A Scoping Review of Preceptor Training Programs for Physician Assistants: Curriculum and Design.

Q2 Health Professions
Erin S Schoenfuss
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Preceptor Training Programs for Physician Assistants: Curriculum and Design.","authors":"Erin S Schoenfuss","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preceptors are crucial in the education of physician assistant (PA) students, yet many lack formal preceptor training. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the curriculum and design of existing preceptor training programs for physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was developed following the methodologic framework provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The literature search included a review of the electronic databases CINAHL and MEDLINE, a Web search, and an examination of article references. The search encompassed empirical, peer-reviewed studies written in English and published between January 1, 2019, and May 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1106 sources identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria, representing 31 preceptor training programs. Eighty-four percent of these programs were based in the United States. Fifty curricular topics were identified and organized into 10 domains. Feedback and teaching were addressed in 97% of the programs. Sixteen programs used an online format, which increased each year compared with other formats. Lectures were the most common teaching method. Program length varied. The majority of participants and article authors were physicians, with only 5 programs including PA participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The curricula and design of preceptor training programs varied but were generally well received by participants. There was limited involvement of PAs in both participation and authorship of preceptor training research. This review underscores the benefits of preceptor training while highlighting the need for increased PA engagement in both training and program development.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preceptors are crucial in the education of physician assistant (PA) students, yet many lack formal preceptor training. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the curriculum and design of existing preceptor training programs for physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and physicians.

Methods: This scoping review was developed following the methodologic framework provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The literature search included a review of the electronic databases CINAHL and MEDLINE, a Web search, and an examination of article references. The search encompassed empirical, peer-reviewed studies written in English and published between January 1, 2019, and May 1, 2024.

Results: Out of 1106 sources identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria, representing 31 preceptor training programs. Eighty-four percent of these programs were based in the United States. Fifty curricular topics were identified and organized into 10 domains. Feedback and teaching were addressed in 97% of the programs. Sixteen programs used an online format, which increased each year compared with other formats. Lectures were the most common teaching method. Program length varied. The majority of participants and article authors were physicians, with only 5 programs including PA participants.

Discussion: The curricula and design of preceptor training programs varied but were generally well received by participants. There was limited involvement of PAs in both participation and authorship of preceptor training research. This review underscores the benefits of preceptor training while highlighting the need for increased PA engagement in both training and program development.

医师助理导师培训计划的范围检讨:课程与设计。
导读:辅导员在医师助理(PA)学生的教育中至关重要,但许多人缺乏正式的辅导员培训。本综述的目的是描述现有医师助理、执业护士和内科医生的培训课程和设计。方法:根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所提供的方法学框架,进行范围审查。文献检索包括对电子数据库CINAHL和MEDLINE的回顾、网络检索和文章参考文献的检查。该研究涵盖了2019年1月1日至2024年5月1日期间用英语撰写的经验性同行评议研究。结果:在确定的1106个来源中,32个符合资格标准,代表31个导师培训项目。这些项目中有84%位于美国。确定了50个课程主题并将其组织为10个领域。反馈和教学在97%的项目中得到了解决。16个项目采用了在线形式,与其他形式相比,在线形式每年都在增加。讲课是最常用的教学方法。节目长度各不相同。大多数参与者和文章作者是医生,只有5个项目包括PA参与者。讨论:导师培训项目的课程和设计各不相同,但参与者普遍接受。在导师培训研究的参与和撰写方面,专业人员的参与有限。这篇综述强调了培训导师的好处,同时也强调了在培训和项目开发中增加私人助理参与的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信