DP-IFSM-PQ comprises four factors and 29 items, showing acceptable fit with limited discriminant validity. The DPSMBQ includes seven factors and 27 items, demonstrating good fit and acceptable discriminant validity.

Conclusions: The Thai-language DP-IFSM-PQ and DPSMBQ show reasonable psychometric properties for application in Thai older adults, but revisions of certain items and further studies are recommended to reassess their properties.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nursing Reports NURSING-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

4.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.