Why do Americans foresee a grim future for their country? The influences of country well-being, national identity, and news coverage.

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Cognition Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106052
Nazike Mert, Qi Wang
{"title":"Why do Americans foresee a grim future for their country? The influences of country well-being, national identity, and news coverage.","authors":"Nazike Mert, Qi Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present research examines the factors that contribute to a negative bias in how Americans imagine the future of their country. Specifically, we tested the effects of perceived country well-being, national identity (Study 1), and news coverage (Study 2) on Americans' collective future thinking. Study 1 was situated in a cross-cultural context, in which US and Chinese participants listed within 1 min as many exciting or worrying events as they could that might happen in their country's future and reported perceived country well-being and national identity. In Study 2, US participants read positive, negative, or neutral news events happening in their country and then imagined what might happen in their country's near and distant futures. Americans imagined more negative relative to positive events and rated positive events less positively and negative events more negatively than did Chinese, with the cultural differences explained by the lower perceived country well-being among Americans. US participants exposed to negative news showed greater negative bias in their collective future thoughts than those exposed to neutral or positive news, and the effect was explained by the lower perceived country well-being in the negative news condition. These findings underscore the complexity of collective future perceptions and the significance of psychological and societal factors in shaping how people foresee their country's future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"256 ","pages":"106052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present research examines the factors that contribute to a negative bias in how Americans imagine the future of their country. Specifically, we tested the effects of perceived country well-being, national identity (Study 1), and news coverage (Study 2) on Americans' collective future thinking. Study 1 was situated in a cross-cultural context, in which US and Chinese participants listed within 1 min as many exciting or worrying events as they could that might happen in their country's future and reported perceived country well-being and national identity. In Study 2, US participants read positive, negative, or neutral news events happening in their country and then imagined what might happen in their country's near and distant futures. Americans imagined more negative relative to positive events and rated positive events less positively and negative events more negatively than did Chinese, with the cultural differences explained by the lower perceived country well-being among Americans. US participants exposed to negative news showed greater negative bias in their collective future thoughts than those exposed to neutral or positive news, and the effect was explained by the lower perceived country well-being in the negative news condition. These findings underscore the complexity of collective future perceptions and the significance of psychological and societal factors in shaping how people foresee their country's future.

为什么美国人预见到他们国家的严峻未来?国家福祉、国家认同和新闻报道的影响。
本研究考察了导致美国人对国家未来抱有负面偏见的因素。具体来说,我们测试了感知国家福祉、国家认同(研究1)和新闻报道(研究2)对美国人集体未来思维的影响。研究1是在跨文化背景下进行的,美国和中国的参与者在1分钟内尽可能多地列出他们国家未来可能发生的令人兴奋或担忧的事件,并报告他们对国家福祉和民族认同的看法。在研究2中,美国参与者阅读了发生在他们国家的积极、消极或中性的新闻事件,然后想象他们国家近期和遥远的未来可能发生的事情。与中国人相比,美国人对积极事件的想象更消极,对积极事件的评价更不积极,对消极事件的评价更消极,文化差异可以用美国人对国家幸福感的感知较低来解释。面对负面新闻的美国参与者比那些面对中性或正面新闻的参与者在集体未来想法中表现出更大的负面偏见,这种影响可以用负面新闻条件下较低的国家幸福感来解释。这些发现强调了集体对未来看法的复杂性,以及心理和社会因素在塑造人们如何预测自己国家未来方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信